Athiesm vs Judaism

Status
Not open for further replies.
What the fuck has evolution got to do with being an atheist? Evolution is a scientific theory which 95% of the scientific community agree with, some of them religious. It has nothing to do with being an atheist, many atheists don't believe in evolution.
Is that a fact or are you just helping your self to the rest of the pie without proper information. Most scientists go with the flow - not to lose their job I'm sure.
Now heres a poll with something to back it up. Poll in 05 - 76% of doctors believe in God. I guess when you work with life its clear.
Survey: Most doctors believe in God, afterlife - Health care- msnbc.com
Now were in trouble we got close minded Doctors operating on us.

I'm sure what ever else you were asking is bunch of guessing crap also, its obvious.
 


Rusky, you are as retarded as always.

There's no need to find every fossile of every animal that ever lived. The millions already found are sufficient. The "missing link" is a straw man argument used by those who does not understand evolution or are in so much denial that they will use any argument against evolution to protect their worldview.
 
Imagine the process of evolution to the largest mammal in the world - Blue whale - and how many cycles did that take is the question if you know it all so well.

whaleevolution.gif


image010.jpg


HumpbackWhaleSkeleton.jpg


whale.jpg


forelimb%20homologies.jpg


VaQTkuvXL8YJvJzZpB.jpg


yeah yeah, should be workin. I'm refreshin stats.
 
Flagellum_base_diagram.png


Bacterial Flagellum

"The bacterial flagellum. The flagellum is an ion-powered rotary motor, anchored in the membranes surrounding the bacterial cell. This schematic diagram highlights the assembly process of the bacterial flagellar filament and the cap-filament complex."

Living cells are filled with complex structures whos detailed origins are unknown even to the all knowing evolutionists. Actually whats really unknown is the assembling of all these parts. Its like a high tech engine, working at very high RPM. Without one part present and working the whole system doesn't work. Like a watch, or a motor. For which we know intelligent design was present and required to work.
How do you explain something that cant possibility evolve over time but needs to be complete at all times to work?




Image86.jpg
 
Rusky, you are as retarded as always.

There's no need to find every fossile of every animal that ever lived. The millions already found are sufficient. The "missing link" is a straw man argument used by those who does not understand evolution or are in so much denial that they will use any argument against evolution to protect their worldview.

We do have a very impressive fossil record.

But and this is a big But.
This could have been a good one but it was fake. This one was recent.
BBC News | SCI/TECH | 'Piltdown' bird fake explained

Oldie but would have been something you would be shoving in my face right now if it was real.
Top 25 Crimes of the Century - The Fake Ape-Man - TIME
What the heck happened to all these ape like creatures anyways. No evidence at all. I mean with all the t-rex bones we find - not even one ape. Was there like 5 of them total or does it take millions of years for the evolutionary cycles to work.
 
yeah yeah, should be workin. I'm refreshin stats.

The reason I mentioned the whale is because its a mammal - originally a land walker. What do you have to do from an engineering point of view. To change a dog into an animal that spends most of its life in the open ocean and still retains its air breathing characteristics.
Now changing a bus into a submarine - we understand virtually everything has to be changed to adapt to the new environment. Because life on land and water are fundamentally very different. So we understand the enormous amount of changes that will need to be done, virtually everything. That is if you understand the complexity of a sub and how it works.

Now let do numbers - mathematically actually thinking about this; not looking at what your science teacher told you.
Skin, Breathing, a diving operator, eyes redesigned, hearing, sonar, feeding, so much more stuff - now what I'm asking for is how many cycles will this take. 10k, 50k, maybe millions of cycles and changes. What does this suggest we see in the focil record.
 
Rusky, you are as retarded as always.

There's no need to find every fossile of every animal that ever lived. The millions already found are sufficient. The "missing link" is a straw man argument used by those who does not understand evolution or are in so much denial that they will use any argument against evolution to protect their worldview.

Calling someone names that has a different set of beliefs is retarded. Don't be childish. Allow someone to see the world in a different way. Just because something is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT FOR "YOU" DOESN'T MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY "RIGHT"
 
Interesting.

