Ted Kennedy is Dead.



No, it really can't.

PIRA never dealt drugs, no matter what your politicians tell you.
PIRA never killed someone based on religion, the UVF killed over 300 people simply because they were catholics, most were not even supporters of the IRA.
Loyalist had people like the Shankill Butchers in their ranks, pyschopathic murderers. When was the last time a republican went around Loyalist communities carving random people up with butcher knifes?
What about the pogrom of Bombay street, when was the last time Republicans burnt innocent people out of their homes, and marched triumphantly around them?

I could go back 800 years into the raping of Ireland by British hands, but I won't embarrass you anymore than I already have.

I'm done, take the British tinted glasses off next time!

I've been trying to avoid getting drawn into this off-topic debate but please...

'New proof' links IRA to drug terror | UK news | The Observer

Killings at Coolacrease - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That took literally seconds to find and please don't say The Guardian is a front for the UK government because of all the media they are more often than not among the most critical and unbiased.

You admitted yourself that they smuggled cigarettes and considering the health implications you'd have to be either very brainwashed or fuckin stupid to think that is some how better than dealing in most other drugs.

Unfortunately mate, the situation in NI has never been as black and white as you seem to think it is and as with Israel/Palestine it is only made worse by people on either side insisting they are 100% right and failing to see the other point of view.

BTW, go back 800 years and Britain didn't exist.
 
mt1102615526.jpg
 
The Jack Daniels distillery sighed a breath of relief this morning with the passing of Ted Kennedy, as now they would have enough booze for the rest of us to enjoy as well.
 
I've been trying to avoid getting drawn into this off-topic debate but please...

'New proof' links IRA to drug terror | UK news | The Observer

Killings at Coolacrease - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That took literally seconds to find and please don't say The Guardian is a front for the UK government because of all the media they are more often than not among the most critical and unbiased.

You admitted yourself that they smuggled cigarettes and considering the health implications you'd have to be either very brainwashed or fuckin stupid to think that is some how better than dealing in most other drugs.

Unfortunately mate, the situation in NI has never been as black and white as you seem to think it is and as with Israel/Palestine it is only made worse by people on either side insisting they are 100% right and failing to see the other point of view.

BTW, go back 800 years and Britain didn't exist.

Are you saying the PIRA existed in 1921? They didn't.

"New evidence has been uncovered to link the Provisional IRA with a terrorist group involved in the Colombian drugs trade"

How does that prove that the PIRA were dealing drugs you dumbass?

They bought weapons off them fool.

'NI' does not exist, it is a plastic state, which will soon be taken apart.

I know very few people that have been killed from smoking cigarettes, in fact it has very few mental effect, whereas other drugs tend to kill a lot sooner, and have mental implications.
 
Please go back and study American Patriots, thank you.


Dying in service to your country, that's not patriotism right? Or, let me guess, only Republicans can be patriots.....

I've got a newsflash for you dear - our enemies don't care about liberal or conservative, republican or democrat. They would just as soon nuke you as me.

It's sad that this kind of stuff means so much to you.....

I can't stand alot of the fear mongering, hate spewing far right republicans out there. But if some foreign entity attacked them took them prisoner, I'd encourage my bros to put on a uniform and go kick their ass - then I'd ask questions later. But that's just how I was raised...
 
Dying in service to your country, that's not patriotism right? Or, let me guess, only Republicans can be patriots.....

I suggest you look up the definitions of liberalism and patriotism and tell me those aren't contradictory when read in the context of the ideals America was founded on.

I've got a newsflash for you dear - our enemies don't care about liberal or conservative, republican or democrat. They would just as soon nuke you as me.

This is one of the most sensible things I have ever heard you say. Agreed.

It's sad that this kind of stuff means so much to you.....

You obviously don't know me.
The methodical and deliberate efforts to dismantle capitalism for purposes of expanding control by statists who care nothing about the American way of life is what means so much to me.

I can't stand alot of the fear mongering, hate spewing far right republicans out there.

I don't want to see my country turn into Europe, that's not hate spewing to vocalize it. You are so quick to generalize people you don't know - it's almost like NBC lined you all up and gave you an injection or something.

But if some foreign entity attacked them took them prisoner, I'd encourage my bros to put on a uniform and go kick their ass - then I'd ask questions later.

Agree again.

But that's just how I was raised...

This is where you lose me every time. Smug, elitism will soon be the catalyst in the ruination of liberals.
 
I suggest you look up the definitions of liberalism and patriotism and tell me those aren't contradictory when read in the context of the ideals America was founded on.

Perhaps you weren't being literal, but I have no problem being corrected on something. So please show me the contradiction between 1) The OFFICIAL definition of liberalism and the "ideals America was founded on" which I am turning to the declaration of independence to define.

So here goes:


lib·er·al·ism (l
ibreve.gif
b
prime.gif
schwa.gif
r-
schwa.gif
-l
ibreve.gif
z
lprime.gif
schwa.gif
m, l
ibreve.gif
b
prime.gif
r
schwa.gif
-)n.1. The state or quality of being liberal.
2. a. A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority.
b. often Liberalism The tenets or policies of a Liberal party.

3. An economic theory in favor of laissez-faire, the free market, and the gold standard.
4. Liberalisma. A 19th-century Protestant movement that favored free intellectual inquiry, stressed the ethical and humanitarian content of Christianity, and de-emphasized dogmatic theology.
b. A 19th-century Roman Catholic movement that favored political democracy and ecclesiastical reform but was theologically orthodox.

---

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
w.gif
hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.


[continued in next post]
 
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.


So please, enlighten those of us who 1) don't know what an American patriot is and 2) don't see the contradiction between one set of political beliefs (liberalism) and the principles America was founded on.....
 
lib·er·al·ism (l
ibreve.gif
b
prime.gif
schwa.gif
r-
schwa.gif
-l
ibreve.gif
z
lprime.gif
schwa.gif
m, l
ibreve.gif
b
prime.gif
r
schwa.gif
-)n.1. The state or quality of being liberal.
2. a. A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority.
b. often Liberalism The tenets or policies of a Liberal party.

3. An economic theory in favor of laissez-faire, the free market, and the gold standard.
4. Liberalisma. A 19th-century Protestant movement that favored free intellectual inquiry, stressed the ethical and humanitarian content of Christianity, and de-emphasized dogmatic theology.
b. A 19th-century Roman Catholic movement that favored political democracy and ecclesiastical reform but was theologically orthodox.

Source please.