GirlWritesWhat

BabyGotBacklink said:
I very much agree with this. I think the mistake feminism in the US took was when they decided "equal rights" wasn't enough, they wanted men to be more like women. I always thought it was crazy, almost as if they were fighting against basic concepts of nature and biology, trying to erase inherently male traits and instincts from the American man. I see how this made a lot of men angry, and another, younger generation just seems confused and broken by it.

I don't mean to make sweeping generalizations, every man is different but there has definitely been some backlash. They erased things that they probably didn't mean to, not an exact science I'm sure. They wanted guys to be sensitive, intuitive and non-aggressive (manageable?) but with that came a generation of men with less of a protective instinct less of a provider mindset. So lots of single moms. Lots of fatherless kids. Lots of victim mentality and helpless feelings. Again, not all men certainly and there is some blame on both sides but generally not a great idea to try to take the man out of the man.
Click to expand...

Almost every single second wave feminist is a radical lesbian and/or marxist.
 


Another thing I've noticed these days is that younger guys (under 30) act like women when it comes to winning the hearts of women.

When I was a young pup, there was a guy code where you didn't try to sabotage another guy while he was talking up a girl.

I can never remember a time back in the day when some guy pulled the girl away from me or tried some shit to try to fuck up my game while I was conversing with a chick.

These days, guys will act like jealous little girls and actively try to fuck up your game instead of respecting the guy code and letting you have your time at bat.

I don't know where this shit came from. Maybe it has to do with the PUA community who might be teaching it or maybe it's just boys acting like girls now. But whatever it is, I think the guy code needs to be reinstated.

1. You don't fuck with another guy's car.
2. You don't sabotage his efforts with a woman.
 
rusvik said:
I'm impressed that there is an analytical mind behind tomaszjot lol.

You're quite right, the modern welfare states is screwing the average joe over massively.

In the scandinavian countries there have been several actual studies done on the economic burden of the sexes. In Denmark it was found that the average male contributes about $300,000 more in taxes during a lifetime than he receives back in services, while a female receives $400,000 more than she pays in during a lifetime.

Just to make it easy:

Man: +$300,000
Woman: -$400,000

Now, who cares right?

It is almost tyrranical and abhorrent to force a single man to pay for the offspring of others, it is in fact state mandatory cuckoldry. The single man is basically a slave to the femi-state, taxed to death so that single mothers can live a life of relative luxury.

I can go on and on about this, but I'll just say that every action has a reaction and that history shows us that the pendulum usually swings back. Once the average man realizes that he is beeing fleeced by the femi-state but doesn't get a famliy in return, then he will simply stop working or move to another country.

This kind of war against patriarchy however is just one part of the socialist-globalist movement and it would be unfair to blame women, they do have a problem of always seeing how far they can push things until someone (a man), says no.

The real bad guys are the leftists who've worked dilligently to destroy the family, the community and gender roles. This is no coincidence either. It is plainly written in sight in every early marxist writing. Feminism is pure marxism.

In any case, I find most of those MRA people to be whiners who have just a futile task for them as trying to vote the government smaller.
Click to expand...

I'd be interested in seeing a study of how those numbers end up in the USA and Canada.

One of the reasons I don't want to stay in Toronto long term(beyond the next few years) is because of how leftist and politically correct it is. Its pretty much one of the centers of feminism.

I remember seeing a study which showed that women's happiness declined in the last 35 years. Men's happiness has stayed in the same.

You can see it here. Girls look pretty pissed off most of the time, and seem extremely stressed. Careerism doesn't seem to be helping them. I'd say a good majority of women are really not cut out for cutthroat careers. Obviously some are and more power to them.

But what modern feminist idealogy does is tell ALL women that they NEED to have a career to be happy and they don't need no man. And then it tells them that if something goes wrong its not their fault but its the patriarchy's fault.

The majority of men are told to be ashamed of being "privileged", and they end up being little friendzoned bitches. They keep hearing how women are privileged and develop white knight syndrome. Or maybe they don't have a positive masculine presence in their life to teach them how to be masculine.

Basically everyone loses. Women lose their natural femininity and disown it leading them to be more unhappy. Men lose their masculinity which leads to a horrible existence. You have a society that slowly becomes more and more androgynous each gender becomes more like the other. The natural yin yang is slowly destroyed.

A great book that helped me understand this was the Way of the Superior Man by David Deida. A great read.
 
Gloria Steinem was CIA and you if emasculate men (and also use various means to keep them confined to the lower levels of Maslow's needs hierarchy) the easier it is to bend over the citizens. This is why they want to take away the guns.

Women as a group are just doing what comes naturally :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom