Google discusses about link building

[micfire]

Google Discusses Link Building Strategies

For some time now link building for Google has been a pain in the ass since Google has been refining their back link algo all the time. When you check back links for certain site in Yahoo and then in Google, you'll notice a very big difference. 99,9% of the link traders haven't figured it out why this happens and continue trading links in old style with link pages. This makes it difficult to find useful link partners.

My wish is that Google would discard all link pages. It would be much harder to link spam, and "honest" links would stick better.

It seems that now Google finally admits that they are counting links differently so it's not some conspiracy to give misinformation to SEO people when checking back links.

 

[John]

great find

 

[Intranet]

bfft not that useful but interesting nevertheless

 

[Intranet]

Jon whats the deal with the rep hate? I'm down to negative 100 million. What is the definition 'valuable' post? John, a moderdator posted 'great find' and that OK but my post isn't? Some guys have over 1000 posts. I can't imagine they are all useful.

 

[illusion]

Jon whats the deal with the rep hate? I'm down to negative 100 million. What is the definition 'valuable' post? John, a moderdator posted 'great find' and that OK but my post isn't? Some guys have over 1000 posts. I can't imagine they are all useful.

Let's step back in time, and have a look at your first 5 posts
Number 1 Post: looks tasty
Number 2 Post: yea
Number 3 Post: too much leakage. You want adsense clicks. Not non-adsense clicks.
Number 4 Post: good idea
Number 5 Post: bfft who cares digg sucks balls anyway

Continued......

Now piss off back to EF