Busted! Ron Paul racist rant caught on tape!

[lukep]

And this statement in its self wasn't racist? I die a little inside for the white race everytime I see forced integration.

Somewhat off topic, how do you feel about the inevitable day when cross-breeding has made all of humanity the same color? I've heard it said it could happen in as little as 5 generations from the invention of the internet and dating sites.

The masses did not vote for this goon. Voting exists to give the masses an illusion of having self-worth. The ability to think they have a voice in our government. Did you really think he was voted in by the masses? LuL

The masses seem to believe the hype they are fed by the MSM. So possibly, yeah, I do believe that the MSM & the television in general convinced enough voters to go to the polls and overpower the traditional voters who voted for McCain. As a marketer you can't rule this possibility out.

Ron Paul keeps winning all these polls, if he loses the election itll further prove my theory on the voting system. However and if he wins, war will be inevitable which is something I look forward too.

WTF? What kind of war are you looking forward to?

A war where a militarized OWS attacks the governments of its home nations?

A war where Iran hurled the first nuke at Jerusalem? (WWIII)

A war where the mourners of RP (post assassination) rise up and overthrow the republic?

Or just a war where the libertarians get tired of Congress blocking everything RP is trying to achieve and rise up to overthrow them?

No existing model of warfare such as civil war or war between nations fits the need.

 

[Yaxxx]

WTF? What kind of war are you looking forward to?

Pretty sure he just wants to put his retarded ghillie suit to good use.

 

[paulieg]

Wait, so you're an anarchist and you're complaining that "libertarians can't see past their dogma to answer valid critiques of their ideology"?

lollercopters

yes and i'm not sure why you find that so funny. if you exclude the majority of insurrectionist anarchists who just like to set shit on fire and a good fight in general, there is a very healthy amount of discourse and argument among us with few to no appeals to dogma - the debates i've had as a free market anarchist with platformists from cnt/fai for example have been epic. being an anarchist means constantly challenging your own assumptions and views - marxists don't have a monopoly on dialectics, you know

i'll be happy to answer any critique of my ideology and i readily admit that there just aren't any simple answers in many cases (and none at all in some), which i've yet to see the vast majority of randroids do. mind you, i've got a lot of sympathy for libertarians (both the classic and the american kind - you folks really need to stop relabelling things to keep down the amount of confision) - both strains of thought come from some of the same beginnings, you lot just got lost on the way and made a few wrong turns

-p

 

[bizzle]

Cuz Obama promised hope and change and no wars (bullshit). However Paul wasn't on the map.

Obama only killed that Bin Laden guy, brought the troops home, thus cleaning up Jr's 10 year old mess.

But to comment on the video, I agree with Paul. Major legal reform needs to happen with the drug laws.

 

[bizzle]

actually you can be black and latino, although common lexicon doesn't regard brazaillians as latino, tehy actually are and brazil has a lot of people who you would describe as black, but brazil is such a meltin pot, that everyone is mixed, there is no purebreed white or black.

In america, If you half black half white, you're still regarded as black, maybe even if you're 1/4 black you will still be regarded as black

But "black" isn't really used in brazil much.

Secondly there are lots of hispanics who are black, cuba comes to mind, and also peurto rico has a lot of black people.

Latin = culture, black = race, you can be both.

Last no matter how well your accents are if you're bilingual and fluent in both languages and where there are common words in both languages (latino, burrito, enchalda etc), the accent of your mother tongue or most practiced language will take precendence.

Chances are the guy probably speaks a lot of spanish and uses the word "latino" more often than in English, so you can't really have two accents for the same word, it's difficult for the mind to natually do that, unless you fight it and make a conscious effort to adopt two accents for the same word.

Black is not a race. Its a term that was created to strip West African slaves of their original nationalities.

In Brazil you have Afro-Brazilians. In America you have African Americans, in the Caribbean Afro-Caribbeans and etc. etc. all descendents of displaced West Africans. The term "black" completely strips and has stripped descendents of West African slaves of their actual nationality and shouldn't really be used.

 

[Rexibit]

Black is not a race. Its a term that was created to strip West African slaves of their original nationalities.

In Brazil you have Afro-Brazilians. In America you have African Americans, in the Caribbean Afro-Caribbeans and etc. etc. all descendents of displaced West Africans. The term "black" completely strips and has stripped descendents of West African slaves of their actual nationality and shouldn't really be used.

Black can be used to refer to a number of things: skin color, demographic, race, etc., it just depends on the context of the person's comments.

There have been "black" people in other places than just West Africa. Everyone started out brown/black in the area around Babylon (current oldest archaeological fossils) and moved in different directions. The further they got from the equator and direct sunlight, the lighter their pigment became.

 

[lukep]

And what the fuck is the point trying to convince anyone that we shouldn't use one name to use in place of a large number of unknown names?

Next are you going to require us to learn all of the Native American Tribes' name and how to differentiate between them so we don't have to call them all native Americans?

I don't usually argue in favor of less learning, but in this instance the whole world simply will laugh at you for even thinking in that direction.

 

[bizzle]

And what the fuck is the point trying to convince anyone that we shouldn't use one name to use in place of a large number of unknown names?

Next are you going to require us to learn all of the Native American Tribes' name and how to differentiate between them so we don't have to call them all native Americans?

I don't usually argue in favor of less learning, but in this instance the whole world simply will laugh at you for even thinking in that direction.

How hard is it to say the word African American or Afro Brazilian instead of black? You may have a point that black is just easier.

Its not offensive, it just would be nice if we got rid of some of these huge blanket terms.

 

[dreamache]

How hard is it to say the word African American or Afro Brazilian instead of black? You may have a point that black is just easier.

Its not offensive, it just would be nice if we got rid of some of these huge blanket terms.

I've had this mp3 file hosted on my site for years to post in times like these... It's George Carlin..

http://66.197.63.28/racial.mp3

 

[megatabbers]

How hard is it to say the word African American or Afro Brazilian instead of black? You may have a point that black is just easier.

Not hard at all. But then, we should be calling whites Caucasian Americans which IMHO sounds ridiculous no matter how PC it is.

 

[paulieg]

Black is not a race. Its a term that was created to strip West African slaves of their original nationalities.

In Brazil you have Afro-Brazilians. In America you have African Americans, in the Caribbean Afro-Caribbeans and etc. etc. all descendents of displaced West Africans. The term "black" completely strips and has stripped descendents of West African slaves of their actual nationality and shouldn't really be used.

the concept of 'nationality' did not exist in the way we think of it today at the time - ethnicity/blood ties and culture certainly, but not nationality. This is why some african hegemons were enthusiastic participants in the slave trade as sellers - they saw nothing wrong with selling their subjects, since they weren't members of the in-group, in other words they didn't consider them 'fellow countrymen'. nationalism is a relatively recent phenomenon that has outlived its usefulness (if there ever was one) - now we just need to wait for the younger nations to catch up

-p

 

[paulieg]

Not hard at all. But then, we should be calling whites Caucasian Americans which IMHO sounds ridiculous no matter how PC it is.

erm. this 'caucasian' nonsense has to stop. have you ever *seen* people who live in the caucasus region? from azerbaijan to georgia, none are particularly light. russians call them black.

beyond that, why do we care about skin pigment related labels again? racial groups happen to correlate with culture and class in the US and a few other places, but it's counterproductive to conflate them.

-p