Wait til they discover the Lolicon section...



lol at all the teen rape on a train advocates...unless i'm missing something (and i probably am after 10 rum and cokes)

Hetalia__Yes_We_Can_by_Otaku_Chick.jpg
 
In the end it comes down to this IMO... sitting inside your skull is the greatest computer of all time. And it reacts to "programming" just like any other computer. You keep programming it with shit, eventually that 'shit' will start, to differing degrees, to affect your judgement, decision making & reactions.

If, as reported on Slashdot, magnetic fields can affect a persons moral judgement, what does exposure to thousands of hours of violence & graphic sex scenes do over time? Nothing? I doubt it.

In a 1992 study it was estimated that by the time a kid reaches 18 they've been exposed to 200,000 acts of violence on TV. And the concern then, 18 yrs ago is the same now, i.e "that children who are inundated with the images of shootings, bombings and rapes will become desensitized to such violent acts and possibly learn to see them as valid responses to life's stresses."

But then of course, if all the world is morally degenerating at the same rate, how do you benchmark what's normal any more?
Is our society today a replay of the Roman times when people derived their entertainment from violent & bloody circuses & sexual perversions? Appears that way to me.
And we all know the way Rome went after that.


I'm definitely not comfortable with the rape/violence theme and such, but I feel that if they start banning one thing, it'll be precedence to ban lesser themes, until basically 'above moderate' items are censored for the sake of the feeble minded.
 
I'm definitely not comfortable with the rape/violence theme and such, but I feel that if they start banning one thing, it'll be precedence to ban lesser themes, until basically 'above moderate' items are censored for the sake of the feeble minded.

I'm of the thought that you have to draw a line in the sand somewhere. But where that line is drawn is the stumbling block for many.

I tend to follow the principle I was taught on how to approach life:
Is what you about to do or engage in up-building to yourself? Or will it tear you down? That principle has worked well over the years,
 
Either people are free to do whatever floats their boat or they are not. As long as something does not harm another person against their will, that thing should be legal.

For example.

Child porn involving actual children should be illegal, because it harms children involved in the creation of that item. Children are too immature to make decisions that impact their life, so adults have to make the decision that results in less harm.
Child porn involving computer generated children should not be illegal, because nobody is harmed during the creation of that item.
Charging someone with online enticement should continue to be legal, because the person charged with it was intending on meeting up with a real child, not a computer-generated child.

MMA fights should be legal. Two adults enter, knowing they are going to get hurt. By the application of this logic, licensed duels should also be legal.
Running up to someone in the street and punching them in the face should be illegal, because only one participant is willing.
Computer games involving massive blood and gore when I rip out your computer avatar's still-beating heart should be legal. The only real damage done there is your ego - because you have been pwned.

Marrying 8 willing adult women should be legal. 9 adults want to get married, they should be able to do so.
Marrying 8 willing adult women and a goat and a tree should not be legal. Goats and trees cannot give consent. You will just have to settle for fucking that goat out of wedlock, sir. And, Mr. Treefucker, you're just a sick fucker.

Just because something is not illegal doesn't mean that the item should not be vilified by civilized people. Mr. Goatfucker is an idiot. I should be free to call him an idiot to his face, right before the duel.

If all it takes to get something banned is the majority of people being against that thing, we're going to see a lot of things banned and a lot of freedom lost.

Why isn't freedom cherished anymore?

We need it, badly. We've been without real freedom for so long that we forget what it is like. Instead, we have a society where people call for the banning of anything that offends them and the politicians looking for higher poll numbers respond with glee.
 
idk some of these games are kind of fun. I've beaten do you like horny bunnies 1 and 2. I'd like to see some american ones, though they'd be really shit granted, but it might be okay.

Those games are awesome, I laughed so hard I had to stop playing to recover.
RapeLay is pretty twisted though. I mean I'm all for twisted, I can sit and watch Takashi Miike films all day long, but that one was sick :ugone2far:
It did still contain the messages that god loves rapists and if you fail to impregnate girls you DIE. that made me lol.
 
Those games are awesome, I laughed so hard I had to stop playing to recover.
RapeLay is pretty twisted though. I mean I'm all for twisted, I can sit and watch Takashi Miike films all day long, but that one was sick :ugone2far:
It did still contain the messages that god loves rapists and if you fail to impregnate girls you DIE. that made me lol.

I've never played RapePlay, I might have to now, but for reals, the dating sims are kind of fun. It's like part rpg and part choose your own adventure book. They're actually really fun. I'd recommend Do You Like Horny Bunnies 1 and 2 to people if you're into that. A lot of the 3D ones kind of blow though. I also beat this Love Hina one on the GBA for some reason, it was only like 2 hours long.
 
