Fox News Lies Again...

UnripeArbiter - honestly, I don't have time to read all your posts, how is it you find time to write all that shit?

Go back to makin' some money

Agreed, however I only care if the individuals I'm addressing these posts to are the ones reading them. Which they are, trust me.

I've already stated somewheres that I don't work I automate.

It frees my time. So then I can free those minds.

JK, but seriously. People need to automate at every corner that's all I can say.

Aside from that bullshit I just said, I really do need to work more.

I've taken a well deserved (hopefully brief) hiatus lately.

Thanks for the concern. :)
 


We have seen the religion of unbelief in America literally elaborated into a system and applied in a wholesale social experiment. We are seeing every societal institution: Church, state, family, economy, morality, welfare being targeted for comprehensive reconstruction on humanist foundations, in a utopian crusade toward the final emancipation and salvation of mankind.

The state born of unbelief is omnipotent, omnipresent, meddlesome, centralized, and bureaucratic. It has to be this way because it’s got a huge job to do. You see, in the absence of God, the state must become God. The state must fill in as supreme judge, lawgiver and king, as provider, as comforter of the afflicted; and without Jesus Christ, the state must become the “savior” of mankind. The state born of unbelief cannot be regulated, amended, voted or vetoed out of existence. Political revisions are temporary and meaningless because it springs from an underlying religious belief system and worldview. Conventional political action is futile so long as the ideas of unbelief remain lodged in the machinery of public policy.

Political conservatism has always lacked the backbone and vision to offer a clear and organized alternative. In futility, it has sought to bring political and social change without Christ or the Bible, thus seeking to treat the symptoms of the humanist/socialist state without providing a remedy for its underlying causes.
 
The reason you two are even having this discussion is the same thing I've been saying all along; atheism is nothing more than religion bashing. It isn't a positive belief; it's a negative belief. It doesn't believe anything; it disbelieves something. It doesn't add anything; it takes away from something else.

This is why I call it a parasitical ideology; without religion, atheism wouldn't exist because they basically don't do anything but talk about how bad religion is and how they're wrong and blah blah blah.

This is why you can't separate the two; they're one and the same. I don't particularly care, but nobody can pretend to be surprised when atheists end up bashing religion. It's basically all they do. I find it rather boring, actually.

I would love to not debate people about this, however the religious in the world just walk over everything with there beliefs in lots of different ways. If atheists don't stand up to them then things will never change.
 
I haven't even read this entire thread. But that statement is WRONG.

You have used 'your' in the wrong spot more than once, I just didn't want to be a prick and call it out.

The only childish one here is you.

It's still a typo....

I'm still aware of the difference....

and it's still childish to point at typos.....

even more childish to point it out twice....

-----

you didn't want to call it out because it would be childish. You're childish.
 
Unripe clearly has way too much time to "debate" this with "us", damn dude you type way too much.

By the way I think it's hilarious how you keep trying to refer to your arguments by saying "we believe, we disagree". Who is on your side? Who is here taking your back? There is no "we", this is "you". Nobody would be stupid enough to take your side after the idiocy you've displayed.

I mean really, it looks like you either have a mental disorder, or smoke too much pot and are lost in your own mind.

You're much too concerned with everybody arguing personal beliefs (and for that matter, hating all theists). Shit man, you are TERRIBLE at arguing. I agree with finding an atheist forum, that or just start your own forum and talk to yourself - you seem to be good at it.
 
Your an internet idiot so I dont have nothing to prove to you. It was part of the training I recieved in the military. If you had some kind of knowledge, outside of the shit your professors gave to you in college, you would understand.

Have you ever seen a friend die a horrible death right in front of your eyes?, have you experienced your child being born right in front you? Do you pay more in taxes than most people earn a year? Do you give more to charities than some make in a year? Have you killed a man? Have you ran a real business and put Americans to work? Are you responsible for raising a decent human being?

I thought so. I once was a ignorant liberal like yourself. Then I experienced life outside of the class room. The theorys my profs pounded in my head, turned out to be a bunched of theorys and thats all. They really didnt apply to the real world. Come back and preach to me when you really have lived a life.


spoon proof or you're a liar.
 
you didn't want to call it out because it would be childish.

Says who? YOU.

Stop trying to put words into my mouth, once again (damn, I get repetitive with you don't I).

I didn't want to be a prick. But since you had to try and recover from another losing argument, it is clear you have a hard time using the proper words in the proper places. I have multiple examples of you using 'your' improperly. What do you have?
 
Says who? YOU.

Stop trying to put words into my mouth, once again (damn, I get repetitive with you don't I).

I didn't want to be a prick. But since you had to try and recover from another losing argument, it is clear you have a hard time using the proper words in the proper places. I have multiple examples of you using 'your' improperly. What do you have?

:sighs:

You say you didn't want to be a prick by calling it out.

Yes, it would be "prickish" and childish. (it is childish, seriously... to point out typos is lame as fuck)

Do you seriously think that I haven't yet learned in life the difference between your and you're?

You're truly living in a fantasy world.
 
Do you seriously think that I haven't yet learned in life the difference between your and you're?

I would consider multiple "typos" on a single common word to be an error in using the word. You learned the difference I'm sure, you just have trouble using it (as noted by your multiple "typos").