George Zimmerman Launches Website



He must have designed that site back in 1996 knowing full well he'd need it one day after he put two slugs in some black kid.
 
I actualy like ms paint themed sites, but this story doesn't look like its about to end well.
 
Here's a good question:

Can George Zimmerman Get a Fair Trial? - Wendy Kaminer - National - The Atlantic

I'm not questioning the outrage generated by Martin's killing and the cursory initial investigation of it. I'm not criticizing the campaign to re-open the case, the demand for federal intervention, or the skepticism about Zimmerman's story and his self-defense claim. I'm commenting on the dilemma posed by popular campaigns for criminal prosecutions: The effort to correct what appears to have been one grievous injustice risks creating another.

If Zimmerman is indicted by state authorities for homicide, or for a federal hate crime, where in the world will the judiciary find an impartial jury? So many people have already convicted Zimmerman; so much prejudicial evidence and speculation have been so widely disseminated.
 
this martin zimmerman shit in the news is one of the biggest facepalm moments I can remember in recent U.S. idiocy.

neither of them matter, the fact this idiotic story is being played 24/7 is fucking mind boggling. people are fucking killed each and every day, some black on black crime, some white on black, some black on white. why the FUCK am I hearing about this shit everytime I turn around?

OHHHHH right, because it's white on black crime.

fuck Martin, fuck Zimmerman, and fuck the U.S. news companies who run this bullshit story 24/7 as if it's important
 
this martin zimmerman shit in the news is one of the biggest facepalm moments I can remember in recent U.S. idiocy.

neither of them matter, the fact this idiotic story is being played 24/7 is fucking mind boggling. people are fucking killed each and every day, some black on black crime, some white on black, some black on white. why the FUCK am I hearing about this shit everytime I turn around?

OHHHHH right, because it's white on black crime.

To your point, here's another good piece:

Violence and race: a two-way street - CNN.com

(Sorry for the derail.)
 
this martin zimmerman shit in the news is one of the biggest facepalm moments I can remember in recent U.S. idiocy.

neither of them matter, the fact this idiotic story is being played 24/7 is fucking mind boggling. people are fucking killed each and every day, some black on black crime, some white on black, some black on white. why the FUCK am I hearing about this shit everytime I turn around?

OHHHHH right, because it's white on black crime.

fuck Martin, fuck Zimmerman, and fuck the U.S. news companies who run this bullshit story 24/7 as if it's important

This is a marketing forum so we here should have a better idea about how the public likes to focus in on emotional and controversial stories, even if they are just anecdotal. We should also have a better idea about how the "news" is mainly about making money, not about covering what is most important.

You're right, 50 or whatever murders do happen every day in the US. People can't get emotionally involved with 350 victims and 350 suspects a week though. Focusing on OJ Simpson, Jon Benet Ramsey, or Casey Anthony for a month is better for tv ratings than covering 1,500 cases.

Brenda's story about losing weight is more powerful and inspirational to the general public than charts and graphs or interviews with scientists talking about thousands of people loosing weight.

Obama is about as "white" as Zimmerman. The racial angle is obviously there, but if Trayvon had been 40 years old and was friend's with Zimmerman, and the death happened after the two had got into a fight in a home, the media coverage wouldn't be what it is.

A "child" walking to the store to buy candy getting killed in the street by a gun -- there's plenty of emotional triggers there that have nothing to do with race. Marketers use emotional triggers to make money and so does the media.
 
This is being done by the news media because one Reason:

Florida is in play for 2012 President Election. The left needs to turn out votes in FL
if they lose FL they will lose the white house.

Who you vote for..up to you.. just saying.. its plain as day here....
 
This is a marketing forum so we here should have a better idea about how the public likes to focus in on emotional and controversial stories, even if they are just anecdotal. We should also have a better idea about how the "news" is mainly about making money, not about covering what is most important.

You're right, 50 or whatever murders do happen every day in the US. People can't get emotionally involved with 350 victims and 350 suspects a week though. Focusing on OJ Simpson, Jon Benet Ramsey, or Casey Anthony for a month is better for tv ratings than covering 1,500 cases.

Brenda's story about losing weight is more powerful and inspirational to the general public than charts and graphs or interviews with scientists talking about thousands of people loosing weight.

Obama is about as "white" as Zimmerman. The racial angle is obviously there, but if Trayvon had been 40 years old and was friend's with Zimmerman, and the death happened after the two had got into a fight in a home, the media coverage wouldn't be what it is.

A "child" walking to the store to buy candy getting killed in the street by a gun -- there's plenty of emotional triggers there that have nothing to do with race. Marketers use emotional triggers to make money and so does the media.


Yes, thank you. I know WHY I'm seeing it all over the news and WHAT their goal for doing so is, it just drives me fucking insane.