Guy lights 3-year old niece on fire
- Thread starter Lpdesigner
- Start date
Given the nature of the crime, why even bother with allowing bail? This is just bout as sick as the guy who killed his 2 year old step daughter because she wasn't saying things like 'please', 'sir', 'thank you' etc.
Being taken out back and shot would be far too quick and humane by comparison to what he's done.
Number one shut the fuck up, sometimes you gotta leave the jokes alone.
In the US we have violence that is skyrocketing and it is because our court systems and the punishments are so lenient. It may not stop them all but a lot of crime would be stopped if they received punishment aside from getting three meals a day, shelter, a tv, and snacks for free the rest of their lives.
Once he is convicted, he will be suffering for many years ...Based on an interior hierarchy. Inmates who commit crimes against children are the lowest in the chain. He will be "reminded" on a daily basis of what he has done.
No matter what, this will never be enough for what he has done to this child.
-=Chipmunk=-
No matter what, this will never be enough for what he has done to this child.
-=Chipmunk=-
got any stats to back up your claim? here are some:
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
note the second chart under violent crime and murder. oh noes, CNN was wrong!
Hi everyone, I'm new here as you probably noticed. I was looking for information on how to add a signature when I came across this horrible story.
Firstly,
Secondly,
How did this happen? How could things have gone this far? The parents or guardians of this 17-year-old male didn't notice they had a sick bastard in their home? With disturbing attacks like this, this couldn't have been the first time that boy did something that should have had him put in a mental institution, or jail, for the rest of his life. And he was left around a small child that cannot defend herself. The parents or guardians should be brought up on charges of the highest degree of negligence. They knew he was a problem. If you have the ability to pour lighter fluid on an innocent 3-year-old child, then proceed to light that innocent child on fire with the intent of a slow painful death, what other sick madness and havoc wreaking had he already been doing during all 17 years of his existence?
I really hope the justice system handles this to the furthest extent possible. This boy should never be put back on the street, ever to see the light of day again.
Firstly,
I second that notion, especially the rinsing and repeating.:disgust:
Secondly,
How did this happen? How could things have gone this far? The parents or guardians of this 17-year-old male didn't notice they had a sick bastard in their home? With disturbing attacks like this, this couldn't have been the first time that boy did something that should have had him put in a mental institution, or jail, for the rest of his life. And he was left around a small child that cannot defend herself. The parents or guardians should be brought up on charges of the highest degree of negligence. They knew he was a problem. If you have the ability to pour lighter fluid on an innocent 3-year-old child, then proceed to light that innocent child on fire with the intent of a slow painful death, what other sick madness and havoc wreaking had he already been doing during all 17 years of his existence?
I really hope the justice system handles this to the furthest extent possible. This boy should never be put back on the street, ever to see the light of day again.
Having kids myself and one that has just turned 3. I would bail this fucker out or jail and teach him a lonnnnnnnnng fucking lesson.
I agree with Rogue Girl, this kid obviously had issues and I am sure they where apparent before this incident.
I agree with Rogue Girl, this kid obviously had issues and I am sure they where apparent before this incident.
It becomes civil when you propose the idea to a panel of inhuman monsters, and they take time to decide on it, as opposed to spontaneously lighting a kid on fire.
who knows maybe he planned it and wanted an excuse.
Even if this was true what would it have to do with this case? You think this guy sat down and thought about the consequences and then decided they were lenient enough to go ahead? You think he's just getting a slap on the wrist now?
I have a problem with arguments like the above because they take accountability away from the individual. If everyone is just a criminal waiting to be properly punished then it is practically expected of me to commit crime. We should reinforce the fact that we expect each other to do the right thing as a society. Threat of punishment is not effective because it simply asks someone to look out for their own comfort as opposed to making a choice because it is right/wrong.