Where did you get this understanding from?If so, from my understanding, FRL accounts for approx 93% of our currency supply whereas straight Fed monetization (ex: QE) accounts for the other 7%.
hes just confused about currencies, stocks, bitcoin that is somehow in between and his mind cant comprehend it, and other financial instruments. mix in some ideology about what should and shouldnt be and you get such a mangled statement.
Where did you get this understanding from?
The Yuan is pegged (with allowable drift around the CPR) to these currencies to keep the value of the Yuan artificially low, facilitating low relative costs of Chinese goods and maintaining the trade surplus that China enjoys. The US and other major trade partners of China have been advocating a looser trade band for years for exactly this reason. The PBOC has argued against a looser trading band due to added costs for Chinese businesses and destabilization of their BoP resulting from potentially dramatic volatility in exchange rate; they are concerned with deflation as they should be. If somehow the USD and Euro experience hyperinflation, which is not going to happen anytime soon, the PBOC immediately removing or significantly decreasing the CPR would be incredibly dangerous for their economy as it could easily both decrease domestic prices and drastically increase relative export costs. Meanwhile their trillions in USD reserves and debt held would be devalued even further as a result. The Chinese do not and should not want extreme appreciation of their currency against the currencies of their major trading partners.
Professional fund managers who handle billions of dollars in wealth don't believe this is inevitable or even likely in the short term. These are people with skin in the game, who are very keen to watch for this sort of catastrophic event.
And so I think it is most likely, that if the USD survived the end of Bretton Woods, and Ron Paul freaking out in the 1970s, until now, there is a pretty good chance that the dollar will last another 40 years (Lindy Effects).
I feel like I have wasted thousands of posts made on this forum if this is where we are today.
Carry on lads.
If you take illegal trade out of the equation then Bitcoin would be on very shaky ground. There would be no good reason to turn your hard earned $ into BTC, to purchase an iPhone on Ebay for example.
If by way of a miracle Ebay announced tomorrow that they were going to start accepting Bitcoin, again please provide a valid reasoning as to why you would spend your Bitcoin over spending your $.
If you are willing to accept the predicament then how would this ever be overcome?
many people are scared to use it when there's more work required to keep it secure, there's no way to insure it, etc.
I think your compass is a little bit off here. It's the exchanges that get hammered, not small bizzes... Not enough money it it to do so.Right now, you can't just throw up a Bitcoin related site, same as you would a standard eCommerce site that accepts PayPal / Stripe, or whatever. Hackers are relentless with Bitcoin sites, and they pounded with thousands of requests/hour, etc. It's takes quite a bit more to keep the hackers at bay, and isn't something Jane who sells candles and teddy bears online is going to want to deal with.
I'll agree to this point, but bitcoin is bigger than anarchism. Lots of fools just want a better payment system, and even more people (half of china in fact) want gold 2.0. We true believers in it want it for anarchy, but it'll take more infrastructure than just the financial network to deliver that.Now, I totally believe you can have anarchism (and it will be darker and harder than people expect) but you need the ecosystem in place. Bitcoin is a second order good in a sense. You can't change the money until you have the social systems in place to do business in Bitcoin, to regulate and approve BTC institutions etc.
And destroy bitcoin's fungibility? Fuckabunchathat.In fact, if you wanted to do something really radical, you'd start a Bitcoin private regulator. You'd require BTC businesses to document their security practices, to publish their books, etc. Everything would be transparent. BTC institutions would need reserves, and insurance on deposits etc. You could certify them, arbitrate disputes etc.
So 100 days while travelling the planet wasn't enough for you?It's so early in this BTC thing. It's a speculative mania right now. There is no one, 4 years in, who can live 100% with only Bitcoin direct transactions.
No state with a central bank will ever allow this but this fact just makes it much, much more likely that the anarchist societies get created. I'm almost happy about this in fact.And there probably never will be until Bitcoin becomes legal tender for the purpose of paying tax debts.
I think your compass is a little bit off here. It's the exchanges that get hammered, not small bizzes... Not enough money it it to do so.
Bitcoin is not gold.Lots of fools just want a better payment system, and even more people (half of china in fact) want gold 2.0.
Are you a programmer? Because if you're not, you're no cypherpunk.We're getting there day by day and I'm quite sure I'll live to see it all implemented.
That word doesn't mean what you think it means. You should avoid using big words you don't understand.And destroy bitcoin's fungibility? Fuckabunchathat.
Ah yes, threaten physical violence for someone engaging in a peaceful voluntary activity.Anyone who tries to destroy bitcoin's fungibility and therefore hurt bitcoin will be an easy target for everyone with black market access to illegal weapons to do some target practice on.
Yeah, if you don't count the main thing, then like, everything else is totally wonderful.If you don't count taxes living on bitcoin in any big city is now a reality. For criminies' sake, there are even subway restaurants that take bitcoin now!
I am basically reading your posts just to see what sort of crazy stuff you will post next.I know, I know, the common man on the street won't give a shit and can still live happily on fiat alone... But every day I see new apps and services that REQUIRE bitcoin to be used... All it will take is for one of them to really catch on, like facebook did for instance, and suddenly everyone will suddenly go out and get some bitcoin for that purpose.
It's inevitable. It's only a matter of time until the sheeple realize it or we get guns and coerce them to accept the new Chinese Gold 2.0.no typical merchant is going to go through all this just so they can trade in Bitcoin.