Rand Paul "Assures" Evangelicals That He Doesn't Want to End the Drug War

dreamache

New member
Jun 26, 2006
4,394
130
0
Rand Paul "Assures" Evangelicals That He Doesn't Want to End the Drug War - Hit & Run : Reason.com

At a lunch Friday with about a dozen evangelical pastors in a Cedar Rapids hotel, the younger Paul assured the group that he disagrees with libertarians who support legalizing drugs. When one pastor inquired about ideological ties between Paul and his father, the senator asked that he be judged as his own man.

Paul said he believes in freedom and wants a “virtuous society” where people practice “self-restraint.” Yet he believes in laws and limits as well. Instead of advocating for legalized drugs, for example, he pushes for reduced penalties for many drug offenses.

I’m not advocating everyone go out and run around with no clothes on and smoke pot,” [Rand] said. “I’m not a libertarian. I’m a libertarian Republican. I’m a constitutional conservative.

“He made it very clear that he does not support legalization of drugs like marijuana and that he supports traditional marriage,” [said Brad Sherman of the Solid Rock Christian Church in Coralville, Iowa].

..because everyone would totally go out and run around with no clothes on and smoke pot if it were made legal.

Rand Paul, lol!
 


Then God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
 
It sucks that they called it a drug war, but I agree that it shouldn't be stopped. You try to limit its impact and maybe things should be down differently but allowing the wholesale distribution and sale of illegal substances is wrong
 
It sucks that they called it a drug war, but I agree that it shouldn't be stopped. You try to limit its impact and maybe things should be down differently but allowing the wholesale distribution and sale of illegal substances is wrong

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix0bRqEBIAk]"I Got Fired From My Florida Pain Clinic and Need a New One" (877) 877-8556 - YouTube[/ame]
:stonedsmilie:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7S65-isBqcM"]Undercover At a Florida Pain Clinic: Vanguard Scenes - YouTube[/ame]

Big Pharma is the biggest drug dealer in the world, but that's ok right? Fuck the "War" on drugs.
 

Think of the junkie who breaks into your house to steal your stuff to pay for the next hit or the person who puts a gun to your head while your at the ATM to get money to feed their addiction, or the person who is under the influence and causes a car accident that kills somebody. If people got high at home and stayed there it would be one thing but they don't
 
He's trying to speak their language to get them on board. Rand is just about the last hope for the US.
Who says he's not trying to speak anyone's language he talks to to try and get them on board, the same way Obama does? Try to please everyone and you'll please no one.

Think of the junkie who breaks into your house to steal your stuff to pay for the next hit or the person who puts a gun to your head while your at the ATM to get money to feed their addiction, or the person who is under the influence and causes a car accident that kills somebody. If people got high at home and stayed there it would be one thing but they don't
I hate those damn weed junkies.
 
He's trying to speak their language to get them on board. Rand is just about the last hope for the US.
How the FUCK is that hope?

Everyone knows that power corrupts. Clearly you are seeing evidence that he's just a politician here, with no value in freedom... Very much unlike his father.

He's a disgrace. I'd spit on Rand in front of Ron's face.



Drugs use isn't just contained to a bubble, it's effects society who have no involvement in drugs and it starts to infringe on the liberties of others.
Do you understand that the government, in trying to control that infringement, FAR surpasses it in their infringement activities?


Think of the junkie who breaks into your house to steal your stuff to pay for the next hit or the person who puts a gun to your head while your at the ATM to get money to feed their addiction, or the person who is under the influence and causes a car accident that kills somebody. If people got high at home and stayed there it would be one thing but they don't
These are crimes in themselves that should be punished... Without a war on drugs, they were already being punished properly.

With a war on drugs, people who just want to smoke a leaf in their cabin in the woods are hunted down and thrown in amongst the largest prison population the world has ever known.
 
signora+nel+giusto.jpg
 
Think of the junkie who breaks into your house to steal your stuff to pay for the next hit or the person who puts a gun to your head while your at the ATM to get money to feed their addiction, or the person who is under the influence and causes a car accident that kills somebody. If people got high at home and stayed there it would be one thing but they don't

Except drugs are illegal and that shit happens anyway, so legalizing drugs wouldn't change that. Meanwhile, people that use drugs responsibly are tossed in prison on the taxpayer dime because they're a threat to...nobody but themselves. That makes sense to you?
 
It sucks that they called it a drug war, but I agree that it shouldn't be stopped. You try to limit its impact and maybe things should be down differently but allowing the wholesale distribution and sale of illegal substances is wrong

If there wasn't a "war" on drugs, people wouldn't have to hold people up at ATM's, or break in your house, etc.
We have the 3 biggest killers of humans encouraged here in the USA seen as legal and acceptable.
#4 = prescription drug companies that kill someone every 19 seconds.

PS - all this "war" on drugs stuff is for the prison business as LukeP has mentioned. They just sp1n it round, right round, like meat for all the clueless to keep their games going.
 
Think of the junkie who breaks into your house to steal your stuff to pay for the next hit or the person who puts a gun to your head while your at the ATM to get money to feed their addiction, or the person who is under the influence and causes a car accident that kills somebody. If people got high at home and stayed there it would be one thing but they don't

These are all crimes, and they happen regardless of drugs being legal or illegal.

The difference is, when you make drugs illegal, you invite even more crime because criminals take over the drug market.

By making drugs illegal, you also create a "gateway effect" because criminals control the soft drugs and the hard drugs. So instead of Jimmy going to a dispensary and buying weed like he would liquor, he goes to a drug dealer who also has cocaine, heroin, and meth.

You also invite criminals who don't care about quality and safety into the market. So the next time your daughter or your friends daughter takes Molly at a concert, she's ingesting a lot worse than just Molly.

The fact of the matter is that a majority of people do drugs, whether they drink alcohol, smoke weed, take molly, or smoke cigarettes. The majority of people doing drugs do it responsibly. But people like you choose to ignore that fact and point to minority of people who don't do drugs responsibly as the reason drugs should be illegal.

Why not ban cars? A minority of people don't drive responsibly.
Why not ban fast food and junk food? Some people can't eat responsibly.

No, no one brings that up because it's a bullshit argument. And it's just a bullshit to say drugs should be illegal because a few people can't control themselves and turn into junkies and alcoholics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IceToEskimos