Funny how people get blasted and even banned for outing and that's all WRW does.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Yeah, but that 95% of the people do < 1% of the damage.At least it's behind a somewhat expensive service to keep out 95% of the people that could just read a thread on here.
ooooohhh how much how much
Funny how people get blasted and even banned for outing and that's all WRW does.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I believe that about two years Jon used to charge $5,000 a week.
If you think this is the same then you need your IQ tested.
There's a huge barrier to entry in media buying. It's called cash.
Yeah, but that 95% of the people do < 1% of the damage.
Being one of the 95%, I know this to be true.
If you think this is the same then you need your IQ tested.
There's a huge barrier to entry in media buying. It's called cash.
so it's OK to do it if you're serving the rich, but not OK to do it, if you're serving the poor? Seems like a faulty logic to me.
for the record: I have absolutely nothing about this banner and more importantly it's nobody's problem but the owner's if there should or shouldn't be banners on the site.
WRW provides a service(a good one) and renting space, to a quality product where a large interested audience can see it is what advertising should be about.
Doesn't matter if you're relying on a shady SEO tactic, or finding "pockets of traffic" to sell worthless shit on 200% margin. Your business model is doomed to fail if it is about about exploiting to death an advertising technique, rather than using it as a mere promotional method.
WAT???