CPA Juice legit?

S

sonicmikeb

New member
Mar 22, 2011
26
1
0
I saw they had a credit report I am running elsewhere so I thought i would sign up just to split test. I got immediately approved. The offer I wanted was on 'apply to run' so I applied with my PPV lander got denied and then my account got banned before I ever ran a click. The lander by the way does not have any of the bank logos on it and is compliant.

They won't even respond to me. I say "they" but I am wondering if I should say 'he"

It appears to be a 1-man-band, Tyler Pratt. I won't jump to conclusions just yet but and wait to hear from other WF Members.
 


For the hundred-thousandth time, where the fuck do people find these networks and why does everyone feel the need to slap "CPA" and some random word together and call themselves a leading advertising network with exclusive offers and the best support.
 
lol Juice? Cmon, can't people come up with better names these days?

"We can Juice up your bank account!"
"Put some Juice into your campaigns!"
 
I have my steady 3 networks that I run with for as long as I can remember and have not really ventured out. Looking for more sources for credit reports.
 
jeffrey said:
For the hundred-thousandth time, where the fuck do people find these networks and why does everyone feel the need to slap "CPA" and some random word together and call themselves a leading advertising network with exclusive offers and the best support.
Click to expand...

As much as that is true in almost all cases, I've had a pretty good experience with a not that well known network. Saw a small network have a payout 50% higher than the max bump the large networks were willing to give. I ran with them hard from the start, got paid on time all the time. Things went great. Ended up making an extra $xx,xxx running with them instead of the larger networks. Till this day that network isn't that well known, but I know a bunch of people that push rebill volume with them now.

Networks such as Azoogle and NeverBlue have a lot of overhead costs such as salary for all their AM's; it all cuts down into the payout margin they take. These small networks have usually are run by 1-3 people, may just be renting out small office etc; so they can afford to pay more and so on. I'm not defending CPA Juice in anyway, since this is the first time I've heard about that. I'm just trying to say that there are reasons for running with smaller networks. It's all part of risk vs reward.

Edit: I also want to mention that smaller legit networks seem to care more about you getting your payment. Since they know that in the early stage of development, if they receive any negative publicly, they are done for. No one will signup with a new/smaller network that has bad press already. Awhile larger networks are willing to take some hits on bad press since they know that they are still doing good for the majority.
 
mGrunin said:
As much as that is true in almost all cases, I've had a pretty good experience with a not that well known network. Saw a small network have a payout 50% higher than the max bump the large networks were willing to give. I ran with them hard from the start, got paid on time all the time. Things went great. Ended up making an extra $xx,xxx running with them instead of the larger networks. Till this day that network isn't that well known, but I know a bunch of people that push rebill volume with them now.

Networks such as Azoogle and NeverBlue have a lot of overhead costs such as salary for all their AM's; it all cuts down into the payout margin they take. These small networks have usually are run by 1-3 people, may just be renting out small office etc; so they can afford to pay more and so on. I'm not defending CPA Juice in anyway, since this is the first time I've heard about that. I'm just trying to say that there are reasons for running with smaller networks. It's all part of risk vs reward.

Edit: I also want to mention that smaller legit networks seem to care more about you getting your payment. Since they know that in the early stage of development, if they receive any negative publicly, they are done for. No one will signup with a new/smaller network that has bad press already. Awhile larger networks are willing to take some hits on bad press since they know that they are still doing good for the majority.
Click to expand...

Oh I have worked with quite a few smaller networks, I'm not saying they are a scam or are a bad network, I'm saying in general there's been a slew of what seem to be new affiliates who add random words to CPA and begin a shitty hasoffers network. Not badmouthing smaller networks, really just ranting about the idiots ruining the industry.
 
I guess he has his hands full with biz dev, being an AM, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, compliance, pr, loading offers, what else and just didn't want to overextend himself with another pub.

Maybe he got offended because I asked for $26 which is what I am getting elsewhere for the offer and he had it streeted for $17.
 
mGrunin said:
As much as that is true in almost all cases, I've had a pretty good experience with a not that well known network. Saw a small network have a payout 50% higher than the max bump the large networks were willing to give. I ran with them hard from the start, got paid on time all the time. Things went great. Ended up making an extra $xx,xxx running with them instead of the larger networks. Till this day that network isn't that well known, but I know a bunch of people that push rebill volume with them now.

Networks such as Azoogle and NeverBlue have a lot of overhead costs such as salary for all their AM's; it all cuts down into the payout margin they take. These small networks have usually are run by 1-3 people, may just be renting out small office etc; so they can afford to pay more and so on. I'm not defending CPA Juice in anyway, since this is the first time I've heard about that. I'm just trying to say that there are reasons for running with smaller networks. It's all part of risk vs reward.

Edit: I also want to mention that smaller legit networks seem to care more about you getting your payment. Since they know that in the early stage of development, if they receive any negative publicly, they are done for. No one will signup with a new/smaller network that has bad press already. Awhile larger networks are willing to take some hits on bad press since they know that they are still doing good for the majority.
Click to expand...


Although those guy's network name sounds pretty retarded I Have to agree with mGrunin.

However you slice it the small networks would have to pay :
Small Office
1 to 4 Salaries

Large networks have to pay:
Big-ass Office
10-30 + Salaries.

Its simple as that. More money that needs to be paid, you know it has to come from somewhere right ? Thats why Big Companies Shave More leads or give lower pay-outs since if 1 advertiser backs-out of the deal they have to pay it out of their own money, but they can't afford it so they just don't pay for the leads from a scammer Advertiser.


But the good thing with large CPAs is that they got a MUCH wider selection of offers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom