SC Republican Debate

SUP3RNOVA

Goober Gay
Mar 5, 2007
2,300
72
0
I see we're off to the typical start.

NbCzC.jpg
 


I told myself I would not watch, but here I am, watching.. fuck.

edit: FUCK YOU NEWT.

edit: LOL, fuck you newt. oh man.. I haven't started drinking yet either.

edit: newt, y u mad tho?
 
Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com

CNN News Flashed my iPad that Newt is denying is affair claim. I don't care CNN.

Newt has the biggest snake oil salesman characteristics. You don't get that insane/inhuman confidence from being honest and non scripted. He reminds of this ponzi scheme religious guy. I bet he's feeling smug with his $5M donation from Las Vegas Sand's Adelson. I wonder if Adelson would just freely drop that cash without wanting something in return...

On average, this is an age war:

Under 30 -> Ron Paul supporters who don't want the inflation tax
Over 50 -> Generally, morons who want to offer entitlements and are too stupid or don't care about younger generations

Every generation, on average, gets smarter.

The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex, Santorum, appears surprisingly honest but he's still a nutjob

Mitt Romney is a war monger.

Obama bribes the poor to vote for him with entitlements/food stamps/appealing to black pride.

I still have not heard a rational choice beyond Ron Paul.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to have to call shenanigans on that one. The youth today are about the dumbest group of motherfuckers this planet has ever produced. Just cuz they got Ipads and shit doesn't make them smart.

I am glad you did. I am tired of arguing with the WF Youth.
 
I am glad you did. I am tired of arguing with the WF Youth.

http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2010/10/29/tests-say-americans-becoming-more-intelligent-over-the-generations-how-could-that-be

U MAD? There are exceptions like Ron Paul. I gave you a general answer.

Researchers have compared scores on so-called “intelligence” tests, particularly tests that measure how well test-takers answer abstract problems, of Americans today to the scores of Americans of who took similar tests decades ago. In general, contemporary Americans – and westerners in general – score higher than did people in the early- and mid-twentieth century. (For why I say “so-called ‘intelligence tests’,” see Chs. 2 & 3 of this.) Indeed, there have been “massive gains” in scores over the twentieth century. This increase has been called the “Flynn Effect” after the scholar who first noted it. The upward surge appears to have leveled off more recently, but the long-term change is dramatic. (For a sample of readings, see James Flynn’s book here, and these sources: here and here.) The score of the average American test-taker in 2000 would have qualified him or her as a “genius” a few generations earlier.


Just look at the numbers.

Obviously, correlation doesn't mean causation but I stand by my theory that the younger population gets it.

Old guys, generally, don't get why Ron Paul is the best choice.

Most humans are herd-like in behavior. Older people are generally more stubborn but I need science to support this.

Numbers don't lie.
 
Any faith I had in RP to win gets diminished with every debate I watch. He isn't given time because he never talks about specific issues that people in that state want to hear about. Any time he's asked a specific question, his response is :

"Well we can fix that by transforming our governments philosophy and quit being the policemen of the world!!!"

He sounds like a broken record at this point.
 
Any faith I had in RP to win gets diminished with every debate I watch. He isn't given time because he never talks about specific issues that people in that state want to hear about. Any time he's asked a specific question, his response is :

"Well we can fix that by transforming our governments philosophy and quit being the policemen of the world!!!"

He sounds like a broken record at this point.

You're right, but he's also right too.. the problem is, your average dumb fuck American doesn't understand much of what he says because it's not dumbed down and user-friendly.

for example, he'll say things like "liquidating debt" and "sound money", I'd bet 80% of people watching don't know what either of those phrases mean.
 
"Well we can fix that by transforming our governments philosophy and quit being the policemen of the world!!!"

He sounds like a broken record at this point.

Maybe it'll actually sink in if he says it enough. Reform the monetary system, improve foreign relations through diplomacy and nonintervention, invest in your own people and infrastructure.