Link Wheel Development - Web 2.0 Properties - (Premium Service Based in the USA!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread FAQ

Here is a quick FAQ for this thread:

How long will it take to make a link wheel for me?

We can only service 2 – 4 clients / day depending on how large each clients link wheel is. There is often a waiting period for link wheel creation. MOST Link Wheel development is done with in 3 – 5 business days.

Do you create web 2.0 accounts for me?

No . . . well, Yes we will if you insist on it . . . . just email us if you REALLY want us to make the link wheel for you (separately out side of our network) and then manage it yourself, but take our advice you will not have near the impact than if you just let us manage it our way. The main problem is when you start mixing IP’s and uploading just 1 post, the web 2.0 properties will end up banning you as a “Spammer”. We use dedicated exclusive proxies across multiple Class C’s just to login to each property. We baby set this network because its golden for anyone who hopes on. If you want the logins, we will not grantee the work and there is a $25 surcharge for the additional labor . . . we will also not use our exclusive proxies to make the accounts with. (We just don't recommend this)

Can I choose the properties I want my site on?

No, unless you choose the high PR package, then by default you are choosing only high PR web 2.0 properties. Or you can order all 50 and by default you are choosing all of them.

Will I get a report?

Yes, we will send you a full report after the link wheel development is done.

Is there a long wait for your service?

Most of the time, there is a wait . . . just email us and ask how busy we are.

How many link wheels can you guys produce for me?

Here is the deal, right now we maintain 5 accounts on each of the 50+ web 2.0 properties. That gives us a total of 250 +/- accounts, but we never cross link the (properties / proxies) with each other. So in theory, we can build 5 complete link wheels for you with 50 + sites each. If you do decide this is the plan for you, contact us and we can arrange a decent discount.
 


Your service

"We use dedicated exclusive proxies across multiple Class C’s just to login to each property. We baby set this network because its golden for anyone who hopes on. If you want the logins, we will not grantee the work and there is a $25 surcharge for the additional labor . . . we will also not use our exclusive proxies to make the accounts with. (We just don't recommend this)"

The problem with this is if your accounts get banned for any reason or blacklisted then my link wheel is fucked. So how long do you guarntee that my links will stay up and how many clients will there be per web 2.0 property. Also please post one of your accounts here so we can see the structure because it sounds like I will get one page with my article on your huge spam blog with 100 different niche and clients. Your deal was sounding good but this concerns me please clarify.
 
Get-Rich-Or-Die >>>>>

Basically you have 2 choices with any link wheel development (service / offer) you obtain from us or otherwise.

#1 - You can opt to have the user names / login's provided to you (we will do that, but we don't recommend it). Then you start to blend IP's and create a footprint which results in a higher chance of profile closure.

#2 - You can let some us manage the accounts from the same IP that was originally used to create the account profiles in the first place.

These are your only options outside of doing the work yourself.


****************************

Next, we don't guarantee that your links wills stay up forever (neither will the guys from India and Pakistan) who will create mass link wheels from the same IP.

This is the core reason we choose to maintain the network, because we know what works and what doesn't.

Again, this service is based on quality and I just refuse to try and compete with my mid-eastern friends who will provide you with a pile of crap for $20 . . .

****************************

Posting one of my accounts here will do nothing but get it banned for sure, so I think I will pass on that.

****************************

Your concern over the accounts being generic would be liked to saying "wordpress.com" is generic or "hubpages" is generic.

What gives the authority is the content pertaining to the wheel itself (not the account).

View any real "personal" blog you go to will have multiple post about a variety of topics.

To further expand on this we also use filler content so that every post is not linked to some kind of "wheel".

****************************

**Almost done with the mod's wheel and then they can chime in**

TacoBell
 
Posting one of my accounts here will do nothing but get it banned for sure, so I think I will pass on that.
I highly doubt that if you used an image to show the url or just even the subdomain name

--

#1 - You can opt to have the user names / login's provided to you (we will do that, but we don't recommend it). Then you start to blend IP's and create a footprint which results in a higher chance of profile closure.
It doesnt blend and you can use different IP's all the same when creating new accounts for every buyer

Get rich or die trying has a very valid point all posts on one account will be lost if the account gets banned

other then that the post loses many values such as having the keyword inside the subdomain and losing seo relavence as all posts on that subdomain have no topical contingency or relavence and other factors

and getting banned is far from using just the same ip this can be for many reasons
including just having one link to many or the wrong links or topics or a mod of that site who isnt in the mood...cause sure as hell with so many posts on one account ur gonna attract attention

My take: you just doing this to get a revenue share out of these sites which most of them offer so to keep all logins as NONE of what you say makes any sense
or use them later to mass alter links to your own choice

Your trying to save time to not having to create all the new accounts and keep them for revenue share well mr the only benfit is to you and your lazyness for that


Next, we don't guarantee that your links wills stay up forever (neither will the guys from India and Pakistan) who will create mass link wheels from the same IP.

Again, this service is based on quality and I just refuse to try and compete with my mid-eastern friends who will provide you with a pile of crap for $20 . . .
There have yet to be web 20 properties that cross reference ips from each others database... lmfao

Besides I cant see you doing anything here different then any of the indians and Pk people they are doing no less then you and it is just Rude to state that they are doing inferior work!
 
I am a gay whore!

I agree!

Like I said mate, I don't really care what you think is best or what the other guys (YOU) are doing . . . I have been doing this long enough I know what works.

If I wanted to rape people for $250, then I would go buy from you!

Everyone here is welcome to go use your overpriced service . . .

So stop hi-jaking this thread, because you are not a legit buyer nor do you have any legitimat interest other than trying to tarnish this service and to trash this thread.

