Case Study: Ad Blending/Fake News

Status
Not open for further replies.

xmcp123

New member
Sep 20, 2007
4,149
95
0
Not Louisiana
www.slightlyshadyseo.com
Ok. This is something I did awhile ago as an experiment. But in the giving spirit started here, I thought I'd share.
I wanted to find a way to get placement targetting up and running. In the past when I tried placement targetting, I barely got any impressions or clicks. So I wanted to do it right.
The target was nationalenquirer.com (yes, the trashy tabloid at grocery stores). I picked it reasoning that they had not only the demographic I wanted to test(females 30-45) but also the much sought after "stupid" demographic.
Here's the layout of the site:
20mgle.jpg

Note the adsense block at the top that allows images. There is another identically sized one at the bottom(that would prove to be my undoing)

The goal for this was to have a high CTR to get really low bids, and hope the traffic would convert over on my end. The product for this was one of the weight loss teas.

So here is the banner I designed.
63ucu0.jpg

By flipping the part on their menu, it effectively makes the ad look like a news story for the site. More than that, an important news story.

So let's go to the stats. The first few days were relatively fruitless, since I was only taking the bottom banner ad, which was rarely(if ever) seen, and was a terrible place for something designed to look like a prominent headline. Unfortunately, "Phoenix University" and similar schools were willing to pay out the ass for the same spot, so it appeared like I was going to have some issues.

The peak day I had actually managed to have a .85% CTR, but led to few conversions. That was when I had the top spot. After that, it was back to the universities again, and the CTR hovered around .06%-.21%, depending on how often I was allowed back into the coveted top spot.
Average CPC was 0.50-0.79 depending on the day. A disappointment.

After 2 weeks or so, I killed the campaign. A little cash lost, but a lesson or two learned.

Blending can work great, especially on news sites. But it's important to examine other blocks on the page to make sure you don't get your CTR torched by em. Also going against large institutions trying to do "branding" and not get conversions can often be a losing proposition depending on how much cash they're willing to burn.

If I had to do it again, I would do a few things different. Aside from examining the available blocks/current advertisers better, I would go through the effort of getting a similar domain and creating a "news" story roughly following their template. I have a feeling this would lead to a better conversion rate(which was hurtin on this ad).
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockhard and fm1234


I picked it reasoning that they had not only the demographic I wanted to test(females 30-45) but also the much sought after "stupid" demographic.

Haha Brilliant!
 
Damn, I forgot about this...
I remember we were discussing this a while back
Sounded and looked so damn good.
Sucks that those fucking universities and other companies burn up good ad slots with that branding nonsense.

Thanks for bringing this back up dude, I got to do some research on this.
 
nice case study, ive had mixed results with placement targetting. Was able to get a good ctr, but it slowly diminished over a week until i wasnt profitable
 
Even at $50 per lead, it would be a pretty hard sell to believe they were getting that much out of this.

Not sure you guys realize how big U of Phoenix really is ... you have to remember that tuition is going to be around $10,000 per year for undergrads so it's going to be worth MUCH more than $50 per lead to them. They are a cash cow monster... doing around $2.5 BILLION total revenue a year last year.
 
Good call PocketRockets - I think sometimes we get so focused on our world and our ideas, that other companies who have a completely different business model and play in a different realm when it comes to media buying can crush us in certain placements.

We advertised on Comcast for awhile with a small display test on their homepage, but because large finance companies spending millions on branding and traffic also displayed, our little $5000 test got used up quickly and diluted with competing offers of companies spending $50,000 per day at least.

Smaller companies and affiliates have to keep being creative and very efficient to stay a few steps ahead of large companies that can afford to lose a lot more (or invest a lot more).

Stay innovative with ideas that can be shared on Wickedfire. Experiment and test. if you don't want to give away your secrets, at least share your failed tests so others can learn and not pay to learn the same lessons.

That will make WickedFire even more powerful.
 
When I first saw that google was going to allow cpc on site targetting I got excited about it, I had some success at cpm and thought cpc would be even better.

Wound up with mixed results, nothing to get excited over.

Then the discussion about blending image ads got me all hot and bothered again, but, meh, mixed results again. Definitely nothing to get hard over.

You'd think it would be easier to up your roi using site targeting over just the general content networt, but I haven't figured it out yet.
 
Google being more transparent with their content network and introducing placement targeting is definitely a good thing... you just need to pick your battles wisely.
 
Not sure you guys realize how big U of Phoenix really is ... you have to remember that tuition is going to be around $10,000 per year for undergrads so it's going to be worth MUCH more than $50 per lead to them. They are a cash cow monster... doing around $2.5 BILLION total revenue a year last year.

Very true.

University lead gen programs often work on a Cost Per Acquisition basis... Which means they might come to you and offer $500.00 bounty for every student admission. No need to get into it here, but if you do it correctly it can be very profitable.
 
Thanks for sharing the experiment.
Maybe I will test this out too. The trick might be to stay away from big sites with tons of traffic (where big ad spot buyers also play), and go for low- to mid-size sites with much less ad competition.

Less (but more targetted) traffic, yet still with the method of blending in the ads like xmcp123 did.
:)
 
Nice case study X. I'm sure all WF'ers applaud your contribution.

I'm thinking along the lines that ImagesAndWords was talking about. I'd bet that if you did the same strategy on a site about green tea or weight loss instead of a high traffic celeb gossip site that you could get pretty good results. I'm admittedly no expert on the content network or site targeting though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.