Here goes...I think you should never delete any keywords. Why? Let me tell you about the frog that decided it would jump half way across a pond. So he did so. Then he decided to jump half way again. He kept on doing this to infinity and never reached the other side!
That is the problem with keywords. Your CPA offer pays out $35 and you have spent 50 cents per click on a keyword, got 70 clicks and spent $35. No sales. So what to do? I know, lets reduce the bid. If I delete the keyword, I may have lost out on an opportunity to make money long term on it, since more clicks could lead to a sale.
Consider this, even on a bad keyword it is likely to provide a sale if you left it running for years! So the question is not so much whether or not a keyword will be profitable, but rather at what bid will that keyword be profitable. It may take 1000 clicks for a less targeted keyword to produce a sale. But that is fine, so long as your bid is less than $35/1000=$0.035.
Therein lies my problem, I have been keeping all my keywords and not pausing any! Instead, I just reduce the bids.
Question to the experienced crowd: do you do this and if not, why not?
Thanks,
Jon
That is the problem with keywords. Your CPA offer pays out $35 and you have spent 50 cents per click on a keyword, got 70 clicks and spent $35. No sales. So what to do? I know, lets reduce the bid. If I delete the keyword, I may have lost out on an opportunity to make money long term on it, since more clicks could lead to a sale.
Consider this, even on a bad keyword it is likely to provide a sale if you left it running for years! So the question is not so much whether or not a keyword will be profitable, but rather at what bid will that keyword be profitable. It may take 1000 clicks for a less targeted keyword to produce a sale. But that is fine, so long as your bid is less than $35/1000=$0.035.
Therein lies my problem, I have been keeping all my keywords and not pausing any! Instead, I just reduce the bids.
Question to the experienced crowd: do you do this and if not, why not?
Thanks,
Jon