Pace's articles would be OK if he didn't censor his comments. Pace loves to delete anything that isn't favorable to him. He has been deleting my comments about his self serving posts for weeks now.
Take it for what its worth, rehashed BS spun to make Pace's position look better. FB hates edu ads due to his networks inability to monitor the compliance of those offers themselves. (funny how he posted weeks ago about a networks ability to be compliant, what a joke) His network was supposedly specifically banned from FB for the obama EDU ads they allowed pubs to run. If he didnt help affiliates push the envelope in search of profits, then maybe FB wouldn't hate pubs and his article wouldn't need to be written
Pace you take shots at people expect them to shoot back! WF doesnt censor so feel free to respond.
As an FYI my gripe with Pace is his post about Copeac being party to a class action lawsuit that EVERY network was hit with, however it was a better story for Pace to point out us in his article. He failed to mention that the same firm sued his company 2 years ago and actually got a big settlement from them, he also goes on to talk about the suit being hazardous to pubs and they should work with a network with a good compliance team protecting publishers, guess your compliance team couldnt protect pubs from being banned off facebook huh?