If you're victim #8, you suck at life.
Not in the US.привет;1829661 said:Correct. However excessive this was, the person is in his rights to do so.
Assumption.привет;1829661 said:Without a doubt there would be a "do not trespass" sign displayed on the entrance of the property.
No mention of made of any violation or damage to the man's home or property, so incorrect.привет;1829661 said:Thus little respect was given to this mans property and rights.
Greedy for doing his job? Assumption.привет;1829661 said:And a greedy solicitor paid the price.
I take it you lived through those times? No? Assumption.привет;1829661 said:This would never have happened in feudal Japan for example.
You clearly need to work on your historical knowledge of Japan, neither of these statements are correct.привет;1829661 said:Because everyone was aware that people were armed, and thus immense respect was given to peoples property and rights.
Assumption.привет;1829661 said:Bleeding hearts need not reply, thousands of children die each day, and you don't give a fuck about it.
Sure is, but walking up to a house and knocking on the door is not trespassing. Point of fact, in many jurisdictions, I can enter an unlocked home without trespassing.привет;1829772 said:Trespassing is a criminal offense, by doing so the person trespassing has put you and your family at risk.
Signs do not make it illegal to knock on a door. A sidewalk or a driveway leading to a home create an easement. In addition a barrier must typically exist in order to mark the boundaries. Even in Florida, you are not legally allowed to remove someone from property or outbuildings with force.привет;1829772 said:I have read a few articles where it states that he had three no trespassing signs on the property, I would post a link but I don't have enough posts
привет;1829772 said:Doesn't need to be. Essentially what you're saying is; You have to stab me first before I can defend myself.
Of course it's an assumption, but there is evidence that backs up my assumption.
So there is no value in reading history books?
Please tell me why people were not respectful in Japan (one of the most respectful countries in the world today) during feudal times, where a Samurai was in his rights to cut off someones head because they didn't deem someone as being respectful to them.
Then go to Africa and help them out. You wont, instead you'll reply to this.
i think they need to add some mental testing to owning a gun... b/c obviously these fucks are crazy... they are not criminals... just mentally unstable
criminals still gonna get guns illegally but... crazies have no business with guns
Yes because someone slicing you into pieces is so much better than getting shot.
I'll rather have a gun to defend myself. Can you picture your grandma defending herself with a knife against a knife? I definitely could picture mine defending herself with a gun. It's a big equalizer.
i think they need to add some mental testing to owning a gun... b/c obviously these fucks are crazy... they are not criminals... just mentally unstable
criminals still gonna get guns illegally but... crazies have no business with guns...
inb4 what defines crazy... i'll define it... this article - shooting everyone seeing batman because you like superman - shooting up a place of worship b/c you do not agree with them