Another School Shooting: Roseburg Oregon 13 Dead.



Every attention whore from my hometown is going full steam on this one today. I came to WF to get away from fb.
 
Another fucked up lonely guy. Hate to say it, but this is a continious replay of Taxi Driver with different actors. It's not an anomoly, but a society where people are allowed to slip into complete loneliness and isolation for a long time. No family, no job, no religion, no connection to anything.
 
Another dead theta faggot. It's too bad other people had to die for this idiot to end his life because he was too much of a pussy to do it Full Metal Jacket style on a toilet.
 
Well that sucks.

Edit: This pretty much covers it: "why don't you just talk to a girl instead you beta fuck, no one will respect you for this they'll just see you for the shit coward you are [sic]." I'm glad to see they're trying to be as active as they can be about not releasing his name, though it's inevitable it'll be found like three hours later.
 
Sorry for the double post, but here's an interesting question:

Anyone of the opinion that occasional shootings of 5-10 people are acceptable losses for preserving the second amendment in the United States?
 
Allow teachers to have guns already, Ms Flanagan the history teacher could have made this kid history

estelle-getty-got-a-gun-o.gif
 
Anyone of the opinion that occasional shootings of 5-10 people are acceptable losses for preserving the second amendment in the United States?

The 2nd amendment was adopted in 1791, an era where the steam rail locomotive was the pinnacle of technology.

illo180.png


Today there are human controlled vehicles on another planet, and all of us have the ability to see and speak to another person anywhere else on Earth.

mar.png


It's a different world now and the U.S. is a different country.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Irrelevant. The vast number of gun owners are not in a militia.

01-20_Cx_Editorial_cartoon_Militia_redefined_t640.jpg


Need a gun to deter a "tyrannical government"?

The rifles that civilians could get in 1791 were essentially the same as what the military had. Overrun some cannon units before they can be spiked and you've evened the odds.

Today, an AR-15 works well enough to gun down cowering 5 year olds in their classroom, along with the young teachers trying to vainly protect them with their own bodies, but are no match for an Abrams tank, F-16, or Apache helicopter.

M1-Tank.jpg


But on the flip side - it's already too late.

There are far too many guns in the States, and there's no way the government nor the people will be willing to institute the draconian policies required to clean them up.

If Sandy Hook didn't begin a change, then nothing will.

Look, Can We Please At Least Agree On One Thing About The 'Right To Bear Arms'? - Business Insider
 
Is this a side effect of prescription med's and the media. Its almost a yearly thing now and off course the politicians never waste a tragedy.

I remember when they used to put crazy people in the hospital. What sane person would do this.

They have the balls to go shoot a bunch of people but dont have that balls to go ask 20 chicks on a date and work the numbers.
 
The 2nd amendment was adopted in 1791, an era where the steam rail locomotive was the pinnacle of technology.

illo180.png


Today there are human controlled vehicles on another planet, and all of us have the ability to see and speak to another person anywhere else on Earth.

mar.png


It's a different world now and the U.S. is a different country.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Irrelevant. The vast number of gun owners are not in a militia.

01-20_Cx_Editorial_cartoon_Militia_redefined_t640.jpg


Need a gun to deter a "tyrannical government"?

The rifles that civilians could get in 1791 were essentially the same as what the military had. Overrun some cannon units before they can be spiked and you've evened the odds.

Today, an AR-15 works well enough to gun down cowering 5 year olds in their classroom, along with the young teachers trying to vainly protect them with their own bodies, but are no match for an Abrams tank, F-16, or Apache helicopter.

M1-Tank.jpg


But on the flip side - it's already too late.

There are far too many guns in the States, and there's no way the government nor the people will be willing to institute the draconian policies required to clean them up.

If Sandy Hook didn't begin a change, then nothing will.

Look, Can We Please At Least Agree On One Thing About The 'Right To Bear Arms'? - Business Insider

This has nothing to do with guns.

Crazies would still kill people without guns.

Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Michael Adebolajo. I could go on and on, but do ANY of those names ring a bell to you?
 
The 2nd amendment was adopted in 1791, an era where the steam rail locomotive was the pinnacle of technology.

illo180.png


Today there are human controlled vehicles on another planet, and all of us have the ability to see and speak to another person anywhere else on Earth.

mar.png


It's a different world now and the U.S. is a different country.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Irrelevant. The vast number of gun owners are not in a militia.

01-20_Cx_Editorial_cartoon_Militia_redefined_t640.jpg


Need a gun to deter a "tyrannical government"?

The rifles that civilians could get in 1791 were essentially the same as what the military had. Overrun some cannon units before they can be spiked and you've evened the odds.

Today, an AR-15 works well enough to gun down cowering 5 year olds in their classroom, along with the young teachers trying to vainly protect them with their own bodies, but are no match for an Abrams tank, F-16, or Apache helicopter.

M1-Tank.jpg


But on the flip side - it's already too late.

There are far too many guns in the States, and there's no way the government nor the people will be willing to institute the draconian policies required to clean them up.

If Sandy Hook didn't begin a change, then nothing will.

Look, Can We Please At Least Agree On One Thing About The 'Right To Bear Arms'? - Business Insider


The US has the world's most powerful military and still couldn't do fucking SHIT against an area a fraction the size of Texas, containing people armed with subpar weaponry (the Iraqi insurgence).

The US has every weapon in the book, and we couldn't fight a bunch of towelheads armed with outdated rifles.

The US has a vested interested in keeping its populace dumbed the fuck down and disarmed as much as possible; thus Mr. Obama (and any other gov. official) using these opportunities to make it difficult to own guns.
 
Ironically, the right wing pushback after these shootings results in higher gun sales.
 
And now evangelicals want to make it a story about persecution of Christians in America. They want all that attention to spread the gospel... and bring in new tithing members.
 
This has nothing to do with guns.
Crazies would still kill people without guns.
Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Michael Adebolajo. I could go on and on, but do ANY of those names ring a bell to you?

gun-deaths-v-terrorism.jpg


*Includes the following incidents for domestic terrorism incidents:

Knoxville church shooting (Tennessee) 7/27/08

Pittsburgh police officers killed (Pennsylvania) 4/4/09

Tiller abortion clinic (Kansas) 5/31/09

Holocaust Museum shooting (DC) 6/10/09

Fort Hood shooting (Texas) 11/5/09

Plane crash into Austin IRS building (Texas) 2/18/10

Fort Stewart Army base killing (Georgia) 12/10/11

Sikh Temple Shooting (Wisconsin) 8/7/12

St. John’s Parish police ambush (Louisiana) 8/16/12

Boston Marathon Bombing (Massachusetts) 4/15/13

LAX Shooting (California) 11/05/13