This post is inspired by SEO_Mike's affiliate math 101 post a while back.
This happened to me last week. Thought I could generalize it, and turn it into an interesting 2-part problem.
So you're running an offer on X Network, and it's doing good, steady profit. An affiliate manager from Y Network bugs you to test out their latest and greatest "exclusive" offer. And you split test the offers throughout the day with your favorite tracking system. Here's what you see:
Network Clicks Conversions Payout EPC Revenue
X 350 35 $35 $3.50 $1,225
Y 150 18 $37 $4.44 $666
Question 1: What do you do now? (stop X network offer, stop Y network offer, etc)
Question 2: So being an experienced affiliate, you know that payout is not everything, and that EPC is. So being curious, you run some tests on your tracking system, and find out that even though your EPC on network Y is higher, for some reason, you're getting better ROI from running network X's offer. How can this be?
This happened to me last week. Thought I could generalize it, and turn it into an interesting 2-part problem.
So you're running an offer on X Network, and it's doing good, steady profit. An affiliate manager from Y Network bugs you to test out their latest and greatest "exclusive" offer. And you split test the offers throughout the day with your favorite tracking system. Here's what you see:
Network Clicks Conversions Payout EPC Revenue
X 350 35 $35 $3.50 $1,225
Y 150 18 $37 $4.44 $666
Question 1: What do you do now? (stop X network offer, stop Y network offer, etc)
Question 2: So being an experienced affiliate, you know that payout is not everything, and that EPC is. So being curious, you run some tests on your tracking system, and find out that even though your EPC on network Y is higher, for some reason, you're getting better ROI from running network X's offer. How can this be?