Question for Pumping Web 2.0's

X

xha44a

New member
Jan 11, 2013
98
1
0
Hello there WF!

After a prolonged absence during which no one missed me I'm back with more questions. Here's what I'm after. I've created myself a nice little web 2.0 network. When I say little, I mean 100 web 2.0's. I've been dripping content onto them for a while. I'm sitting between 3-9 posts on each. After a couple months of dripping I decided to hit them with some links... lightly.

Not just wanting to build them up, I also decided to do a test. I picked up 4 different link packages off BHW (before I came here... don't hate me!) and ran a test with each of them. Basically to find out what worked best for link packages. Tracked the results over a 2 months and then shared the results.

Now that I'm here on WF - I want to ask a question, particularly from experienced members here.

Assuming I don't want to spend time on building some links to my Web 2.0's (I have enough on my hands trying to provide content), what would be some link packages you would recommend for my web 2.0's. WF seems to have higher end/better services so I was wondering. Keep in mind I have 100 of them - so packages that only let you link to 1 site might be out of my budget.

Thanks everyone in advance.

XH
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROIShareTeam


How about ensuring they all have some decent social links, like from fb, twitter, G+ etc? Not too many, you don't want to make it too obvious. Use these to compliment your other links.
 
Hi

Appreciate the suggestion I'll take it into consideration. But how about link packages/tools/tips to give them a relevancy boost and serp boost?
 
xha44a said:
Assuming I don't want to spend time on building some links to my Web 2.0's (I have enough on my hands trying to provide content), what would be some link packages you would recommend for my web 2.0's. WF seems to have higher end/better services so I was wondering. Keep in mind I have 100 of them - so packages that only let you link to 1 site might be out of my budget.
Click to expand...

Seems like you spent some time on this network, so you might not want to hit all of the sites in it with common links. The cheap and easy way is going to leave you with a hell of a footprint, unless you spend some time planning out what you want to do.
 
IceToEskimos said:
Seems like you spent some time on this network, so you might not want to hit all of the sites in it with common links. The cheap and easy way is going to leave you with a hell of a footprint, unless you spend some time planning out what you want to do.
Click to expand...

Hi IceToEskimos

I did spend a while on it. I have 100 decent blogs, content is viewed as legit enough by Google - I'm having my blogs taking up the majority of the top 10 spaces for my exact match keywords (admittedly low comp), which suggest to me Google is giving them some relevance for my keywords and doesn't think it's duplicate content. That's my take on it at least.

Your suggestion to not take the easy way out (to protect my network) is exactly what I'm thinking. The only problem is, I'm not sure exactly how I should go about doing this. I know the path I'm taking on my money site (Hobbster's guides, guest post tornado guide, etc) however I really see no feasibility of doing this with 100 Web 2.0's. Doing that for a money site is bloody hard enough - I can't go full out with that on my web 2.0's!!

Can you please provide me some direction with this? What would you do with this? I'm even open to the idea of higher cost link packages - or do you view all such packages are not the best? As one of the more senior members here I would LOVE to hear from you. PM or reply here... even a hand wave in the correct direction would be greaat :-)

Thanks!

xha44a

P.S. How do you get such epic quotes for your sig line?
 
Does anyone have any decent link packages they would recommend? I am probably asking to get spammed with this but third party recommendations from senior members here will go a long way!
 
Nobody willing to provide some general direction guidance for pumping a web 2.0 network? :-(
 
golan said:
Try Link Splash if you can afford.

:rasta:
Click to expand...

Hi Golan,

Seriously appreciated... I was getting a little discouraged. I will give the "link splash" package a try and see how it goes. I'll try that on one of my test groups to see how it works :-)



CCarter said:
The reason you aren't getting many answers is this is a pretty sensitive question...
Zw4PXNg.jpg
Click to expand...

Fair enough. I wasn't wanting your exact linking plan... even a PM with a service you'd recommend would be awesome :-) Hand waves in the general direction are also MUCHLY appreciated.


skohh said:
I use link tornados
Click to expand...

Any chance I could get a link from you? I Google link tornados and all it brings up is the link between climate change and extreme weather events... PM me if you would prefer to lmk that way.
 
skohh said:
I use link tornados
Click to expand...

xha44a said:
Any chance I could get a link from you? I Google link tornados and all it brings up is the link between climate change and extreme weather events... PM me if you would prefer to lmk that way.
Click to expand...

6ryRIuQ.gif


Come on guys, let's keep the trolling out of the newbie section. LOl, link tornado... LOL

Dzianis is a guy you need to take a look at. Golan linked him.​
 
CCarter said:
6ryRIuQ.gif


Come on guys, let's keep the trolling out of the newbie section. LOl, link tornado... LOL

Dzianis is a guy you need to take a look at. Golan linked him.​
Click to expand...


I was actually so excited to get a response I didn't even have my troll-o-meter running... Though knowing wf that's a serious vulnerability lol. I've emailed dzianis and appreciate the feedback :-)
 
Dead serious, just shoot some damn links at them. Tier links at them if you want to play it that much safer. You can't possibly get enough high quality links to all of your tier 1's, so don't even worry about it. Either spam them direct or build some contextuals to them, as in more web 2.0's or "other" types, and build spam as tier 3. Definitely use contextuals you can control or you'll end up wasting a lot of good juice as the ones you don't control go down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom