Funny for like two seconds but shameless and stupid. Way to further lower employee morale and the prospect of hiring good talent in the future - not to mention looking like an ass to potential customers.
The union, which has not specified its exact complaint, may have been upset that the dealership's contractor hired a non-union shop for renovations.
So if you don't hire someone in the union, they send union workers out to hold defamatory signs and fuck your business? Neat.
So why doesnt wickedfire form a union so that if you do not hire our bst workers we will send them out to use defamatory tactics to fuck your business? Neat idea.
So if you don't hire someone in the union, they send union workers out to hold defamatory signs and fuck your business? Neat.
..They're the tactics of local labor unions nationwide, which picket businesses accused of poor worker treatment and in the process inflict some financial pain in the form of unwelcome attention.
Other carpentry unions often recruit and pay their protestors, since the carpenters themselves have jobs to fill.)
Funny for like two seconds but shameless and stupid. Way to further lower employee morale and the prospect of hiring good talent in the future - not to mention looking like an ass to potential customers.
Basically, fucking extortion.
LOL. If you think that's extortion, which it is not,
![]()
I'm pretty sure it is extortion, since they are seeking to obtain jobs for their fucking buddies by threatening to picket a business.
The legal definition of extortion has nothing to do with this argument. Extortion as a concept is defined as per the above, and the threats to picket are both implicit and explicit. No fucking union in the world just sets up shop and starts picketing without first trying to shake down a business owner, and the big stick they carry to the fucking meeting is the threat of a picket line, because thankfully, they can't do anything else.So many things wrong with your post.
First, you're citing a dictionary, which is LOL - as if a dictionary has any legal authority as to the meaning of extortion.
Second, it's not "their [] buddies." It's the union's "members," which a union has a legal duty to fairly represent.
Third, where do you see the union "threatening to picket a business?" I see a sign, which could be argued is picketing, but I don't see a threat to picket.
A dedicated Teamsters Union worker was attending a convention in Las Vegas and decided to check out the local brothels nearby.
When he got to the first one, he asked the Madam, "Is this a union house?"
"No," she replied, "I'm sorry it isn't."
"Well, if I pay you $100 what cut do the girls get?"
"The house gets $80.00 and the girls get $20.00."
Mightily offended at such unfair dealings, the man stomped off down the street in search of a more equitable, hopefully unionized shop.
His search continued until finally he reached a brothel where the Madam responded, "Why yes sir, this is a Union House."
The man asked, "And if I pay you $100 what cut do the girls get?"
The girls get $80.00 and the house gets $20."
"That's more like it!!!".
So he handed the Madam $100, looked around the room and pointed to a stunningly attractive blonde, "I'd like her for the night."
"I'm sure you would, sir," said the Madam, gesturing to an 80 year old woman in the corner, "But Gracy here has Seniority."
So if you don't hire someone in the union, they send union workers out to hold defamatory signs and fuck your business? Neat.