Advanced 4 Tier Link Structure! Upto 570 Properties! All Dofollow! Reviews Available!
- Thread starter hoot33
- Start date
- Status
Hey all,
Quick Update.
NoahWells, Grindstone and Seous packages have all been completed on my end and are just having the finishing touches put on them.
Bofu2U and Kaedus are being started momentarily.
Also,
I had to scrap the article directories being used as account authorizations and article moderation was blowing my TAT to hell so the new list of sites being used is located in the main thread.
ALSO,
TAT for package 2 has been increased to 4 - 6 days. Just to give me a little time if I get bogged down with orders.
Thanks all.
D
Quick Update.
NoahWells, Grindstone and Seous packages have all been completed on my end and are just having the finishing touches put on them.
Bofu2U and Kaedus are being started momentarily.
Also,
I had to scrap the article directories being used as account authorizations and article moderation was blowing my TAT to hell so the new list of sites being used is located in the main thread.
ALSO,
TAT for package 2 has been increased to 4 - 6 days. Just to give me a little time if I get bogged down with orders.
Thanks all.
D
Just got my report back. Overdelivered in volume in a big way, like 221 total urls. Going to dig in deeper after I eat so I can leave a detailed review. Just posting this so I can find it again quickly.
My Review
Turnaround Time: Not sure here, tbh, as I wasn't promised a turnaround time. I see that it's 4-6 days in the thread and we're close enough to make me happy. A few days in the grand scheme of things SEO related is inconsequential, IMO. Quality takes time.
Quality: 4.5/5 Nice, huge diverse portfolio of parasite hosts here. Just played follow that click for almost 20 minutes and didn't see any duplicate themes, so some effort definitely went into this. Spinning was obviously done by hand, as it was totally readable. It wasn't spun super deep, however. I generally like mine spun out to 40%+ but that always effects readability too. Overall, it's good enough for the tier two and lower properties, I'd like to see the 6 sites pointing at my site be more unique but I'm probably splitting hairs. Also noticed while cruising thru properties clicking around, that every once in awhile there's only one link out, to the tier above and no second link to another property in the same tier. Not sure if that's an oversight or by design, but I like it.
SERP Improvement: Will monitor it as it's way too early to make any calls but there's no way a linking setup like this won't have a good effect. I'll report back in a week and then again in three with SERP updates.
Overall: Gonna have to go with 4.5/5 as quality was the only criteria I was able to score this close to completion. Reserving the right to come back in and change it if/when this package stops the massive google dance my site is currently undergoing.*
*Don't stress, Hoot33, I know you're tracking my position here too and probably freaking out it was frontpage when you started and mid page 19 now...don't be...google is a bitch and does this to me on this site every 10-14 days for the last two months. If this package stops that crap and helps that site stick full time, I'm your new biggest fan!
Turnaround Time: Not sure here, tbh, as I wasn't promised a turnaround time. I see that it's 4-6 days in the thread and we're close enough to make me happy. A few days in the grand scheme of things SEO related is inconsequential, IMO. Quality takes time.
Quality: 4.5/5 Nice, huge diverse portfolio of parasite hosts here. Just played follow that click for almost 20 minutes and didn't see any duplicate themes, so some effort definitely went into this. Spinning was obviously done by hand, as it was totally readable. It wasn't spun super deep, however. I generally like mine spun out to 40%+ but that always effects readability too. Overall, it's good enough for the tier two and lower properties, I'd like to see the 6 sites pointing at my site be more unique but I'm probably splitting hairs. Also noticed while cruising thru properties clicking around, that every once in awhile there's only one link out, to the tier above and no second link to another property in the same tier. Not sure if that's an oversight or by design, but I like it.
SERP Improvement: Will monitor it as it's way too early to make any calls but there's no way a linking setup like this won't have a good effect. I'll report back in a week and then again in three with SERP updates.
Overall: Gonna have to go with 4.5/5 as quality was the only criteria I was able to score this close to completion. Reserving the right to come back in and change it if/when this package stops the massive google dance my site is currently undergoing.*
*Don't stress, Hoot33, I know you're tracking my position here too and probably freaking out it was frontpage when you started and mid page 19 now...don't be...google is a bitch and does this to me on this site every 10-14 days for the last two months. If this package stops that crap and helps that site stick full time, I'm your new biggest fan!
Turnaround Time: Not sure here, tbh, as I wasn't promised a turnaround time. I see that it's 4-6 days in the thread and we're close enough to make me happy. A few days in the grand scheme of things SEO related is inconsequential, IMO. Quality takes time.
Quality: 4.5/5 Nice, huge diverse portfolio of parasite hosts here. Just played follow that click for almost 20 minutes and didn't see any duplicate themes, so some effort definitely went into this. Spinning was obviously done by hand, as it was totally readable. It wasn't spun super deep, however. I generally like mine spun out to 40%+ but that always effects readability too. Overall, it's good enough for the tier two and lower properties, I'd like to see the 6 sites pointing at my site be more unique but I'm probably splitting hairs. Also noticed while cruising thru properties clicking around, that every once in awhile there's only one link out, to the tier above and no second link to another property in the same tier. Not sure if that's an oversight or by design, but I like it.
SERP Improvement: Will monitor it as it's way too early to make any calls but there's no way a linking setup like this won't have a good effect. I'll report back in a week and then again in three with SERP updates.
