Placement Testing for an Adult Video Site Media Buy

zxvff

New member
Jan 9, 2011
131
3
0
Las Vegas, NV
A couple of months ago (February) I purchased some ad placements on a popular 'tube' style adult video site (site 1). I ran about a dozen ads all in the same placement and targeting . I found that 4 of the ads performed significantly better than the rest, so in March I just ran these 4 ads. For all ads in both February and March I was using the same ad placement - the one that gave me the most impressions for my money (it was Position B on the image below). This month, I took the winner from those 4 ads (which is Ad 3 in the data below from April test) and I decided I would try to figure out how much ad placement matters. I did run it on a different website with the same layout as site 1, but I imagined that since they are both porn sites and both have identical layouts, I could draw the same conclusions. Site 2 just happened to have more traffic (and the placements were more expensive). I ran the same ad in 2 different spots on site 2, and this is what I discovered:





If you look at the diagram above, this is the basic layout of the website. I purchased ad space in position A and position B.

As you can see, position A had a better CTR. Even though position B was quite a bit cheaper on a CPM basis by $0.15, position A actually provided for a cheaper CPC by $0.04.

Here are the exact numbers:

My most recent test: 2 days, $100 budget
Position A: 219 clicks, 72,376 impressions, 0.30% CTR, $0.23 CPC, $0.70 CPM with a total cost of $50.653
Position B: 176 clicks, 89,817 impressions, 0.20% CTR, $0.27 CPC, $0.549 CPM with a total cost of $49.290


April test: 3 days, $150 budget

Ad 1, position B: 408 clicks, 169,373 impressions, 0.24% CTR, $0.08 CPC, $0.202 CPM with a total cost of $34.214
Ad 2, position B: 334 Clicks, 170,286 impressions, 0.20% CTR, $0.10 CPC, $0.202 CPM with a total cost of $34.398
Ad 3, position B: 471 Clicks, 170,258 impressions, 0.28% CTR, $0.07 CPC, $0.202 CPM with a total cost of $34.392
Ad 4, position B: 366 Clicks, 170,170 impressions, 0.22% CTR, $0.09 CPC, $0.202 CPM with a total cost of $34.374


March test: I don't have this data right now.

How much money did I make?
I earned about $400 from the $150 I put in in April. I just finished running the $100 test yesterday, and so far I don't see a single conversion. Clearly I don't have a profitable campaign here, but I am surprised that I don't see any conversions yet.

I don't even know if anyone else will find this data interesting. I don't know if this is even enough data to draw any statistically significant conclusions. It's probably not, since I had such a difference in conversions from April to now. In retrospect, I think that perhaps I should have stuck with site1 which had the cheaper placement. All of these ad spots were purchased from TrafficJunky.com by the way, so that probably gives you a pretty good idea which sites I'm advertising on if you care. This isn't supposed to be some 'case study' or anything profound, just some observations I made. Feel free to share any conclusions you think can be drawn from the data.
 


I think those sites are just overrun with the same offers. Most people on those sites are returning visitors who just wanna rub one out quick and move on with their day...well that is what I have heard anyway...
 
How much money did I make?
I earned about $400 from the $150 I put in in April. I just finished running the $100 test yesterday, and so far I don't see a single conversion. Clearly I don't have a profitable campaign here, but I am surprised that I don't see any conversions yet.

Are you still advertising on the 1st site? Are you saying that both sites haven't had a single conversion this month, or are you just advertising on the new site now?

It could be a couple things. If you are having trouble with the previous site that was profitable then your ads have probably burned out.

As for the 2nd site, it doesn't matter how much it looks like the first site. Different sites and traffic sources all convert differently. Making assumptions is like shooting yourself in the foot and is something I've had to learn the hard way.

I have a campaign right now with 2 ad groups, both with an exact match keyword. The 2 keywords are the same the only difference is the one is plural. Ex. bed and beds

Both ad groups are split testing the exact same 2 ad copies. Surprisingly ad A converts better for the singular and ad B for the plural.

The only difference is an "s" in the keyword. The tiniest detail can have the biggest results. That's how you should be looking at everything.

I'm guessing you just took your winning ads from the first site and ported them over to the 2nd site and thought they'd be the obvious winners right? For all you know you'll switch over to site 1's losers and they'll be profitable on site 2.