indeed, the squeezes on the low volume stocks can be hard to stomach...IStay far away from the low volume ones
indeed, the squeezes on the low volume stocks can be hard to stomach...IStay far away from the low volume ones
+1, every time I think about learning to trade forex, I am like "well couldn't I write a bot to do it better than me?" But then, having no knowledge abouit the inner workings of forex or even what all the terms mean, so my bot would surely leave out some crucial details and bankrupt me, unless I first learn to trade forex by hand. Need to trade by hand to write the bot, want to write the bot so I never have to trade by hand. Chicken and egg problem?If I were to get into forex I'd do it by learning to create Neural Networks that can work with Forex, not actually learning Forex itself.
If I were to get into forex I'd do it by learning to create Neural Networks that can work with Forex, not actually learning Forex itself.
In a sense, there is no real zero sum anything then as someone is always making a fee/profit without the risk. With it being the same, then its all the same.. amiright?
The way I'm understanding zero sum is that "in order for me to win this game, there must be a loser" Which is why some people have an "ethics" problem with capitalism. Is this anywhere in the ballpark, mathmagicians?
I'd feel more confident sitting down at a blackjack table. You have to understand that I am not just your average blackjack player though.
It's not even the ethics of it for me - it's that mathematically if I stay in that game long enough, my profits will go to zero (less with commissions). Limit as it approaches infinity, just like how statistics say if I flip a coin 5 times, I might get 4 heads and 1 tails (so I've "won" 4 times), but if I keep doing it, it will always end up being 50/50
Unless you've got a strong counting method, you're subject to odds just like anyone else.
The way I'm understanding zero sum is that "in order for me to win this game, there must be a loser" Which is why some people have an "ethics" problem with capitalism. Is this anywhere in the ballpark, mathmagicians?
for wallstreet sharks it's a game with positive expectation, for housewife traders and coin-flippers - negative
You dont need be a wallstreet fuck to make money.
You just need to understand market microstructure and human behavior.
Markets are predictable under certain conditions. Its these conditions that give whoever it is the edge.
but you dont need be in wallstreet for that. In fact them fuckers are some of the worst fucking traders there are.
It means that if someone gains X then someone loses X. If someone loses Y, then someone gains Y.