I just threw together a campaign running some short tails and doing some testing, and I am running multiple ad copy for the words. However, I'm not sure which would be better to do. I know that you should always run A/B tests for everything, but does that mean A/B/C/D for ad copy would get you quicker results, or just dilute the data that you are trying to gather?
I also read that the first copy should be polar opposites and then work on it from there depending on how your market responds. Here's what I mean:
A/B test:
You Can Lose Weight Now
Guaranteed Million Pound Loss!
FatLoss.com
You Will Never Lose Weight
You Will Always Be Fat...
FatLoss.com
A/B/C/D test:
You Can Lose Weight Now
Guaranteed Million Pound Loss!
FatLoss.com
You Will Lose Weight Now
Guaranteed Hundred Pound Loss!
FatLoss.com
You Will Never Lose Weight
You Will Always Be Fat...
FatLoss.com
You Will Probably Stay Fat
It Will Eventually Kill You!
FatLoss.com
I'm sure you got the point w/o the examples but would doing an A/B/C/D test be more or less beneficial (than a simple A/B test) when first gathering data?
I also read that the first copy should be polar opposites and then work on it from there depending on how your market responds. Here's what I mean:
A/B test:
You Can Lose Weight Now
Guaranteed Million Pound Loss!
FatLoss.com
You Will Never Lose Weight
You Will Always Be Fat...
FatLoss.com
A/B/C/D test:
You Can Lose Weight Now
Guaranteed Million Pound Loss!
FatLoss.com
You Will Lose Weight Now
Guaranteed Hundred Pound Loss!
FatLoss.com
You Will Never Lose Weight
You Will Always Be Fat...
FatLoss.com
You Will Probably Stay Fat
It Will Eventually Kill You!
FatLoss.com
I'm sure you got the point w/o the examples but would doing an A/B/C/D test be more or less beneficial (than a simple A/B test) when first gathering data?