ALL in ONE Service : High Diversity from social signals to contextual edu links

Status
Not open for further replies.
Le-Project

Le-Project

New member
Jan 12, 2011
1,005
2
0
BacklinksProject.com
backlinksproject.com
Rating - 100%
330   0   0
header.png





faq.png


P.S : Almost all of the works are manual.

P.S.S : You can use as many anchors as you want, we'll spin it well.

P.S.S.S : Grab the review copies now!​
 


Free copy Review

REVIEW

Speed: 5/5, Excellent, received report within 24 hours.

Communication: 5/5, Le-Project replies to emails fast and don’t ask stupid questions:)

Price: 5/5, I got review copy but for such capacious work, this is a very appropriate price.

Quality: 4/5, Received excel report, which contains the following sheets / links:

- Profile EDU Backlink: 15 links, PR3-PR7. Links found 14 out of 15. Most EDU sites are from China and Taiwan.

- Web 2.0 Backlink: 16 links, Popular web 2,0 blogs, Links found 16 out of 16. All links and keywords placed correctly.

- SB to Web 2.0: 77 links. The most of the bookmarks show up 404 Error and only 18 links found out of 77 links. There is definitely space for quality improvements!!!

- Angela Backlink: 75 links: Links found 74 out of 75. Excellent, but also there is space for improvements. Profiles not look cleans, as there is no user photo, bio section is empty and also other details is empty. I think after some time these profiles will be deleted.

- RSS: 53 feeds I don’t know for what you are making Rss feed if this feeds is just with text and without any clickable link even in title. Waste of time. This was done with some automatic tool, and link is not placed correctly.

Overall Review: 4/5 there is definitely space to boost up quality for profile backlinks and rss feed, if you can it done, then this will be a quality backlinks package with ling diversity from good sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cg101
HAlf Off REVIEW

Speed: 5/5: Received report within a day.

Communication: 5/5 Simple and easy.

Price: 5/5 I really think it depends on what they're used for. For me I feel I'll certainly net profit off the campaign so it's a win.

Quality: 4.5/5 Words like "authority" backlinks could be misconstrued. These obviously aren't NYTimes links. I knew what I was getting. They have value, particularly with non-Google search engines. ;-)

Overall Review: 4.7/5
 
REVIEW

Speed: 5/5

I received a free review copy. The request was made on 7/21 and I received my report on 7/23. The speed was very good, however the review copy doesn’t mirror any exact package on the sales thread so I can’t tell you that if you ordered a trial, mini or full package that this is the timeframe that’s all.


Communication: 5/5

I sent the details on 7/21 and the OP responded right away stating that they would get started on the project. Communication while it was minimal was still good.

Report: 3.5/5

The report was easy to read and it was categorized by Profile EDU links, Web 2.0 links, SB to Web 2.0 links, Angela links and RSS. I spot checked links throughout the report. There were highs and lows as far as the report was concerned. My explanation is in the following:

In the profile EDU section, my only gripe here is that even though my anchored link was there, several of them were on pages that were not in English.

In the Web 2.0 links section, in spot checking, the pages were filled with content and my anchored link was there.

In the SB to Web 2.0 section particularly it was hit and miss. There were places were my keywords were used and there were pages where the long url was used without an anchor. I point it out because there was no mention that the link would be placed without an anchor prior to starting the work. I’m not sure if this was a limitation of where the link was placed or not. Further “spot checking” there were a couple instances where the page didn’t even exist as well.

In the Angela links section, in spot checking the links.. I didn’t have any problems here. Some links were unanchored and some weren’t. But I know that it depends on how each site will allow you to place the link as well.

RSS.. I'm not sure what the point of this section was the way it was laid out.


Overall: 4/5

Overall, I think that this is probably a good service for low to med competition niches. The niche I targeted for this service is hard. It’s too early to report on any SERP movement but if I see anything I’ll report back in this thread. I believe that with the diversity of links in what the OP is offering that this service does work. Thanks to the OP for the review copy.


My Recommendation: Recommended but only for low to medium niches based on this review.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom