Fuck the Liberal Media

You are picking a fight with the media because a candidate doesn't seem to understand the first amendment? (or the 14th amendment and 16th amendment). Come on now.
 


/ oil on fire = on

The Founding Fathers of America were obviously a bunch of moral degenerates who spurned the loving comfort of the British Empire and set out on a path of decay and corruption.

Unlike us Canadians who have kept our moral virtue and are above such despicable rhetoric.

/ oil on fire = off
 
i cant believe this bitch gets any airtime.

She needs air time with real questions like this so people can actually find out what a dipshit she is and how dangerous she could be.

Unfortunately the original Libertarian Tea Party movement, that would rightly be for the separation for church and state, has been replaced by far-right theocratic republicans looking for a new party after G.W Bush took a shit on the "Republican" brand. Its a shame.
 
She needs air time with real questions like this so people can actually find out what a dipshit she is and how dangerous she could be.

Unfortunately the original Libertarian Tea Party movement, that would rightly be for the separation for church and state, has been replaced by far-right theocratic republicans looking for a new party after G.W Bush took a shit on the "Republican" brand. Its a shame.

THIS.
 
Nope, I prefer a government that follows the first amendment or something like it.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The more religious Americans want to make our government the more freedom they'd take away from all of us. Many thoughtful Christians feel the same way.

Then why specify "Christian Theocracies", why not just say "Theocracies"?
 
She needs air time with real questions like this so people can actually find out what a dipshit she is and how dangerous she could be.

Unfortunately the original Libertarian Tea Party movement, that would rightly be for the separation for church and state, has been replaced by far-right theocratic republicans looking for a new party after G.W Bush took a shit on the "Republican" brand. Its a shame.

A total fucking shame. I've said it before and I'll say it again...The "tea party movement" set the Libertarian cause back by at least 20 years.
 
These teabaggers are a bunch of crazy motherfuckers


christine_witch.jpg
 
Why do some people insist on supporting these ignorant bitches that have basically proven over and over that they don't know shit about anything. (I'm obviously speaking about O'Donnell and Palin.)

Quote from the article: "O'Donnell upset Delaware's Republican establishment last month with her victory in the primary, and former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove has predicted she will cost the party a Senate seat"

Probable quote from a few years ago: "Palin upset the Republican establishment last month with her VP nomination, and former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove has predicted she will cost the party a Presidency "


Thank you, I don't understand it either. Even SC has it's own version, Nikki Haley, a woman that given the chance would no doubt strut her way into Washington and act a fool.
 
Even SC has it's own version, Nikki Haley, a woman that given the chance would no doubt strut her way into Washington and act a fool.

What's your grounds on this statement? I've not seen anything about her that separates her from any other average politician. Palin and O donnell are idiots riding some teabagger wave but I want to caution people about dismissing women in politics in general just because of a few bad apples. If we dismissed all the male counterparts of the two, we would have some major vacancies in our electoral system.
 
I'm wondering what qualifies her for the senate, as she seems to get by on charm and wackiness. Has she ever done anything noteworthy in life, aside from making controversial statements?

(And I'm not interested in anybody's rant about Obama's "lack" of qualifications for the presidency, as he was a senator, a law professor and civil rights attorney."
 
i cant believe this bitch gets any airtime.

What - you wouldn't hit that?

Thank you, I don't understand it either. Even SC has it's own version, Nikki Haley, a woman that given the chance would no doubt strut her way into Washington and act a fool.

What's wrong with her? I don't stay on top of SC politics, but she doesn't seem to be cut from the same cloth as Palin and O'Donnell. We might even see the double-milf ticket in 2012:

sarah-palin-nikki-haley.jpg
 
Uhhh, let's see. The words "separation of church and state" are nowhere in the Constitution. They're from a Jefferson letter to the Baptists.

At some point it just becomes gross to see libtards get in one big circle jerk in their alternate fantasy world. They don't even know what the fuck they're talking about.

ignorant bitches...

rednecks...

religious nutballs...

dipshit...

far-right theocratic republicans...


teabaggers...

crazy motherfuckers
...

Palin and O donnell are idiots riding some teabagger wave...

When the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts to fit it. I suppose what's amazing is how many libtards on here don't realize what idiotic losers they look like.

They're doing the same thing here Kos and Ifill did with Palin yesterday re 1773; they're so pathetically desperate to discredit their opponent they simply make shit up and then jerk each other off in order to keep the fantasy alive.

You'd think these left wingers would realize how retarded and desperate they look, but clearly the message isn't getting through. So I'll spell it out for them.

THE WORDS "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE" ARE NOWHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION.

What's so fucking hard to understand about that?

The broader, underlying concept here is that left wingers have used those words in order to justify the eradication of our Judeo-Christian heritage from the public square, when in reality the original intent of Jefferson's words meant the exact opposite: protecting religion from the state, i.e. preventing exactly what these socialist, Marxist, Christian-hating scumbags are doing.

The bait and switch here is that the leftwing idiots are trying to convince you that O'Donnell is unaware of the First Amendment vis a vis establishment of religion. Don't get suckered in by the lie.

Yes, it's a dirty tactic. Yes, it's dishonest. But this is all they have. The people realized what disgusting socialist losers they are and are coming like the Four Horsemen in November. They're throwing everything against the wall and hoping it sticks. That Marxist idiot Grayson calls his opponent "Taliban Dan". Another leftist idiot Conway creates an entire television ad out of an ANONYMOUS woman's claim against his opponent. Obama claims Japan is financing the GOP when his own campaign rigged his credit card donation systems for fraud during the '08 elections.

Yes, we're all sick and disgusted of it. But keep the faith. Change is coming. We'll eject these Marxist bastards from office and back to the holes they slithered out from. Can you see November from your house?
 
Attacking your opponents - through the media, PR leaks, ads, etc. - has always been the best way to get elected. The masses are drawn to drama. If you're a political strategist, that's what you focus on during the election. That's how you close the sale. It doesn't matter what you say; all that matters is that you make it sound convincing.

Remember when Biden was running against Obama for the Oval Office? Remember the unkind things he said? In a recent interview, Biden admitted (he's always had a loose tongue) that it's just part of the game. That's what you do if you want to get elected.

This has been going on long before any of us were alive, and will continue long after we're dust and maggot food. Here's a funny article filled with interesting details about past elections:

5 Presidential Elections Even Dumber Than This One (Somehow) | Cracked.com

Almost all politicians do it. The ones who don't, know their reach is limited. Everyone here knows this. Rapists rape. Molesters molest. Liars will continue to lie to get what they want (votes).

Blame the voters who believe the bullshit.