NO MORE Engrish™ - Quality Unique Content from NATIVE English writers!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rankdominator

Backlink master
Dec 12, 2008
73
0
0
www.rankdominator.com
Rating - 100%
12   0   0
Rankdominator here,

I run a business where quality content is paramount, but I have really struggled to find NATIVE English speaking article writers that can produce quality at a good price.

Trust me, I have tried many article writers, on most forums and even some here, and what I have found is absolutely shocking.

Seriously , I got so tired of receiving "Engrish" articles and having to re-do them - I decided to go out and hire my own team. And now they are available to YOU too ...


Problems with other Article Providers:

Broken promises : - never delivering on time, or delivering content that is really just filled with fluff and not according to your needs

"Engrish" : - They say you get what you pay for, but SERIOUSLY, I have had so-called English graduates producing some content that is just GARBAGE (and at over $2 per 100 words) - I pretty much had to re-write each article .... wasted money as well as wasted time ...



The Solution!


The NO MORE Engrish™ Content Team!!



Our Services:

Quality content: This is genuine unique quality content - put it on your money page, put it on your Web 2.0 pages, put it wherever you want and require quality content !!

Guaranteed unique: Each piece of content is Copyscape passed - guaranteed unique content!!

No More Engrish™ : - Guaranteed readable content - that makes sense and flows nicely !! No grammar or spelling mistakes - no need to rewrite your articles EVER again!!


Pricing:

At just $1.50 per 100 words, you cannot go wrong!!
We may be more expensive than your usual garbage content writers – but then again - those in the KNOW pay for quality!


How to get hold of us:

GTalk: rankdominator
Email: rankdominator@gmail.com


Review Copies and Samples:

50% discount for a single 500 word article for the first 3 orders

REVIEW copies will ONLY be provided to users with 10+ iTrader and over 200 posts - as per the rules (see sticky) - I do not want to be banned :-)
 
Last edited:


PBHkA.gif

I will take a third review... but need to be more than 500 words.
If I find any shred of evidence that the article is written by anyone but a native Citizen, I will shred you apart. And I will know when an article has even a slightest hint of Indian English, or recent immigrant English...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jorarulit
@blogspotter - happy to have it more than 500 words - will still offer the 50% discount. Guaranteed that work is by NATIVE English speakers - no recent immigrant or anything of the sort...

@shifatbd - Can also offer you a 4th review if you want - will PM you now..
 
Just a quick update - I have been made aware of the review policy of WF - namely only reviews by users with 10+ iTrader and over 200 posts.

So - according to that, currently only 2 users match that:
Angelo
blogpsotter

Meaning I have 1 more review price available.

For those other members with lower posts and iTrader counts - I will honor the review price for your article

Please note that I am not here to get fake reviews or whatever - just an oversight in terms of the Reviews policy which I did not know applied to the Content Section as well.

As an update - Angelo has been provided their article - and review should be forthcoming

Thanks
Rankdominator
 
All 3 reviews have been taken:

Angelo
blogspotter
omgyams

Articles have been completed for these users - and they are just awaiting distribution. (sent to Angelo already)

Hopefully reviews will be forthcoming soon.
 
Review

I really doubt this was written by a native english speaker. Here's a sample to support my opinion:

Planning your kitchen renovation is crucial to ensure you do not create an elegant and stylish looking kitchen, but one that is beset with typical problems that could have been avoided from the outset.
Click to expand...

That small piece is not characteristic of the entire article - it's a sore spot on an otherwise well-written article. But it's something that needs to be ironed out if you're going to be taken seriously with your aggressive sales pitch.

The article opens with an introduction, present a problem, discuss the problem, poses solutions and ties everything up in the closing paragraph. Grammar and punctuation are both very good. For all the shitty content I've ordered on WF, the articles rarely had a structure at all, let alone a good one.

Taking the cost, quality and expectations set by the OP in mind I'd give the service a 4/5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Staccs
Thanks omgyams for the review

Point taken regarding the sentence - it reads in the "negative" and as such probably does not "read nicely" - so have sent you a revised sentence to replace it with.

However - I do feel that your opinion on 1 sentence out of the 750+words provided is slightly harsh on the Native English wording front - as I really do not see or view the sentence quoted as not coming from an English native. I would know - since I wrote that sentence to try and tie up your conclusion to your topic ... so yes - admit the sentence structure is not the best and potentially non-sensical - but a single error within the full article should not lead you to your harsh conclusion.

Nonetheless - willing to offer free revisions to anyone that is not satisfied with their content - as Im looking for sustainable long term business - and can assure ALL users that this is NATIVE English work

Potentially quote some other pieces of the work so that it does not affect my overall sales thread.

Happy with a 4/5 rating (well not really - we strive for perfection) - just not comfortable that you are questioning the main aspect of my sales pitch (the native English part) - but I am happy to take criticism - so the offer above stands

Since the content was for a guest blog post - potentially see whether the blogger would be posting your piece with the updated content - and then come back with an update?

Sorry - please do not take offence - but I had to respond to the questioning of the English - and your comment "really doubt" - based on a single sentence, and considering this is my main "Sales Differentiator" - I would like to set the record straight.

Thanks and regards
 
Last edited:
I also won't rate the article very highly..
I won't get into details, as you obviously don't take criticism in good stride, as you replied above.

The article may have been written by a Native, and the Grammar is OK, but your usage of words need some improvement. And you need to keep it simple...

And of course, this is only my opinion. I need to be honest with my review. I am always fair in my review..

But I think people can give him a try and take it from there.
I am sure some people will like his style of writing..

I just don't like the usage of certain words and sentences, as omygyams mentioned above.
 
Thanks for the review

Obviously writing style is a personal thing - so no offence taken at all.

Happy for you to quote any particulars that were not to your satisfaction - and since we do offer free revisions - happy to fix anything not to your liking. Obviously writing style is something that will be difficult to amend.

In terms of the criticism of the previous review - my point is that I take umbrage to the questioning of the Native English - and since we need to pay for these threads - I do feel that I have a right to respond to ensure that 1 person's opinion does not affect any further sales.

Nonetheless - I will take the criticism on the chin as they say, and move forward with my business and article writing and amend where appropriate

Thanks
 
I ordered a product review and received well researched article in a few hours. There are no grammatical or spelling errors and I'm very happy with the quality.
 
rankdominator said:
I do feel that your opinion on 1 sentence out of the 750+words provided is slightly harsh on the Native English wording front - as I really do not see or view the sentence quoted as not coming from an English native.
Click to expand...

Including the excerpt was just to help WF users understand what I was talking about. I did not base the entire review on one sentence - the review was based on the entire article. I should have been more clear on that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom