posted by clyde:
Incorrect. There are tons of review sites in the WIPO archives, mostly because they are monetised on the markholder's traffic. You just haven't hit any companies who are hard about their marks -- some will let certain kinds of sites go, or certain traffic levels or whatever. PayPalSucks.com falls under fair use for commentary and criticism.
Frank
Most of my MFA sites have trademarked names in them but since these are review sites I'm protected just like paypalsucks.com
Incorrect. There are tons of review sites in the WIPO archives, mostly because they are monetised on the markholder's traffic. You just haven't hit any companies who are hard about their marks -- some will let certain kinds of sites go, or certain traffic levels or whatever. PayPalSucks.com falls under fair use for commentary and criticism.
Frank