Any GOOD Wordpress rewriter plugin?

x-ray

x-ray

Banned
Sep 3, 2009
28
0
0
There are a few rewriters around, but most leaves JS traces in the source code.
Search Engines might see this as a blackhat tactic and punish your site by "cheating" with such plugins.
My question is, is there a rewriter plugin around what rewrites articles AND rss server side (php)?
So the rewriter process is done on the server before it will be publish.

That way there will be no traces leaving in the source code.

Bad rewriters (in my opinion) that leaves traces are:

-. goscript.net/featured-articles/wordpress-uniquefier-plugin.html

-. dupemagic.com

-. wpwriteagain.com
 


JS = Javascript
I mean Javascript Obfuscated code is visible in the source.

An example is here:

justnlp.com

Check the source code.
 
x-ray said:
JS = Javascript
I mean Javascript Obfuscated code is visible in the source.

An example is here:

justnlp.com

Check the source code.
Click to expand...

Umm that is basically like outing a landing page.

It is"#173;" heaven.
 
Drake said:
Umm that is basically like outing a landing page.

It is"#173;" heaven.
Click to expand...

It's full of these "#173;" type of codes by using such plugins as i described in my #1 post.

What do you mean "basically outing a landing page"?
It's a code what let the search engines think the content is unique but the real visitor keep seeing the same content.
Thats what that code does.
 
Yeah, outing LP's is not too hot :D

Can you list your ideal feature set, x-ray?

Might be able to help.
 
SpamHat said:
Yeah, outing LP's is not too hot :D

Can you list your ideal feature set, x-ray?

Might be able to help.
Click to expand...


Well it seems there is no full server side rewriter (or i must have missed something).
So the rewriter must rewrite the RSS and Posts (i use the wordpressrobot.com plugin) without on the server in php, instead of javascript obfuscating in the source code.

Is there a plugin what can do that?
 
I'm, not positive - haven't seen anything recently.

I've had some ideas for a WP unique content plugin thingie for a while. The approach I want to take will take some work - and maybe a side project to pull together.

That url you mentioned is just blank btw
 
SpamHat said:
I'm, not positive - haven't seen anything recently.

I've had some ideas for a WP unique content plugin thingie for a while. The approach I want to take will take some work - and maybe a side project to pull together.

That url you mentioned is just blank btw
Click to expand...

Would be a nice thing if you can develop a plugin what can do as i described.
Wich url do you mean?
wordpressrobot.com it works for me.

Try it again if you want (i tried it yet again).
 
I just tried through a bunch of proxies. It's not in the G cache either.
Do you mean wprobot.net ??

Yeah, planning to make some plugin for unique content - will be a few weeks tho.
 
SpamHat said:
I just tried through a bunch of proxies. It's not in the G cache either.
Do you mean wprobot.net ??

Yeah, planning to make some plugin for unique content - will be a few weeks tho.
Click to expand...

Yes thats the one i mean.
When i go wordpressrobot.com i get the same by the way.
Who cares ;)

If you create a plugin as i described (as far as i know) you'll have a unique plugin that is undetectable then.
Hope you get it to be compatible to work with Wordpress Robot as well.
And RSS scrapers that rewrite titles and content.

Maybe an idea, to let users be able to include their own .txt or .php file with keywords in their own language.
 
I am skeptical that putting the soft hyphen (­ or &#shy;) all over your page will fool the duplicate content engines. I have not tried it, have you?

I can't really see it hurting either, because the SHY is (ab)used by CSS folks to get word wrapping to work when you have really long characters of strings with no spaces.

wbr
 
Victory said:
I am skeptical that putting the soft hyphen (GAY or &#shy;) all over your page will fool the duplicate content engines. I have not tried it, have you?

I can't really see it hurting either, because the SHY is (ab)used by CSS folks to get word wrapping to work when you have really long characters of strings with no spaces.

wbr
Click to expand...

Well, i don't say my thoughts about it are right.
I just share my opinion that after installing these plugins the source code change to these strange signs.
And if you can see it, then Search Engines too.
So you might be punished for that by Search Engines.
And if that risk is simply to prevent by using a plugin what does not change the change the source code at all then i think it feels more confident to use it.
 
^^ Agree.

If you can go over the source code line by line and find nothing strange then Goog can't either.
 
you want to jumble up your text with substitute HTML codes? Moronic thing to do, but if you REALLY want to, here ya go.

<?php

function edit($text)
{
$letters1="abcde";
$letters2="fghij";
$letters3="klmno";
$letters4="pqrst";
$letters5="uvwxy";

srand((float) microtime() * 10000000);

$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters1[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters1[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters2[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters2[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters3[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters3[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters4[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters4[$the_letter]),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace($letters5[$the_letter],"&#".ord($letters5[$the_letter]),$text);

$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters1[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters1[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters2[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters2[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters3[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters3[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters4[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters4[$the_letter])),$text);
$the_letter=rand(0,4);
$text=str_replace(strtoupper($letters5[$the_letter]),"&#".ord(strtoupper($letters5[$the_letter])),$text);

return ">".$text."<";
}

function rewrite_text( $article, $case_sensitive=false ) {
$workwith=$article;
$workwith="STARTARTICLEHERE>".$workwith."<ENDARTICLEHERE";
$workwith=preg_replace('~>(.*?)<~se', 'edit("$1")', $workwith);
$workwith=str_replace("STARTARTICLEHERE>","",$workwith);
$workwith=str_replace("<ENDARTICLEHERE","",$workwith);

$workwith=stripslashes($workwith);
return $workwith;
}

add_filter('the_content', 'rewrite_text', 2);
add_filter('the_excerpt', 'rewrite_text', 2);
?>
 
The best way currently to rewrite content is to translate it several times using different combinations of languages and services like from English>German->French->English - but that still will produce crap, but more readable than using those synonymizers or tricks with JS...
 
satanus said:
The best way currently to rewrite content is to translate it several times using different combinations of languages and services like from English>German->French->English - but that still will produce crap, but more readable than using those synonymizers or tricks with JS...
Click to expand...

Well the stuff with JS (most of it) makes the content 100% readable - just makes crappy code.

I've done some stuff with translating content and I find that English->Spanish->English gives better results than others.
 
SpamHat said:
I've done some stuff with translating content and I find that English->Spanish->English gives better results than others.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the tip. English->German->English might work too as English is partly a Germanic based language. Until the French mucked it up with silent constanants. :crap:
 
language translation? fucking noobs. Almost as stooopid as the 'uniquifier' code I posted above.

the modern generation of rewriters can write better than YOU clowns can, actually.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom