What Is Behind The Spread Of Feminism?

Fiver

Fiver

New member
Jan 30, 2009
2,011
12
0
"There's something happening here
But what it is ain't exactly clear"

-Buffalo Springfield



It's obvious that some organizations or people are behind this mass spread of feminism. I see it everywhere: in magazines, on TV, and of course the Internet. You just can't get away from it.

Why is this happening now? Why is there all this hate and anger coming from these women who act like they're chained to a stove all day by men?

This is 2014. Women work. Women vote. Women can do whatever they want. And yet all I constantly hear are these ridiculous phrases like, "empowering women". Empower women to do what? You're not in chains. You're not a women living in the Middle East wrapped up in a sheet so no one can see you.

The effects of this "movement" has resulted in women acting more like men than like women.

I could talk about the effects of this programming going on but I don't want to get away from main topic, which is why this is happening. Somebody is behind this and they have a reason for pushing this agenda.

What is this agenda?

PHP:
 


i only see the crazy feminists on the internet where every idiot has a voice. it's just chicks making use of their women studies education. we're the bigger fools for reading this crap and getting riled up by it.

i regularly waste an hour reading TumblrInAction: Actually Not That Bad with my jaw dropped. it's good entertainment. but it's a waste of time.
 
I (like to) think it's akin to the Marxist notion of false (class) conciousness. Culturally and biologically women will likely never be "equal" but if they think they will be or are, then cool.

There's definitely something in the human complex which makes us take secret warmth or desire to be persecuted/oppressed. Obviously these are extreme terms, but if you replace them with the need to feel special then it doesn't sound that crazy, does it?

What's one of the easiest ways to be feel special? Align yourself with a minority group or movement which achieves a state of relative individualism compared to peers.

It'll pass, it's probably an offset of the "geek" thing and girls who like "reading".

# Fashion and Trends 101.

My academic mind is so blunt these days, I really need to stop spending my entire work day manually emailing webmasters asking them to remove no-follow links#bigbrandseo.
 
This.

PepperJack said:
Click to expand...

And this:

US-CentralIntelligenceAgency-Seal.svg
 
Even if the J crowd didn't invent Feminism for divide & conquer/federal reserve money skimming purposes (after all you're expanding the economy by putting women into workplaces) the CIA would have for distraction purposes and black money funds (skimming through the military-industrial complex and other sundry gov't organizations; more women working means more money for wars). Black money to develop exotic technology on the down low as the CIA was formed three months after the Roswell Crash in 1947.



Fiver, I thought that you would have known this already...?


P.s. I say the Jews invented Feminism before the CIA because the Frankfurt School suggested a Feminist Society back in the early '20s.

http://libertarianalliance.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/the-frankfurt-school-conspiracy-to-corrupt/

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’
 
Gloria Steinem, probably the most well known feminist in the world, was funded by the CIA. She received a "special scholarship", which fully funded her education at Smith College, a scholarship which had never been awarded before or since, with an unknown source of funds. She then continued to receive funding through special organizations that were used for all sorts of fun feminist projects, all of which had funding that either came from unknown sources or eventually led back to CIA projects.

And I don't mean any of this in a tin hat conspiracy sort of way either. She has since admitted it, although she denies they have continued to fund her.

So the real question to ask is, why did/does the CIA play such an active role in funding Feminism? I don't claim to be an expert on the CIA, but everything they fund seems to revolve around disrupting societal norms and destabilizing governments in order to gain control over a population.

Aaron Russo had a theory:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpjmvaIgNA"]Feminism Was Created To Destabilize Society, Tax Women and set up the NWO - Aaron Russo - YouTube[/ame]

I dunno.
 
Unarmed Gunman said:
Gloria Steinem, probably the most well known feminist in the world, was funded by the CIA. She received a "special scholarship", which fully funded her education at Smith College, a scholarship which had never been awarded before or since, with an unknown source of funds. She then continued to receive funding through special organizations that were used for all sorts of fun feminist projects, all of which had funding that either came from unknown sources or eventually led back to CIA projects.

And I don't mean any of this in a tin hat conspiracy sort of way either. She has since admitted it, although she denies they have continued to fund her.

So the real question to ask is, why did/does the CIA play such an active role in funding Feminism? I don't claim to be an expert on the CIA, but everything they fund seems to revolve around disrupting societal norms and destabilizing governments in order to gain control over a population.

Aaron Russo had a theory:

Feminism Was Created To Destabilize Society, Tax Women and set up the NWO - Aaron Russo - YouTube

I dunno.
Click to expand...

Steinem was Jewish and the Rockefellers are rumored to be of Sephardic Jewish descent.

- henrymakow.com

The CIA was after control *and* money, just like the Zionists.
 
bodiddley said:
Fiver, I thought that you would have known this already...?
Click to expand...

Well, I actually do think there's some validity in the "divide and conquer" tactic but I decided to play devil's advocate here taking no opinion at all to see what other theories people have.

PHP:
 
Fiver said:
Well, I actually do think there's some validity in the "divide and conquer" tactic but I decided to play devil's advocate here taking no opinion at all to see what other theories people have.
Click to expand...

