Background
A while back I saw the below banner and the bluriness freaked me out.
I floated the idea at WF that this could be an intentional tactic for getting visitors' attention, most people thought that this was a glitch or that I was douchetastic, and some people encouraged me to test this theory out. I put my money where my mouth is and the result is this case study.
Setup
I set out to create an adwords campaign, running on the content network with two banner ads: one blurry like the above, and one a sharp "control" ad. I picked a premium sunglass store to promote, based on the loose logic that people seeing a blurry ad might be concerned about their vision and will want to protect their eyes
. The keywords I targeted were celebrity and fashion related.
Test ad:
Control ad:
Results
I ran the campaign until I reached my budget for this test, at 246 clicks for 992,118 impressions. Here is a snapshot of the campaign's statistics at the end of the trial:
Up until about 80 clicks, both ads were in lock-step and there was absolutely no difference in the clickthrough. But towards the end, you can see that the sharp "control" ad won out by an extra 26 clicks (the control had a CTR of 0.0279% versus the blurry ad's CTR of 0.0232% ). I think the numbers are significant enough so that we can make some conclusions. My original hypothesis regarding the attention grabbing properties of blurry ads has proven to be wrong in this case.
Overall, the campaign itself did not result in any conversions. I attribute this to a somewhat unorthodox LP approach I took, and possibly to the nature of the content network itself.
I hope this case study is helpful for you,
- ZZ
A while back I saw the below banner and the bluriness freaked me out.

I floated the idea at WF that this could be an intentional tactic for getting visitors' attention, most people thought that this was a glitch or that I was douchetastic, and some people encouraged me to test this theory out. I put my money where my mouth is and the result is this case study.
Setup
I set out to create an adwords campaign, running on the content network with two banner ads: one blurry like the above, and one a sharp "control" ad. I picked a premium sunglass store to promote, based on the loose logic that people seeing a blurry ad might be concerned about their vision and will want to protect their eyes

Test ad:

Control ad:

Results
I ran the campaign until I reached my budget for this test, at 246 clicks for 992,118 impressions. Here is a snapshot of the campaign's statistics at the end of the trial:

Up until about 80 clicks, both ads were in lock-step and there was absolutely no difference in the clickthrough. But towards the end, you can see that the sharp "control" ad won out by an extra 26 clicks (the control had a CTR of 0.0279% versus the blurry ad's CTR of 0.0232% ). I think the numbers are significant enough so that we can make some conclusions. My original hypothesis regarding the attention grabbing properties of blurry ads has proven to be wrong in this case.
Overall, the campaign itself did not result in any conversions. I attribute this to a somewhat unorthodox LP approach I took, and possibly to the nature of the content network itself.
I hope this case study is helpful for you,
- ZZ