Boston bomber - celebrity rockstar.

clucas

New member
Nov 19, 2012
162
4
0
There was a time the cover of the Rolling Stones magazine was reserved for true celebrities in the music industry. Those that had payed their dues. Those worthy of the highest accolades.
But alas, no more.
Is this just great marketing, glorifying terrorism or just an absolute outrage?
Discuss.

GCPHdCS.jpg
 


There was a time the cover of the Rolling Stones magazine was reserved for true celebrities in the music industry. Those that had payed their dues. Those worthy of the highest accolades.
But alas, no more.
Is this just great marketing, glorifying terrorism or just an absolute outrage?
Discuss.

GCPHdCS.jpg

i did not read the article so i will not judge it but i can see why people are angry as rolling stone presents him as jim morrison him however rolling stone did not take the photo it was a photo the young man took of himself prior to the bombings. one thing i have to say is this. the man has not been tried yet. i would like to know the whole truth before we convict him or demonize him without a trial. it s the same idea how people demonized george zimmerman before there was even a trial and how many continue to demonize him after the trial. we should believe and uphold the idea innocent until proven guilty. i know he has had a confession but i would like to know the details first and understand this whole thing
 
This dude rocked the cover 43 years ago.

22516_lg.jpg


Not sure what the big deal is. The new issue calls the guy a monster right on the cover. I'm getting pretty sick of all this pussy assed political correct bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greenleaves
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJu6Up9w2Hc]Dr Hook Cover Of The Rolling Stone - YouTube[/ame]
 
Where did 2 poor ass kids get grenades and why did they flee in a car after not actually being caught, randomly rob a convenience store then through said grenades at police in an epic GTA style car chase.
Dunno. And why would someone bomb a marathon?

Meanwhile he was caught on tape at the site of detonation and was IDd by eyewitnesses and there's about 7 other metric shit tons of evidence.

Are you fucking his mother or something?
 
There was a time the cover of the Rolling Stones magazine was reserved for true celebrities in the music industry. Those that had payed their dues. Those worthy of the highest accolades.

51YY2EJKRJL.jpg


o_iidFk1T1r16j324.jpg


rolling-stone-678-beavis-butt-head-danzig-2f7a.jpg


blast_off_jersey_shore_star_snooki_appears_on_the_cover_of_rolling_stone.sjpg_400_1000_0_85_1_50_50.jpg



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJJu4GtopZY]what-have-you-done-for-me-lately.mp4 - YouTube[/ame]
 
who gives a flying fuck about a magazine in 2013?

That piece of shit probably consists of poorly written hype articles and a bunch of "Top 10" lists

Top 10 tambourine players from the 70s
Top 5 unplugged albums of the mid 90s
Top 7 videos that contain full frontal nudity

DIAF
 
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
 

Hello 17 year old God of SEO.

The grenades were described as "crude grenades." According to various media sources, a person doesn't exactly have to be a genius to create those or pressure cooker bombs.

The official story is that they did NOT rob a convenience store, though I'm not sure what it would mean if they had.

Just because someone is seen at a marathon with a backpack (they don't have any evidence of him actually saying he did it and his facebook was "they set me up" which ever so proficiently got deleted when Facebook received a takedown from the US Gov.

Beyond the easily hoaxed supposed Facebook message itself, what is the evidence for it being real? For example, are there any interviews with friends or relatives confirming that they saw the message on his actual facebook, if he had one? A google search shows that even people at a conspiracy forum quickly decided that is was probably fake.
 
I'm getting pretty sick of all this pussy assed political correct bullshit.

The victim's families of glorified killers probably are too. I'm all for political incorrectness, it's where I get most of my lols from and I'm all for a killer cover on a magazine when it doesn't involve a real killer, but I'm dead against gutter marketing as a means of generating attention and outrage just to increase awareness of the product (which may not necessarily increase sales) when the famalies and loved ones of those killed are probably still mourning.

N35yVcQ.jpg
 
i did not read the article so i will not judge it but i can see why people are angry as rolling stone presents him as jim morrison him however rolling stone did not take the photo it was a photo the young man took of himself prior to the bombings. one thing i have to say is this. the man has not been tried yet. i would like to know the whole truth before we convict him or demonize him without a trial. it s the same idea how people demonized george zimmerman before there was even a trial and how many continue to demonize him after the trial. we should believe and uphold the idea innocent until proven guilty. i know he has had a confession but i would like to know the details first and understand this whole thing

Do you even shift-key, Bro?