WickedFire now Officially NSFW?

profitmotive

profitmotive

Grown Ass Man
Jan 8, 2012
369
5
0
I'm sure this won't be a popular position among our teenage (and teen minded adults) who clearly never get to see nudity outside of the internet...

But I was just wondering, are the forum rules (11 &12) no longer relevant? Because we now have accounts like SuddenlyTits and SuddenlyAss that post noodies outside of good ole STS kinda making the whole site NSFW or, more importantly to me, not safe for viewing in a family friendly environment (I got kidz mang!).

When I'm reading a case study or other IM related thread I'm not looking for tits. Sorry for disappoint... I thought that's what Shooting The Shit was for?

So yeah, if it's changed just let us know. If not, what other rules can we break just cause we feel like it? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bitsdawg, hakkairu and danke


Disable images.

aIZbv.gif


Problem?
 
ShadowCaster said:
Disable images.

aIZbv.gif


Problem?
Click to expand...
Ha, fair game since we ARE in STS.

Disable images, sure! Except there is a rule that says I don't have to. Especially since people post images in case studies and other threads that are relevant to my interests.

So either we follow it or we don't. Simple question. Yes or no. Problem?
 
profitmotive said:
Ha, fair game since we ARE in STS.

Disable images, sure! Except there is a rule that says I don't have to. Especially since people post images in case studies and other threads that are relevant to my interests.

So either we follow it or we don't. Simple question. Yes or no. Problem?
Click to expand...

Why don't you just block suddenly_tits and suddenly_ass like others have suggested in the other threads on this topic? As far as I know, they are the only ones posting nudity outside of STS.
 
That's not the point. Of course I can do that. However, the point is the question in the title of this thread. Which every responder so far has been kind of avoiding.
 
profitmotive said:
That's not the point. The point is the question in the title of this thread.

Standing by for someone qualified to answer.
Click to expand...

Actually it is the point. You're whining like a little bitch about some boobies because you said you can't browse the site with your kids around. Blocking the only 2 members that post outside of STS is a solution that will let you browse the site without having to worry about titties and vaginas popping up when you're reading about LukeP's million dollar marketing plan.

Why's that so fucking hard?
 
While it doesn't really apply to me, I can understand the OP's point. If there's a rule that says NSFW stuff needs to stay in STS, but SuddenlyTits & SuddenlyAss is allowed to deviate from the rules, what's to stop everyone else from doing it too. Next thing you know you have to block dozens of people.

We all like to see us some tiddays, but I know a lot of guys use this forum in a work environment that might not be so accepting of nudity.

If it's going to be a forum rule, enforce it and keep the boobs in the STS section. If not, take it off the rule page so everyone knows what to expect. Just keep it consistent is all.
 
music4mic said:
Actually it is the point. You're whining like a little bitch about some boobies because you said you can't browse the site with your kids around. Blocking the only 2 members that post outside of STS is a solution that will let you browse the site without having to worry about titties and vaginas popping up when you're reading about LukeP's million dollar marketing plan.

Why's that so fucking hard?
Click to expand...

... because just as suddenly as one is blocked, another suddenly_anything accounts can be created for more sudden_nuts in your face

tits and ass don't bug me, but giving this dood shit when he has a point might not be too productive.

@proft, I've never considered WF safe for a normal workplace .. perhaps it's time you do the same.
 
erect said:
... because just as suddenly as one is blocked, another suddenly_anything accounts can be created for more sudden_nuts in your face

tits and ass don't bug me, but giving this dood shit when he has a point might not be too productive.

@proft, I've never considered WF safe for a normal workplace .. perhaps it's time you do the same.
Click to expand...

Maybe tackle that problem when it becomes a problem? Didn't Suddenly_Cock last about 2 hours before he was banned?

Edit: Also the novelty of Suddenly_Tits & Ass is going to wear off soon and the poster will probably stop. He's already slowed down considerably- the problem will probably take care of itself.
 
Last edited:
WF just reflects the zeitgeist. Used to be HBO Family was just Pixar movies and Homes Alones, now you can't escape Jeanne Tripplehorn's ass and Kate Winslet's boobs.
 
ly2 from WF said:
The solution is clear, get rid of your kids. Send them to foster homes so you can once again browse WF like a boss.
Click to expand...

This.

I was tired of visiting websites with adult content only at times when my son was away.

I sold him on Craigslist for three fiddy, some menthol cigs, a bottle of grape soda, a slice of waddymelon, and a bucket of KFC (extra crispy).

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
 
Also, some of us are females. We are more turned on by pictures of :

big







fat










wallets.


Lol.. I am learning to troll like a Jcash.
 
not trying to be a fag, but i think OP is right. i don't care about NSFW because i work at home and i don't hold my kids in my lap while i discuss where to best place my spam comments. but even though a lot of us think suddenly_porn is funny and fun, it could get someone fired. and that shit is super serial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom