Obama Administration Targeting White Males With Propaganda Video
- Thread starter Yuckystuff
- Start date
Sorry, most of us don't have a copy of the non-libtard dictionary. Feel free to educate us on the definitions of "prejudice" and "racism" that are used by you and your comrades.
Everyone is technically prejudice, whether or not they are a complete suicidal reality-denying willfully stupid moron.
The KKK had 6 million members at one point and that is now in the thousands. Despite a constant shrinking in the amount of KKK members to be "held down" by, violent crime rates among blacks have consistently dropped to the point of being 1/3 of what they were years ago.
So therefore I concur that you do not have boobs.
I don't get it, Tommy Chong is part Chinese. Fun fact: Tommy Chong was in a motown style soul band once, in which he was the only non-black member. The band was called "Bobby Taylor and the Vancouvers" - but was previously known as "Four Niggers and a Chink" - no joke.
Bobby Taylor & the Vancouvers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
lol if anything being a girl makes seeing the inherent differences is race groups easier. i'd be comfortable walking through pretty much any white neighborhood in the u.s., pretty much any east/south asian neighborhood, and even many mexican/hispanic ones, but detroit or baltimore or montgomery??? fuck no
If crime rates among blacks used to be two thirds higher than they are now, what, did there use to be 100% black criminality? in all seriousness, though, who cares? they are the rates are still wildly higher than for any other group
i didn't say that the klan was effective, necessarily, only that there was (is) an understandable motivation for it. but the incidence of black on white interracial crime must have been significantly lower before segregation and when the klan was a relevant social force.
according to the federal bureau of justice statisic's National Crime Victimization Survey 2008, of the 520,000 violent interracial crimes involving black and whites, a white person was the victim 83% of the time. In the same year, black gangs committed 142,000 violent crimes against white victims. No white gang crime was reported against blacks. Are there even white gangs in the U.S.? In the same year, blacks raped or sexually assaulted 19000 whites. The same survey found ZERO cases of white on black sexual assault/rape. even I find that hard to believe. i could go on and on with these statistics....
sure, certainly. i don't know if you are suggesting that this is bad or not, though. predjudices (as well as the formation of stereotypes, for that matter) are a natural survival function of human psychology. it's basically just learning from experience and drawing conclusions about things we don't yet know about in order to have a better chance of surviving
Logic would dictate that you do, as you brought the topic up.
Their main motivation for forming was that they were upset with slavery being made illegal.
I don't believe race on race statistics were kept then, but violent crime rates overall have gone way down since those times. Most violent crime does not take place in schools, diners or the other places that were affected by segregation.
Yes, and I could go on and on with statistics of male on female crime. However I would only do that if it backed up a point I was trying to make. None of what you have posted dismisses the fact that the majority of crime is still committed by whites.
technically, you have a point here. yes, whites certainly do still commit plenty of crimes. however, white criminality is typically more private and less all-encompassing than it is with blacks. gangs, which are ubiquitous in black and other minority areas, are not seen in even the poorest white communities in the u.s. i've lived in some pretty poor white towns and, while it wasn't super pleasant, i rarely felt in physical danger. just riding BART (local train system) through Oakland on the other hand....
all this doesn't make things any less bad for the victims of white crime (which are almost completely other whites, unlike with blacks) but it does mean that the typical white criminal behaviour doesn't make it impossible for society to function in that area. its not the sort of crime that makes a city or region unable to support business, tourism, raising a family, and overall modern civilization. the constant gang wars, public drug dealing, and general air of random lawlessness that permeates the average black community, on the other hand, clearly does
i think the spirit of what i was saying was fairly evident, you just took it in a different direction since your worldview rejected the obvious reality of what i was hinting at. i.e. that when there is a substantial number of blacks in a given community it becomes a dirty, dangerous, unproductive wasteland that no one would want to live in (save for crazy liberal white kids who think its cool) including black people.
if you include every conceivable sort of violent crime, yes, perhaps whites do commit half of them. when it comes to the sort of violence that destroys a given city or neighborhood, though, it's a whole 'nother story.
having a few guys in your neighborhood who hit their wives is a bad thing for the individuals involved but it doesn't effect the quality of life for the community as a whole. roving gangs of kids breaking into cars and mugging people for their iphones, though, does.
So you're saying you'd feel equally comfortable taking a vacation in Manila as you would in the DRC, the black parts of South Africa, or the bad parts of Washignton DC, for that matter? I sincerely doubt it.
Yes, there is crime, including violent and serious crime, in most places in the world. however the volume and the pervasiveness at which it occurs is often overwhelmingly higher in areas with lots of blacks.
for example, all that stuff you posted about the Philippines is, i agree, a major problem. at the same time though, it doesn't prevent the average citizen or visitor from living in reasonable comfort and security, it doesn't prevent businesses from operating, etc. it's largely a private thing that goes mostly unseen. this doesn't make it "better," my point is, though, that it doesn't destroy the society the way blacks do nearly everywhere they occur in sizable numbers.
What you are doing here is focusing on the minor exceptions (and they do exist, as with nearly anything involving humans and human behavior) while blinding yourself to the painfully obvious big picture. that being that the levels of criminality and, ultimately, the capacity to create and/or sustain a functioning civilization varies markedly and consistently between the different races.
wow, this encapsulates the pathology of liberal thought better than anything I can ever recall coming across. so, every single person in new orleans would have to exhibit a given behaviour before you would feel comfortable drawing a conclusion about its residents? to apply the same logic to affiliate marketing, you'd have to get a 100% click through rate on an ad before you could say whether it was a winner or not. it is a sure sign that life is way to easy when people can make themselves this dumb and still survive.
why? was anyone disputing or even talking about that? of course males commit more crimes. the only thing I pointed out critically was your nonsensical talk about a single gender society. if you just want to speculate on sci-fi theoretical concepts fine, but i don't see how that is even close in tone or content to anything being discussed here
huh? i thought this was adequately covered when i mentioned the difference between total number of crimes committed and crime rate relative to population. Whites only commit that many crimes because there are way more white people in the country than any other race.
in the u.s., whites have the second lowest crime rate (asians have the lowest.) the white crime rate is probably lower than it is reported at, however, because many hispanics are categorized as white in the U.S.
link
and you know this how? i wouldn't say it's an untrue statement, but it simplifies a complex situation to the extent of being almost meaningless. if one had to sum it up briefly, i would say it was formed in order to maintain their society and way of life now that slavery had ended and the war lost and was in opposition both to black influence in society and to the intrusion of northerners
i find that kind of surprising. source? there is no way in hell black on white crime occurred at a fraction of the level it does now. back then whites looked after one another
the whole society was affected by desegregation. the federal government came and forced white people to open their schools, universities, and private businesses to a very different and often hostile population, that was not prepared to meaningfully or successfully take part in them. it ended what naturally occurs whenever two quite different groups of people life in close proximity (interacting with one another but maintaining seperate social organizations.)
gotta go cook dinner (yea! bbq chicken), so bein lazy but look at this
Wait, what?
You are too lazy to look at a statistic from the department of justice and share a right wing fucking FLYER instead?
::emp::
i didn't feel like going through the statistics and copying them over in my own words. am i obligated to? if you're interested do it yourself. the stats on the link are legit (if you don't think so and care about it, check them.) what difference does it make that it's a flyer? and the fact that it's supposedly "fucking right wing" somehow affects the accuracy of the data it quotes? :\
nobody's suggesting that. i think the point being made with the video is that it is just another example of the popular liberal worldview (constantly promoted by academia, left-leaning politicians, and activist groups) that white people are by default bad and all non whites are good (whatever bad behavior or failings they exhibit is obviously somehow the fault of the evil whites, of course.)