...any idea what a bubble is?
The AAPL situation doesn't seem as unreasonable as the Tulip Mania or other bubbles from an investment standpoint, I get it.
Apple = great company, great earnings
But if it's one thing tech companies taught us (and as gay webmasters, we're in a better position to understand this than the Average Joe because it's easy to think of a "website multipliers vs. brick and mortar business multipliers" comparison), it's that the current revenue or profit level of a tech business is considerably less reliable as an indicator than the revenue/profits of a brick & mortar company.
That's because when it comes to tech companies, innovation plays a far more important role than with other businesses.
A new fad/trend/whatever emerges and if you don't adapt, you're gone.
Nobody will care that you had lots of success a couple of years ago, your revenue and profits can and will decline dramatically if you don't adapt.
That's why tech companies shouldn't be analyzed using the same approach people choose for "traditional" businesses.
When asset prices deviate strongly from intrinsic values, we have a bubble.
The "intrinsic values" part is tricky when it comes to most assets though and especially tricky when it comes to tech stocks.
But what did most if not all tech companies teach us?
That we have to price in the eventual decline/failure to adapt.
Maybe Apple will always innovate, maybe this company always be in the spotlight but it probably won't and that brings us right back to the "this time it's different" situation.