Diorex is Down for Good?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who is your target market?
December 16, 2006
We recently started a new campaign and we came out of the box with higher traffic and higher conversion rates than expected.

Our partner was thrilled, we were blowing away the aggressive volume goals we set.

Then they came to us and said something along the lines of : “our legal team needs your to make a few changes”…This is usually the kiss of death.

In this case, there was a mixture of legal needed changes and some from people just thinking that this change would be much better. But it was presented as these changes need to be made.

They did not want us to accentuate the free offer quite so prominently.
They thought the page was too busy.
They were afraid the customer would be so engrossed in our content that they would fail to click order now.
Then there were the actual legal changes we needed to be made

Unfortunately our web master read this as “these changes need to be made right away”.

It is important that you measure the results of everything you test and to make gradual changes. As a result of the huge list of requested and required changes our CR plummetted.

Turns out, that everything except a single line in our fine print was not necessary to change, and was just a suggestion.

Rather than add everything back in at once, we made changes one at a time. What we learned by doing this is what was negative and what was positive and what did not matter.

In our case, they actually made a few suggestions that added a few percentage points to the CR. They also had a few horrible ideas that really hurt. The only required change had virtually no impact.

Moral of this story - you are not your target market. Just because you love (or hate) an idea does not mean everyone else will.

The eventual result is that our ultimate conversion rate was even better than before because we were ‘forced’ to make changes we would not have made on our own.
 


Google Juice from Google Docs
January 28, 2007
Seems like Google is treating Google.com as a pretty trusted source. I recently found quite a few first page natural results on Google for spam pages that were hosted within the domain, docs.google.com. All of which were little more than spam pages that would have worked really well in 1996 search engines if they only would have had a page counter and some flashing graphics.

http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dgmxv75r_7gbcntq Shows for me as the 3rd listing on what should be a competitive term. It shows before every major Auto Loan company in this country. The page is a piece of junk to be nice.

Seems like that should be easy to fix, remove the juice from docs.google.com.

My general satisfaction with Google results has deteriorated significantly over the last 6 months. I am just about at the point I was at in 1999 when I first heard of Google. Is the market ripe once again for 2 smart kids from Stanford with a better way to rank search results?
 
Ok that's all I've got on hand right now. To be clear the above posts were all authored by Diorex and originally found at Protected Blog Login « WordPress.com

A few things:
- Nothing is cached at archive.org anymore. Is this normal? That's where I ripped a good bit of it a while back.
- A number of pages I got just had the first few paragraphs of posts, nothing after the jump. The full-length post pages weren't cached in google or the archive.org, so a number of good ones missed out on.
- I had at least 5-10 more posts saved in furl.net but the saved copies of those have disappeared as well. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: emp
If you prefer reading offline here are the docs. By the way thanks for the info. I saw the option to save the info back in December through the waybackmachine but never saved the info because I just figured it would always be open. Guess Not

RapidShare: 1-Click Webhosting
 
Brooklyn Blue and Wicked Fire Forum, you guys are so refreshing...

Fuck Yeah!

Had to brand myself there..haha

Thanks for the info
 
Status
Not open for further replies.