Overall: Gonna have to go with 4.5/5 as quality was the only criteria I was able to score this close to completion. Reserving the right to come back in and change it if/when this package stops the massive google dance my site is currently undergoing.*
*Don't stress, Hoot33, I know you're tracking my position here too and probably freaking out it was frontpage when you started and mid page 19 now...don't be...google is a bitch and does this to me on this site every 10-14 days for the last two months. If this package stops that crap and helps that site stick full time, I'm your new biggest fan!
Lol Thanks for the awesome review grindstone.
I noticed the dance the second day I tracked your serps lol I was like "aww shit really?? he's gonna be pissed lol" So I'm glad you put my mind at ease.
Come back anytime pal. Your business is always good here.
D
REVIEW:
Turnaround Time: No complaints. OP stayed in communication throughout and was delivered on-time. It's nice for an OP to keep me updated and in this case, I was never "guessing" as to if my project was underway or not.
Quality: 4.25/5 As the OP mentioned, the Article Dirs were abandoned in place of properties. The main 6 Tier 1 props were good articles, but I would have preferred spinning to be deeper. However, the Tier 2 and 3 props all contained some seriously varied anchor texts and phrases that were on-point to my niche. In other words, it didn't "look" like it was an intentional tiered setup. I really liked the way he did this with some long tail phrases.
Less than 24 hours after project delivery, 4 of the 6 tier 1 sites are indexed. I am monitoring the others and expect them to be indexed fairly soon based on the upper tier count.
SERP Improvement: Still at #15 and #16 for my keywords, but will monitor as the weeks go by. I don't plan on doing anything else to this site to see effectiveness of the service.
Overall: 4.3 / 5.0 Only improvements I would suggest are reporting and spinning level. The report doesn't break down each tier beyond Tier 1, so you have to manually go thru each one to see where it's pointing, etc. Despite this - I would order this again for sure.
Turnaround Time: No complaints. OP stayed in communication throughout and was delivered on-time. It's nice for an OP to keep me updated and in this case, I was never "guessing" as to if my project was underway or not.
Quality: 4.25/5 As the OP mentioned, the Article Dirs were abandoned in place of properties. The main 6 Tier 1 props were good articles, but I would have preferred spinning to be deeper. However, the Tier 2 and 3 props all contained some seriously varied anchor texts and phrases that were on-point to my niche. In other words, it didn't "look" like it was an intentional tiered setup. I really liked the way he did this with some long tail phrases.
Less than 24 hours after project delivery, 4 of the 6 tier 1 sites are indexed. I am monitoring the others and expect them to be indexed fairly soon based on the upper tier count.
SERP Improvement: Still at #15 and #16 for my keywords, but will monitor as the weeks go by. I don't plan on doing anything else to this site to see effectiveness of the service.
Overall: 4.3 / 5.0 Only improvements I would suggest are reporting and spinning level. The report doesn't break down each tier beyond Tier 1, so you have to manually go thru each one to see where it's pointing, etc. Despite this - I would order this again for sure.
Hey Everyone,
Just a quick update.
I want to get the approval of the community as I want to provide the best service possible.
I feel embarrassed admitting my error but it is making knocking out these projects pretty difficult.
Originally all tiers except the top tier were supposed to have machine spun articles. This would have been much easier and made the turn around time easily attainable. But due to the typo of "handspun" for every tier on every project, I am having to hand spin 5 articles for each package c and have had 5 or 6 ordered in the last day or so.
This is alot of work for only one person and I don't trust outsourcing as quality would probably diminish.
I need to change the turn around time for all packages, which won't effect SEO anyhow as Grindstone says, it's inconsequential and quality takes time.
The New Turn Around Times Need To Be As Follows.
Package A 5-7 days
Package B 7-9 days
Package C 9-12 days.
I work tirelessly on weekends as well and if it is posible to finish a project before the time frame you better believe it'll be done and delivered.
I hope I'm not crucified for this but I'd rather maintain quality for those who want it.
Thanks everyone,
Feel free to let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
D
Just a quick update.
I want to get the approval of the community as I want to provide the best service possible.
I feel embarrassed admitting my error but it is making knocking out these projects pretty difficult.
Originally all tiers except the top tier were supposed to have machine spun articles. This would have been much easier and made the turn around time easily attainable. But due to the typo of "handspun" for every tier on every project, I am having to hand spin 5 articles for each package c and have had 5 or 6 ordered in the last day or so.
This is alot of work for only one person and I don't trust outsourcing as quality would probably diminish.
I need to change the turn around time for all packages, which won't effect SEO anyhow as Grindstone says, it's inconsequential and quality takes time.
The New Turn Around Times Need To Be As Follows.
Package A 5-7 days
Package B 7-9 days
Package C 9-12 days.
I work tirelessly on weekends as well and if it is posible to finish a project before the time frame you better believe it'll be done and delivered.
I hope I'm not crucified for this but I'd rather maintain quality for those who want it.
Thanks everyone,
Feel free to let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
D
hi,
for the web 2.0 properties, will they have the keyword included in the domain name?
for example, say it was wetpaint - would it be keyword.wetpaint.com or are you using a random username here?
I would prefer keyword in domain name.
Thanks in advance
for the web 2.0 properties, will they have the keyword included in the domain name?
for example, say it was wetpaint - would it be keyword.wetpaint.com or are you using a random username here?
I would prefer keyword in domain name.
Thanks in advance
- Status