Now go piss off D*bag!

nanexo.png
 
I'm glad that Nanexo and others have brought some info about this to light. I'm not buying the convoluted explanation on the IP's. If I understand, you are saying that you won't give us the account/passwords because the account will get banned if we log on to it with a different IP.

That just makes no sense. Plenty of people log on to the interwebs from different locations (work, home, coffee shop, anywhere with WIFI), and all of these are going to have different IP addresses. Hell, my home interwebs connection is dynamic, so my IP changes all the time.

If you are just creating one account for each web property and putting all of your customers on the same account and page - just say so up front.

Oh, and being a dick on your own sales thread might not be the best idea if you are looking for customers. I understand this is WF and anything goes, but Nanexo had some good points, and dissing Indians for no apparent reason was not cool.
 
I'm glad that Nanexo and others have brought some info about this to light. I'm not buying the convoluted explanation on the IP's. If I understand, you are saying that you won't give us the account/passwords because the account will get banned if we log on to it with a different IP.

That just makes no sense. Plenty of people log on to the interwebs from different locations (work, home, coffee shop, anywhere with WIFI), and all of these are going to have different IP addresses. Hell, my home interwebs connection is dynamic, so my IP changes all the time.

If you are just creating one account for each web property and putting all of your customers on the same account and page - just say so up front.

Oh, and being a dick on your own sales thread might not be the best idea if you are looking for customers. I understand this is WF and anything goes, but Nanexo had some good points, and dissing Indians for no apparent reason was not cool.

Nanexo frames the question so that he can win the argument.

He is offering a similar service, so of course he will try his best to shoot holes through it.

I never dissed indians, and I drew a clear distinction from the start (via the FAQ page) of how this service would work. . . I myself do not want my link wheels created with a IP from India . . . WHY? Because I have got a TON of accounts banned from using these guys.

Hence, We developed this process that is a sure-fire solution and provides MAXIMUM life for your back links.

Again, I state categorically either you understand this service or you don't.

If you don't then please don't waste my time, and I wont waste yours.
 
Alright, I have to give my 2 cents here about the disses going on in this thread...

Go check out nanexo's threads and you will see that he is offering the same service... from india.
I get the fact that he wants to put up a fight but to come in someone elses very legit efforts is the dick move.
I looked at nanexo's previous post and it seems all he can do is go from thread to thread trashing other peoples service.
If I didn’t know better I would swear the 2 of you are working together (probably from the same office in India) or you are the same guy.

Why don't you guys simmer down and let the work speak for itself when the mods come back with their review.
 
Your Service

I see what your doing Taco you think because you are american you can use your racism to make it seem like your work is better. When infact it is worse because you have all the power. Basically you are using web 2.0 properties to make a directory of people that paid you to make link wheels for them then any niche you want you can just add your link later. Well I will pass but I like your thinking you make it seem like your doing me a favour with different ips and you dont recommend we control our own because your accounts and proxys are the best and you speak english and do better work in USA :bowdown:.
Why dont you go :action-smiley-052: yourself with this shit sell it on DP or something.
 
Geezer tits . . . what a fiasco.

I suppose you work with the other 2 in India?

I am not racist, I love outsourcing to India and Pakistan . . . I even offered to recommend a great chap in Pakistan who does an amazing job at building link wheels that get shut down super fast.
 
Okay, here's my review...

tacobell got my URL's and keywords and went to work. He completed the work in a the time promised.

I realize that when you give a free review copy you almost expect to get a great review, and I wish I could give one. There are some things that I'm not excited about with his service. Does that mean he can't tweak things and make it better? No. But I'm not reviewing the "what if" I'm reviewing the here and now.

So, I got the list back. None of the Web 2.0 properties are related to my site. They are all random names like: "bobsblog.weebly.com" (that's not actually one of the properties, just a made up example) instead of "keyword.weebly.com". It could be argued that these sites are still better than a brand new blog (that is focused on the subject). But I would rather have something laser focused on the keyword / subject and also have the login details.

My subject matter is one post in a blog of posts of random subjects. The other problem I have with this is that I can other people's niches and their landing pages as well as they can see mine. Some of the subject matter of the other posts are niches that I avoid with a 10 meter cattle prod. So having my site / links next to those is even more disturbing.

Final verdict: I think tacobell has some work to do to make this a great service, but the potential is definitely there. His pricing is reasonable, and his turnaround time is fantastic.

Would I use him again? Yes, if he makes the changes I mentioned before.

/edit/ Someone pointed out to me that tacobell never said anything about creating brand new sites or providing the login details. That was my fault for misunderstanding the OP. That being the case, he DID deliver what he promised - I was just expecting more or something different.

Left him positive feedback because he did deliver exactly what he said he would, and I can't fault someone else for my high expectations.
 
Taco completed the work incredibly fast. He obviously has his shit together when it comes to the turn around time. The report is also very comprehensive and shows where each of the articles are located and how the link wheel is used.

While my website is public knowledge, and I have no concerns who knows about it, I can see how other people would be concerned with the fact that others can see their landing pages. That is the typical use for a service like this so it would be better for business if Taco provided user name and login to the customers and kept only one customer per blog. This leads me to my next point.

If you keep it at one blog per customer, then you can focus on that particular customers keywords when it comes to the blog URL/subdomain. Also, while I understood the content to be machine spun from one original article, I was not able to find an article that sounded coherent. This isnt the most important factor if we are only looking for SEO purposes, however, if the content reads as spammy, that could be bad. Also, the titles of the blog entries could have been more relevant to our keywords selected.

Overall, as SEO Mike stated, the service has potential. There are just some things that need to be tweaked to improve the service. I'd advice Taco to provide a free review to another person after he makes these tweaks to his service so that people will be able to see that the changes have been made.

If anyone would like to see some examples of his work, feel free to PM me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.