Fucking wikipedia idiots

[dsm56]

What the fuck is these fascist idiots' problem? I mean you add your own site, not even in a spamming fashion, just create an individual page with a description on it, and the editors have a fucking vote on whether to remove it, because its a relatively new site.

My site is 4 months old, a hungarian one (so consider theres only a 13m audience max), and gets 700 visitors a day already. I mean fuck you, stupid cunts. I bet they sit there wanking off how much power they have on their stupid encyclopedia. Which is supposed to be editable by anyone btw.

I hate it when retards are given a small bit of power and they really want to ride it.

Im so fucking pissed off, but i feel better now.

 

[illusion]

Step 1, create an auto link submitter so you can constantly piss them off. But make sure you watch the discuss page to check if they are going to ban the domain, and if they are close

Step 2, throw in a random discussion from a user saying, "Hey I stumbled across this site today, looks pretty good, let's add it", and as long as it isn't www.some-random-ass-domain-with-a-ton-of-keywords.info you should be good

 

[guysmy]

Just when you're about to thrash them, remember... they have no fucking life. I pity the fools.

 

[barman]

Just like the assholes on dmoz and digg. Gatekeepers of the internet that still live with their parents, policing the internet one unacceptable piece of content at a time.

 

[Deliguy]

cocky editors is what destroyed dmoz. All it did was motivate the spammers(haha yeah i'm dmoz editor). next is wiki. Have fun going down bitches.

 

[int_josh]

get this into your brain: there are A LOT of people who are anti-making money and anti-"you having a good thing going".

The faster you realize this, the more indifferent you'll become to people trying to rain on your parade.

 

[wie08e54]

Szia,

Behave yourself, you look like a white pussy.
Honnestly, why do you expect people to swallow your spam?
Just be honnest, it was spam. It could have get in, it didn't. Forget it (or show me the articles about your website in the britanicus encyclopedia and the universalis encyclopedia).


BTW, there is less than 3M connected hungarian people so 700 uniques per day is really good (as soon as they are hungarian )

 

[Deliguy]

good point.
unfortunately for the internet community, indifference doesn't put money in my account, beating the cocky geeks does

 

[Stanley]

Step 2, throw in a random discussion from a user saying, "Hey I stumbled across this site today, looks pretty good, let's add it", and as long as it isn't www.some-random-ass-domain-with-a-ton-of-keywords.info you should be good

neat idea. do you add your link to external sites after some time have past, or you wait for them to add it themselves?

 

[randomlande]

i hate people that just live to catch other people do shit thats against the rules. they just make me wanna slap in the face with a rubber cock.

 

[illusion]

neat idea. do you add your link to external sites after some time have past, or you wait for them to add it themselves?

I never add it from my IP, I login to my user of a year or something and start a discussion about the domain so that they never know I own the site. Then I say hey let's add this site. Then after about 2-7 days it is added. If they tell you the site is irrelevant I got a few articles that I show them that have stupid links and they usually turn the bad side

 

[sebastya]

hah, tell me about it. Wikipedia sucks.

 

[$5 Submissions]

Another approach would be to strictly follow their content quality guidelines and really pack your main pages with helpful info. Put the pages with upsell links or affiliate ads on subpages which are more specific. You may find yourself accomplishing two things: getting on wikipedia as a resource and filtering your subpage traffic pretty heavily (increasing the likelihood of qualified clicks).

 

[Setec]

On the one hand, I'm glad Wikipedia stays relatively free of crap. Most people think their own sites are great and submit them, when they're actually shit. I'm glad they get policed.

But I have one site which is the most respected, useful, popular educational resource for its niche, and it was on the relevant Wikipedia page for several months, but some Wiki rules prick came along and removed it because it's got Google ads. Complete bullshit.

They need to update their policy on external links to reflect the fact that sites without any monetization usually suck ass because nobody can afford to put tons of work and hosting fees into a site that isn't making any money. They'll never have anything but shit links to DMOZ unless they start allowing high-quality monetized sites as a matter of policy.

 

[dsm56]

Very good point, free sites can't afford to be decent, (unless theyre government funded)