I'm Jewish by birth and culture (Texan by choice). My rabbi - of course reformed - says that biblical Judiasm does not actually prohibit the belief in other gods. It just says... Thou Shalt Not Have Any Other Gods Before Me.

In biblical times, many Isrealites prayed to local Baals or dieties, but they were just considered lower than The Big Guy in The Sky.

that is sort of in response to Harvey J. You know - 2 Jews in a room, and 3 opinions.... is more of a reality.
 
Calling someone names that has a different set of beliefs is retarded.

It isn't if it's true. Plus, i called him a retard for using fallacies when arguing against evolution.

Don't be childish.

I'm certainly not childish. Blindly believing something without evidence or logical support however, is.

Allow someone to see the world in a different way.

I do, if it makes rational sense or if they have something to support their view.

Just because something is ABSOLUTELY RIGHT FOR "YOU" DOESN'T MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY "RIGHT"

I agree. I, however, do not claim to be "absolutely right".
 
It isn't if it's true. Plus, i called him a retard for using fallacies when arguing against evolution.



I'm certainly not childish. Blindly believing something without evidence or logical support however, is.



I do, if it makes rational sense or if they have something to support their view.



I agree. I, however, do not claim to be "absolutely right".


um, okay...
 
Just out of interest Rusky, how old do you think the Earth is?

The big fairy (god, not Rusky) doesn't say. It only took 7 days to make though so in god years (much like dog years) it could very well be less than 10 thousand years old.
 
The big fairy (god, not Rusky) doesn't say. It only took 7 days to make though so in god years (much like dog years) it could very well be less than 10 thousand years old.

Well, we usually explain away uncomfortable facts like that by saying that god years are longer than solar years, so god days last a long time....so that would be different than dog years. :)

Anyway, people get comfort from tradition, and it is helpful to raise a child with an identity for some of us. We can be agnostics, realists, scientists, whatever....and in the end my people are still Jews..... I can raise my kids to believe in The Great Pumpkin, but the world will still view them as Jews.

A few years ago, my son came home and told me he did not believe in God, and I said that was fine, but he was still going to have a Bar Mitzvah. He survived the ordeal, had a nice party, and really doesn't regret it. He may make a different decision when he has kids, and that's ok too. (lol - I say that now, but I'm sure I'll pout and whine about it)

If some of you are strong enough to break away from all that, you may be more evolved. Who is to say?

...Imagine there's no heaven... (I always liked that song).

It isn't about being right...but being right for you without stepping on other people's toes.
 
bitsdawg: Yeah, I always love to throw that in the face of the Lubovichia... freaky Amish wannabes trying to out religious everyone else like they're from Westboro or some shit.
So how are you going with your Elder Protocols? I've nearly got gentiles believing in evolution with "scientific" "evidence", so they'll go to hell when they die... :D

Present to us a single transitional fossil and I will believe in this thing that you call evolution.
Paranthropus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Australopithecus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The genus Australopithecus is closely related to the human genus homo, and may be ancestral to it.
(Emphasis added)

Just because they didn't have the pieces of the puzzle in Darwin's day, doesn't mean haven't come a long way in 150 years (and seeing as it was first published in 1859, happy 150th birthday [/i]On the Origin of Species[/i]!)

Rusky: Reptiles don't have the code for feathers, but a lot of birds do have the codes for scales. That's like saying a Voodoo2 video card doesn't have the capacity to do Textured Light & Shading. Of course it doesn't! It's a precursor.
It should also be noted that feathers are not derived from scales, but rather from scutes. If you had an education in biology or had done in-depth (as in more than Google... this requires reading scientific journals if you're not a bird enthusiast), you'd know this. I'm not calling you an idiot or anything here. This really isn't common knowledge. A bit of searching came up with this good explanation of how bird scutes turn into feathers: Feathers, scutes and the origin of birds

Finally Richard Dawkins is about as representative of Atheists as Al Sharpton is of Black people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.