Cure for Cancer developed at my Alma Mater | 70-100% success rate
- Thread starter Unarmed Gunman
- Start date
I reckon that's a load of shit. They're still going to make money from this cure if it ever actually makes it to real world use. What's the difference between this and chemotherapy apart from the patient not dying?
It was published in Nature.
The billions of dollars that would be lost in the pharmaceutical industry as a result of no more need for "quality of life" type medications that cancer patients take while they're waiting to die.
Personalised Chemo drugs are far more profitable than palliative care drugs.
Most drugs used in palliative medicine are things like antiinflammatories, antinausea and analgesics, and often generics (no patents).
Pharma make all their money from patented blockbuster drugs. Stuff like monoclonal antibodies (used in Chemo) cost $30k per 8 week course, versus a few hundred bucks for palliative drugs.
This stuff has the potential to be even more expensive.
Most drugs used in palliative medicine are things like antiinflammatories, antinausea and analgesics, and often generics (no patents).
Pharma make all their money from patented blockbuster drugs. Stuff like monoclonal antibodies (used in Chemo) cost $30k per 8 week course, versus a few hundred bucks for palliative drugs.
This stuff has the potential to be even more expensive.
Just like my music tutor's childhood friend's family (my music tutor is about 70+ now and he told me this story about 7 years ago). The father invented a carburetor in his barn that would give his farm truck 50+ miles to the gallon without losing any power.
One afternoon, he and his friend were riding their bikes to the barn his friend's father was working in and when they got there a few black cars were sitting outside it. He watched as his friend's family and the barn was taken away and he never saw him again.
Whether the story was true or not, I don't know, but he never lied to me so I have no reason to doubt him - especially when this kind of stuff has happened in the past in other industries and the fact that the oil companies have been paying large sums of money to buy people off for their own interests.
My point being - it's not in the large corporation's interests to sell you a cure once when they can make more money selling you a treatment for the rest of your life.
The government will release, through various sources, that this is a scam, fake, bullshit, or whatever. To many pockets are being filled with the drugs in place to "fight" cancer.
Quote from the article:
Fuck. It irritates me how billions are DONATED to fund this type of research and then once a discovery is made the first thing they think is how are they going to pitch pharmaceuticals.
Fuck. It irritates me how billions are DONATED to fund this type of research and then once a discovery is made the first thing they think is how are they going to pitch pharmaceuticals.
Cool thread... Still think that people need to realise it is diet related.... if it wasn't the eastern civilizations would have been rife with it alot longer than 40-50 years ago.
As I said, cancer drugs today aren't rest-of-life treatments. They could charge $100,000 for this new drug and they'll make even more money than now. The best part is if they cure someones cancer and they go on to live another 10 years, there's a chance they'll get cancer again and require another $100,000 treatment. Much more profitable than the patient just dying after a mildly effective chemotherapy treatment.
Do you really think all these scientists working on cancer treatments have no hearts? They have family and friends dying of cancer too. I'm sick of hearing this bullshit. Any person or company that develops a cure for cancer and patents it is going to be absolutely swimming in money, not to mention be one of the most famous figures in the history of the world.
You are so naive it makes me LOL for realz.
Did you ever not think that there are COMPETING pharma companies?
Let's say your a multi-trillion-dollar Corp CEO, like Merck, P&G, or GSK. Your biz model is to sell drugs to millions of patents for $30k or more each, like you say.
Then you hear that some Uni kids made a CURE FOR CANCER, which would benefit a company ONE TIME to sell it for their going rate of $30k. -That's a price cut for sure, because then the patient won't have cancer anymore and they stop buying more treatments.
However, your competitors are swooping in to get their mitts on this Cure first... What do you do about it?
ONLY THE ONE PHARMA CORP THAT OWNS THIS WILL SURVIVE.
-It's far, far, far, far, far, far, far cheaper to kill these uni kids and bury the story. We're talking many trillions of dollars at stake here!
This guy tells a similar story and has not had the best experience with the utilities industry. He's posted massive amounts of his research and experiences:
My Adventures