Ya, either that or we're sick of being led around by fairy-believing faggots in public office. So we need to start changing some minds one way or another.
It's 2012, it's time for America to grow the fuck up.
I swear Atheist's today are a bunch of hipster faggots.
If you really are an atheist who gives a fuck what anyone else believes in. Putting these kind of billboards doesn't do shit. Just makes you look like a believer by saying "herp derp you're a loser if you don't believe in not believing in a god".
That being said, holding a position that there is no higher power, is still holding a position and giving a fuck about religion.
Do you have a point or are we just stating irrelevant facts?
Do you have a point or are we just stating irrelevant facts?
NopeHe is confusing atheism with agnosticism I think.
Ya, either that or we're sick of being led around by fairy-believing faggots in public office. So we need to start changing some minds one way or another.
It's 2012, it's time for America to grow the fuck up.
(Arrogant)Atheists <<<<<<<<Agnostic(Neutral)>>>>>>>>> Religious(Arrogant)
No one knows, and anyone making claims either way is arrogant in their beliefs.
Simple as that.
Only one small problem. Unless you can read minds you really don't know what someone else knows. So all you can really know is that you don't know.
However, *belief* IS ignorance since if you *knew* you would no longer *believe*.
So one can conclude that believers are ignorant. But one may not conclude that others don't *know* unless they are able to read minds.
That's exactly what I was going to say, you destroyed your own argument.
Don't need to read minds to know that.
No, you missed the point. YOU cannot conclude that someone else doesn't *know* because you can't read minds. You can only conclude that someone who *believes* is ignorant.
Only one small problem. Unless you can read minds you really don't know what someone else knows. So all you can really know is that you don't know.
However, *belief* IS ignorance since if you *knew* you would no longer *believe*.
So one can conclude that believers are ignorant. But one may not conclude that others don't *know* unless they are able to read minds.
No, you missed the point. YOU cannot conclude that someone else doesn't *know* because you can't read minds. You can only conclude that someone who *believes* is ignorant.
Sorry, that's wrong. Your tarrot card analogy is a distraction and is not what I am saying.
You can't read minds. Therefore you don't know what someone else knows.
anything that could make people think about how stupid and ancient that book people think was written by some god is fine by me. If its a billboard, an ad in the paper or a website, just get people to start thinking for themselves and free themselves from the chains of organized religions.
The only question I have is, "Is it possible to read minds, and are people who 'believe' ignorant?"