Well, what did everyone expect when running front-ends saying "Auto Insurance From $9"? You give shit, you get shit. The leads are weak? You're... wait, in this case, the leads were weak. Surehits has worked with the other model for years without issue...Well as always there's more to the story.
So 90% of these were just backed out with Surehits cpc feeds.
Surehits changed there click scoring algorithm around 3-4 weeks ago. Before it was click to lead fill was how they rated the quality of the click.
Now they're doing click to contract as the scoring algorithm.
As a result from what I hear click prices have dropped from 10$ per click to 2$. Hence everything going to shit![]()
Well as always there's more to the story.
So 90% of these were just backed out with Surehits cpc feeds.
Surehits changed there click scoring algorithm around 3-4 weeks ago. Before it was click to lead fill was how they rated the quality of the click.
Now they're doing click to contract as the scoring algorithm.
As a result from what I hear click prices have dropped from 10$ per click to 2$. Hence everything going to shit![]()
Well, what did everyone expect when running front-ends saying "Auto Insurance From $9"? You give shit, you get shit. The leads are weak? You're... wait, in this case, the leads were weak. Surehits has worked with the other model for years without issue...
Well, what did everyone expect when running front-ends saying "Auto Insurance From $9"? You give shit, you get shit. The leads are weak? You're... wait, in this case, the leads were weak. Surehits has worked with the other model for years without issue...
On the other hand, the traffic we see from organic, ppc, and similar sources is much higher quality because of the intent behind the search. These people are actively looking for car insurance and are ready to buy if they find the right deal.
Well, what did everyone expect when running front-ends saying "Auto Insurance From $9"? You give shit, you get shit. The leads are weak? You're... wait, in this case, the leads were weak. Surehits has worked with the other model for years without issue...
Hit up Eli, i remember AboveAllOffers may have some of them
Misleading ad copy is a big part of the problem, but the larger issue is customer intent.
When someone is surfing tmz, facebook, or similar sites, they are not actively looking for car insurance (usually). Your ads might catch their attention, get them to enter their zip, and even get them to complete the quote. However, most of the time those people are not going to buy a policy on the spot, since they are more in a browsing mode.
On the other hand, the traffic we see from organic, ppc, and similar sources is much higher quality because of the intent behind the search. These people are actively looking for car insurance and are ready to buy if they find the right deal.
I have many publishers that are still making $12+ per click and some that are doing high $X,XXX per day or even more. The model is not flawed, your traffic just needs to be more targeted to customers with higher intent.![]()
he saod $X.XXX per day even MORE. so yeah...theres your answer.Sean, you are correct. Your new model is not flawed, and it respects and rewards higher quality traffic sources as it should. We're one of the advertisers that saw a large boost to quality score and CPC rates.
However what i'm wondering here is, do you guys cap total earnings for certain publishers per day ?
And do you have any publishers doing over "$X,XXX" per day ??
no shit sherlock.