Which is actually one of the 48 laws of power - taking an initial position in an argument but not disclosing it :)

But you don't think that increasing the FED's interest income/CIA skimming money through a women-driven expanded economy is motivation as well?
 
"What Is Behind The Spread Of Feminism?"

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say "Women" Final answer.

Feminism used to be a great and necessary thing in the US and it still can be seen it's original, positive form in other nations around the world.

See it used to be about protecting women from violence and securing for them some basic human rights like free will and the right to live in peace. Feminist causes are kind of like lawsuits, some lawsuits are a good thing and bring about necessary change (big industry poisoning the ground water) others are just stupid and make us all look bad (lady that sued the weatherman in Israel for unexpected rain.)

Is it good that women not get acid thrown in their faces? Yes.
Is it good that little girls don't get mutilated with rusty knives? Definitely.
Is it awesome that I can read and write this post right now? For sure, thanks feminism!

But in the west now they are running out of real problems to solve, what they need to do of course is call it quits and be happy with the gains made but the problem is that they needed to call it quits awhile ago. It got really ridiculous in the 80s and 90s. I'd say that was where the feminist movement started to feel the diminishing returns but kept pushing forward.

Suddenly, it wasn't enough to be equal, women were inherently superior. Where the fuck did that come from? Then came the media-backed man bashing, the mass emasculation attempts. Why? Women weren't happy and they figured since feminism had made them happy in the past MORE feminism was going to make them happier. So they dug a hole, ruined male and female relations for a generation and upset the natural balance.

Men resented it, they rejected the women, women bashed them harder for not wanting them, and stupider and stupider.

I think similar things have happened in other movements. The racial equality movement in the US is similar. It seems once a movement has gained enough momentum it won't stop even when it has served it's purpose and achieved it's original goals, rather it keeps barreling forward in a full pendulum swing until it inevitably crashes and burns.

TLDR; women are nuts, sorry bro.

And yeah the men upstairs are smiling and nodding at these broads because women are on the whole less power hungry as far as wanting to run the show. Less competition, less opposition, more money for the "Pro feminism" boys at the top of the food chain. #shame
 
By the way, all jokes aside, how are you guys defining feminism?

The traditional definition isn't as outrageous as a lot of folks think. In fact, it's consistent with civil rights legislation (i.e. equality). But like the term racism, a lot of junk gets thrown into the pot that doesn't belong there.

Don't get me wrong... it's definitely entertaining. I just want to see whether everyone here is on the same page.
 
I'm seeing it a lot from "thick" libertarians. (Thick as in adding in all sorts of other shit from the left) vs. thin, as in simply NAP + property rights.

Another one that gets me is "CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE" shit going around.
 
BabyGotBacklink said:
"What Is Behind The Spread Of Feminism?"

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say "Women" Final answer.

Feminism used to be a great and necessary thing in the US and it still can be seen it's original, positive form in other nations around the world.

See it used to be about protecting women from violence and securing for them some basic human rights like free will and the right to live in peace. Feminist causes are kind of like lawsuits, some lawsuits are a good thing and bring about necessary change (big industry poisoning the ground water) others are just stupid and make us all look bad (lady that sued the weatherman in Israel for unexpected rain.)

Is it good that women not get acid thrown in their faces? Yes.
Is it good that little girls don't get mutilated with rusty knives? Definitely.
Is it awesome that I can read and write this post right now? For sure, thanks feminism!

But in the west now they are running out of real problems to solve, what they need to do of course is call it quits and be happy with the gains made but the problem is that they needed to call it quits awhile ago. It got really ridiculous in the 80s and 90s. I'd say that was where the feminist movement started to feel the diminishing returns but kept pushing forward.

Suddenly, it wasn't enough to be equal, women were inherently superior. Where the fuck did that come from? Then came the media-backed man bashing, the mass emasculation attempts. Why? Women weren't happy and they figured since feminism had made them happy in the past MORE feminism was going to make them happier. So they dug a hole, ruined male and female relations for a generation and upset the natural balance.

Men resented it, they rejected the women, women bashed them harder for not wanting them, and stupider and stupider.

I think similar things have happened in other movements. The racial equality movement in the US is similar. It seems once a movement has gained enough momentum it won't stop even when it has served it's purpose and achieved it's original goals, rather it keeps barreling forward in a full pendulum swing until it inevitably crashes and burns.

TLDR; women are nuts, sorry bro.

And yeah the men upstairs are smiling and nodding at these broads because women are on the whole less power hungry as far as wanting to run the show. Less competition, less opposition, more money for the "Pro feminism" boys at the top of the food chain. #shame
Click to expand...

All this shit falls under the mantra of "never let a good tragedy go to waste". You take a societal problem, however small, and you push it back completely in the other direction and hold it there.

All this shit was laid out years ago - nearly 100 years ago.

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’


THE PEOPLE WHO CAME UP WITH THESE IDEAS ARE THE SAME ONES IN CHARGE OF THE MEDIA TODAY.


I hate to be cliched, but wake the fuck up people!

p.s. - women were always nuts but in the old days they used to realize it. Most women pre-suffrage wanted nothing to do with the vote due to this awareness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom