CMS: with or without DB?

[nator]

Hi,

I've been creating static bridge pages for my aff ppc campaigns but I'm beginning the natural switch towards building wider sites with more content.

Can anyone suggest a CMS option to fit this scenario? Should I use a CMS at all? If yes, would drupal/wordpress do? I mean, they are based on DB and loading time could affect quality score...

Cheers

 

[iisbum]

Wordpress and Drupal have very good caching options that make the site loading very close to static html files, whilst giving you the advantages of a fully blow CMS.

Without knowing more about what kind of content sites you're planning to build hard to give recommendations.

 

[omgyams]

If you have a good host the difference shouldn't be considerable.

 

[glowleaf]

Static sites are a thing of the past. We now make dynamic sites, with caching to make them temporarily static.

There is also a new plugin, super cache something for wp, I have yet to try it. But there are options available.

 

[bobsoap]

Static sites are a thing of the past. We now make dynamic sites, with caching to make them temporarily static.

There is also a new plugin, super cache something for wp, I have yet to try it. But there are options available.

WordPress › WP Super Cache « WordPress Plugins

Not so new actually, but great indeed, I agree. Definitely a must.

 

[directresponse]

Wordpress is the way to go.