I love how sensationalized stories like this are interpreted. Funny how they add a byline at the end of "Oh yeah she also was charged with Breaking and Entering and possession of controlled substances." They never mention that numbers are the statutory maximum on a sentence. In other words, she could get 2-30 years for the B&E, 1-10 for the addies and 1-10 for animal cruelty all run concurrent which turns that 50 year headline into a 2-50 in which she probably goes to boot camp for 3 months and gets out on parole.
Think of newspaper headline writers as marketers, and they're selling us on the benefits of Acai right now in order to get links to that gay ass article. They are staying as far away from the actual truth without actually outright lying in order to get eyeballs to the site.