I have a site that I've neglected for the most part, aged maybe 3 years or so. It's in a niche that I'm actually passionate about and thinking about reviving it in the coming months.
I've looked over the analytic data for the past month and I've noticed almost every article has it's own picture that I've included rank pretty high in G, usually in the top 3 images for a medium/highly competitive keyword, but the article itself just gets 10-15 long tails a day, which are usually listed N/A. The image itself gets anywhere from 80 to 900 impressions a day, depending on the article that I built the keyword/keywords around, but of course almost zero clicks as well.
Not that the images are worth anything to click on themselves, I'm just curious on how I'm "accidentally" making this happen? My on-page on each article is pretty good, but my link profile isn't anything to brag about, since it's mostly been neglected and put on the back burner for my my other churn and burn sites the last few years.
Just looking for some insight from someone that actually tries to purposely rank images for whatever reason so I can understand what's actually happening here, since I can't identify a pattern across my articles that's making the images rank. Debated on putting this in T/C but felt this is something I should have already understood so I stuck it in the newbie section instead.
I've looked over the analytic data for the past month and I've noticed almost every article has it's own picture that I've included rank pretty high in G, usually in the top 3 images for a medium/highly competitive keyword, but the article itself just gets 10-15 long tails a day, which are usually listed N/A. The image itself gets anywhere from 80 to 900 impressions a day, depending on the article that I built the keyword/keywords around, but of course almost zero clicks as well.
Not that the images are worth anything to click on themselves, I'm just curious on how I'm "accidentally" making this happen? My on-page on each article is pretty good, but my link profile isn't anything to brag about, since it's mostly been neglected and put on the back burner for my my other churn and burn sites the last few years.
Just looking for some insight from someone that actually tries to purposely rank images for whatever reason so I can understand what's actually happening here, since I can't identify a pattern across my articles that's making the images rank. Debated on putting this in T/C but felt this is something I should have already understood so I stuck it in the newbie section instead.
