Yeah it's reached the same level, and though not as much radiation has been released as Chernobyl, it's the long term problems that you can't put a number on.Just because they declared it a 7 on some scale doesn't mean it's anywhere as bad as Chernobyl.
Oh yeah, thanks for the reminder.But I heard somewhere that nuclear power is safe
Yeah it's reached the same level, and though not as much radiation has been released as Chernobyl, it's the long term problems that you can't put a number on.
Shows how dangerous these things can be though, especially for those working to stabilise it.
7 is just the highest that rating system goes. I guess we need a better rating system. From what I understand, Chernobyl is still a lot worse.
It's kind of like seeing a really ugly girl and saying, "Man, that chick is ugly. She's like a 1 on a scale from 1 to 10." And then you see a gorilla with its head beaten in with a baseball bat, crawling with insects and covered with feces and maggots. Yeah, that's worse, but the damn system only goes down to 1.
It is the same level, but it isn't, as explained here.No, it hasn't even come close to reaching the same level, and fear and rumor mongering isn't helping matters any.
That's the problem when you over exaggerate something on any ratings system. Be nice to her and give her a 2.7 is just the highest that rating system goes. I guess we need a better rating system. From what I understand, Chernobyl is still a lot worse.
It's kind of like seeing a really ugly girl and saying, "Man, that chick is ugly. She's like a 1 on a scale from 1 to 10." And then you see a gorilla with its head beaten in with a baseball bat, crawling with insects and covered with feces and maggots. Yeah, that's worse, but the damn system only goes down to 1.
no more sushi for me