Passive Income Hacker vs. Startup Guy



Seems like the "start up guy" is fucking butthurt because the hacker is making dough without doing all the useless bullshit that the start up dude thinks is necessary.
 
It's amazing how many of the HN commenters did not seem to pick up on the fact that it was satire.

Insert engineer joke here.


I was about to make the exact same comment.

Then again, the first WFer to respond also grappled with subtext 101. It makes me uneasy.
 

OP are you fucking serious? I've been architecting web-enabled e-services for a while now and agree that targeting real-time deliverables has helped streamline our enterprise applications.

Recently with emp's help in re-intermediating dynamic web-readiness while morphing next-generation infrastructures has helped with our drive in viral niches while embracing collaborative methodologies. The biggest advantage we now have is the ability to facilitate intuitive bandwidth without reducing incentivization to end-to-end e-services which has helped unleash turn-key e-commerce.

Then even Bofu2u came in at the end to retarget and repurpose seamless partnerships while scaling cutting-edge interfaces and enabling synergistic e-business. I commend the team and congratulate them on benchmarking vertical platforms at the same time of re-contextualizing ALL distributed applications.

I think If all businesses simply enhanced vertical infrastructures they'd be able to harness mission-critical users while meshing seamless web services and driving end-to-end platforms.​
 

OP are you fucking serious? I've been architecting web-enabled e-services for a while now and agree that targeting real-time deliverables has helped streamline our enterprise applications.

Recently with emp's help in re-intermediating dynamic web-readiness while morphing next-generation infrastructures has helped with our drive in viral niches while embracing collaborative methodologies. The biggest advantage we now have is the ability to facilitate intuitive bandwidth without reducing incentivization to end-to-end e-services which has helped unleash turn-key e-commerce.

Then even Bofu2u came in at the end to retarget and repurpose seamless partnerships while scaling cutting-edge interfaces and enabling synergistic e-business. I commend the team and congratulate them on benchmarking vertical platforms at the same time of re-contextualizing ALL distributed applications.

I think If all businesses simply enhanced vertical infrastructures they'd be able to harness mission-critical users while meshing seamless web services and driving end-to-end platforms.​

Who are you, and what did you do with CCarter? He's all folded up in your freezer, isn't he?
 
Who are you, and what did you do with CCarter? He's all folded up in your freezer, isn't he?

Wot do you mean M8? Funny this reminds me of a great way to redefine e-business networks while orchestrating dynamic e-tailers. It's really comes down to engineering wireless infrastructures while facilitating the proactive experiences. Just make sure to expedite granular action-items while productizing distributed technologies in order to drive more bricks-and-clicks eyeballs.

I know Pheasants created the perfect scenario for re-intermediating dot-com infrastructures. I've regularly used his approach to enhance leading-edge e-tailers while scaling one-to-one systems.

Carry on...​
 

OP are you fucking serious? I've been architecting web-enabled e-services for a while now and agree that targeting real-time deliverables has helped streamline our enterprise applications.

Recently with emp's help in re-intermediating dynamic web-readiness while morphing next-generation infrastructures has helped with our drive in viral niches while embracing collaborative methodologies. The biggest advantage we now have is the ability to facilitate intuitive bandwidth without reducing incentivization to end-to-end e-services which has helped unleash turn-key e-commerce.

Then even Bofu2u came in at the end to retarget and repurpose seamless partnerships while scaling cutting-edge interfaces and enabling synergistic e-business. I commend the team and congratulate them on benchmarking vertical platforms at the same time of re-contextualizing ALL distributed applications.

I think If all businesses simply enhanced vertical infrastructures they'd be able to harness mission-critical users while meshing seamless web services and driving end-to-end platforms.​
original.gif
 
Wot do you mean M8? Funny this reminds me of a great way to redefine e-business networks while orchestrating dynamic e-tailers. It's really comes down to engineering wireless infrastructures while facilitating the proactive experiences. Just make sure to expedite granular action-items while productizing distributed technologies in order to drive more bricks-and-clicks eyeballs.

I know Pheasants created the perfect scenario for re-intermediating dot-com infrastructures. I've regularly used his approach to enhance leading-edge e-tailers while scaling one-to-one systems.

Carry on...​

On the contrary, I think you've slightly misunderstood my approach.. With all due respect.

My primary focus is to scale out-of-the-box convergence in an effort to disintermediate value-added experiences, not the other way around. It seems trivial, but it makes a huge difference when you're trying to aggregate back-end deliverables.

Once you're able to orchestrate out-of-the-box deliverables and engage synergistic web services to do the same, you've more or less got a license to print money.
 

Let me help you understand. The universal variable formulation works well with the variation of parameters technique, except now. Instead of the six Keplerian orbital elements, we use a different set of orbital elements: namely, the business' initial position and velocity vectors x_0 and v_0 at a given epoch t = 0. In a two-body simulation, these elements are sufficient to compute the business' position and velocity at any time in the future, using the universal variable formulation. Conversely, at any moment in the business' orbit, we can measure its position and velocity, and then use the universal variable approach to determine what its initial position and velocity would have been at the epoch.
 
Shots fired… I'm going to fire right back...​

On the contrary, I think you've slightly misunderstood my approach.. With all due respect.

My primary focus is to scale out-of-the-box convergence in an effort to disintermediate value-added experiences, not the other way around. It seems trivial, but it makes a huge difference when you're trying to aggregate back-end deliverables.

Once you're able to orchestrate out-of-the-box deliverables and engage synergistic web services to do the same, you've more or less got a license to print money.

Frankly and with all due respect as an envisioneer of open-source platforms I've been optimizing cross-platform experiences for decades. Where-as you are barely about to leverage efficient niches without an evolving transparent infrastructures. Do you even mesh killer channels? When you get your head out your ass start integrating turn-key web-readiness while being about to expedite dot-com networks and optimize ubiquitous networks, you can come and talk to me about aggregating dot-com partnerships.​

Let me help you understand. The universal variable formulation works well with the variation of parameters technique, except now. Instead of the six Keplerian orbital elements, we use a different set of orbital elements: namely, the business' initial position and velocity vectors x_0 and v_0 at a given epoch t = 0. In a two-body simulation, these elements are sufficient to compute the business' position and velocity at any time in the future, using the universal variable formulation. Conversely, at any moment in the business' orbit, we can measure its position and velocity, and then use the universal variable approach to determine what its initial position and velocity would have been at the epoch.

This brings up a great point, while unleashing B2B portals a team should visualize front-end vortals while architecting viral technologies with a whiteboard dynamic deliverables mentality. I know several that utilize 24/7 portals while empowering one-to-one mindshare in order to monetize open-source networks; Revolutionizing ubiquitous eyeballs still creates benchmarks in bleeding-edge interfaces but can lead to utilizing user-centric platforms which will transition mission-critical functionalities without compromising evolving front-end niches, unlike Pheasant's approach.​
 
Shots fired… I'm going to fire right back...​
Frankly and with all due respect as an envisioneer of open-source platforms I've been optimizing cross-platform experiences for decades. Where-as you are barely about to leverage efficient niches without an evolving transparent infrastructures. Do you even mesh killer channels? When you get your head out your ass start integrating turn-key web-readiness while being about to expedite dot-com networks and optimize ubiquitous networks, you can come and talk to me about aggregating dot-com partnerships.​
This brings up a great point, while unleashing B2B portals a team should visualize front-end vortals while architecting viral technologies with a whiteboard dynamic deliverables mentality. I know several that utilize 24/7 portals while empowering one-to-one mindshare in order to monetize open-source networks; Revolutionizing ubiquitous eyeballs still creates benchmarks in bleeding-edge interfaces but can lead to utilizing user-centric platforms which will transition mission-critical functionalities without compromising evolving front-end niches, unlike Pheasant's approach.​

LOL, Head out of MY ass?

hPxAB6e.gif


Do you think this is 1998? When all it took to envision frictionless web-readiness and incentivize robust e-business was to throw a dart at the wall and hit a balloon? C'mon, you know better than that. You MUST be trolling me.

Do I even mesh killer channels? Srs bro? I've even linked you to some of my killer channels so stop trying to be cute.

Anyways, I've got to get back to work.. I've almost had a breakthrough on a new way to embrace virtual functionalities without having to empower holistic functionalities, so needless to say I've got better things to do with my time.

But if you ask nicely, I might teach you about how to disintermediate sticky interfaces in a way that doesn't look like a toddler did it.
 
Pheasant and CCarter?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGbzKUmgmrM"]In Living Color Oswald Bates I Won't Drift Away Season 2 Episode 5 - YouTube[/ame]
 
LOL, Head out of MY ass?

hPxAB6e.gif


Do you think this is 1998? When all it took to envision frictionless web-readiness and incentivize robust e-business was to throw a dart at the wall and hit a balloon? C'mon, you know better than that. You MUST be trolling me.

Do I even mesh killer channels? Srs bro? I've even linked you to some of my killer channels so stop trying to be cute.

Anyways, I've got to get back to work.. I've almost had a breakthrough on a new way to embrace virtual functionalities without having to empower holistic functionalities, so needless to say I've got better things to do with my time.

But if you ask nicely, I might teach you about how to disintermediate sticky interfaces in a way that doesn't look like a toddler did it.

I admit my initial reaction may have been a little harsh. I think we can all agree that incentivizing 24/365 functionalities has helped exploit end-to-end eyeballs while iterating mission-critical platforms. By architecting strategic systems while simultaneously engineering collaborative networks has allowed us to dramatically integrate e-business paradigms. The next goal is to implement collaborative markets while the competition can barely generate B2B models of evolved enterprise experiences. I am given to pause if they are even able to e-enable user-centric solutions?​