I've never played RapePlay, I might have to now, but for reals, the dating sims are kind of fun. It's like part rpg and part choose your own adventure book. They're actually really fun. I'd recommend Do You Like Horny Bunnies 1 and 2 to people if you're into that. A lot of the 3D ones kind of blow though. I also beat this Love Hina one on the GBA for some reason, it was only like 2 hours long.

lets meow meow is another that made me laugh a lot, but I don't remember it being quite as graphic. my idiot of an ex infected all 3 computers downloading rapelay though, so I dunno if theres a clean version.
 
This is rather funny, but I agree it has been around for years. I don't think that having a game where you rape girls is going to cause more girls to get raped. If video games were really so influential we would have some serious fucking problems due to the nature of our games.

Why isn't there this much out cry form CNN about Australia banning small breasts from everything. Because small breasts means thoughts of little girls which means pedos! Ohz Noz!

Edit: ROFL at the CNN reporting, she makes it sound like we need to go to war with Japan. Japan craps all over women's rights and has pornographic games! These hedonistic non-Christians need to taken care of, Oh the outcry!
 
Also, how ironic is it that Japan has all these violent rape cartoon games and cartoons and yet has puritanical laws censoring nudity? Have they ever put two and two together and thought maybe what's causing these dudes to have these whacko violent fantasies is the fact that they titillate them with the real deal and then blur out the whole point of porn? No wonder there's so many blueballed frustrated Japanese dudes.

That's got nothing to do with it. The pixelation of porn stems from old taboos about genitalia. But the only reason the pixelation is still illegal is because Yakuza want to corner both a mainstream market with the pixelated porn, and an underground market willing to pay premium prices for machines that remove the pixelation. Yakuza are extremely well-connected with law makers and bureaucrats.

If I had to speculate about the source of the fantasies here I would say it's because the culture in general is so stiff and procedural and polite and conformist that when time comes for an escape, people really fucking escape and indulge all their pent-up tendencies all at once. Most people here understand the need for that escapism, and see it as necessary for social cohesion and maintaining conformity outside of those narrow escape avenues. One is sexual escapism via porn (not the sex trade, I think that serves a different purpose here), and another is alcohol, which allows them to say whatever crazy shit they want within a limited context, and the next day everybody knows that nothing said during the drinking binge has any validity anymore. That limited escapism is accepted. But try that shit during your 9 to 5? You'll be an instant outcast.

Some of the stuff here is sick, but the point is that almost nobody does it in real life. It's made for porn.

Note: child porn is definitely illegal in Japan. The debate is over virtual imagery. But I've never heard of anything involving kids, it's teen school girls etc.

Go Japan. This is my 'hood.

68221_c450.jpg
 
Google Images (with safe search filter turned off) -> Type in Lolicon , nuff said.

Well, I've never seen any lolicon stuff with girls that young-looking in actual sex acts, just "cute" characters looking "adorable" or whatever the reader thinks of it. I see a couple sexual ones in the search results, but those are written in Spanish or Portuguese or something. I've never seen that here, and I live on a street full of porn shops and manga shops.

Anyway, you picked out that one point but the more important point was that the debate is over virtual imagery, not real images.
 
Anyway, you picked out that one point but the more important point was that the debate is over virtual imagery, not real images.

Right, I know, but I was just pointing out how you said 'never' which I'd kind of find hard to believe.

Speaking of rape role play (shame can't find the video itself on youtube) hehe
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01MRUuTM5TE]YouTube - Lip my stocking[/ame]
 
However, even if what I said is completely untrue the government has no right to censor what type of cartoons/games people should have access to behind closed doors. Your argument is nanny gov't which does not seem consistent with your usual pro-freedom stance.

Hmm, sure sounds like a republican to me.
 
I'm confused, I've always been under the impression that most republicans were for sacrificing civil liberties for the sake of security.

absolutely, and for more government control of people's lives. Small government only applies to taxes. I was refering to hellblazer's stance, not cardine's response.
 

I made it to Part 17 (XVII) before I got tired of reading it. But I wonder what would be the worse vice this guy could have thought of in the late 1800, that also wouldn't be considered some form of Satanism or mental illness :P

And I wonder how many ways you can interpret this:

A man enters into no moral or legal obligation with his wife or children to do anything for them, except what he can do consistently with his own personal freedom, and his natural right to control his own property at his own discretion.

:P I guess like in the old days, its not rape if they're married. But also seems like you could get married pretty young here in the early days of the US.

2. The statute book of Massachusetts makes ten years the age at which a female child is supposed to have discretion enough to part with her virtue. But the same statute book holds that no person, man or woman, of any age, or any degree of wisdom or experience, has discretion enough to be trusted to buy and drink a glass of spirits, on his or her own judgement! What an illustration of the legislative wisdom of Massachusetts!