Go to Hell, Libertarians!



6plGC.gif
 
I don't understand why she is angry.

This is how democracy works. Sometimes you win, and sometimes Obama wins.

If you believe in democracy, then you gotta like that Obama won, because he won democratically.

I like how insane she is. And she can't understand why no one will share her links, and her side lost the election.

Who in their right mind would vote for a movement that included a "lady" like this?
 
KsyDI.jpg


"I was in a Sarah Palin group for 8 years"


Shelly L. Dankert
January 30
Any group that calls itself a "Tea Party" and can still see fit to endorse one of the 2 frontrunners is not any "Tea Party" I'll have any part of. The 2 frontrunners are BOTH anathema to the Tea Party that I've supported for the past almost 3 years.

The Tea Party needs to WAKE UP!!! They've fallen asleep and are settling again for the "status quo," which, as Governor Palin put it in her speech in
Indianola, IA is "Latin for 'more of the same of the mess that we're in.'"

A 20+ year Washington insider like Gingrich is NOT the vision of the Tea Party. A former liberal/moderate/progressive like Romney isn't either. I don't know if Santorum is. I know that Ron Paul is on domestic issues and that's IT.

I, as a member of the Tea Party wanted politicians that would NOT lie to me. I wanted people that would represent MY VALUES. I wanted representation that has ALWAYS shared my view of American values. I didn't want some slick, polished, too-smart-for-their-own-good politician that would change the way they've always spoken in order to get me to vote for them now.

This "Tea Party" that is supporting either one of the frontrunners is NOT my Tea Party.

My Tea Party understood Sarah Palin and EVERYTHING that she has stood for. Period. My Tea Party never had to do weeks-worth of investigating into Sarah Palin's record to try to figure out if she was blowing smoke up our butts or not. My Tea Party KNEW where Sarah Palin stood. My Tea Party KNEW where Sarah Palin stands now.

My Tea Party would support Sarah Palin for president and wouldn't accept ANYTHING BUT.
Click to expand...

Today:
Shelly @shellymic http://Conservative.PRO -Palin YouTuber -
SUB: http://www.youtube.com/user/shellymicAB …
News junkie. Liked vids=I like that the info is out, not necessarily the content. Nebraska · https://NebraskAttitude.blogspot.com
Click to expand...
 
Hellblazer and her can one day have camsex and then two extremely bright beams will shoot vertically out of their mouths that jesus uses to decend onto earth and can finally judge us all.
 
I checked out her Youtube channel. She's just like Hellblazer, another one of these hypercharged Glenn Beck fueled conservatives who have no clue what they are talking about.

Glenn Beck is truly the anti-christ. His ability to suck in lonely, anti-intellectual white people and destroy their souls with a torrent of hatred and nonsense, is absolutely amazing.
 
guerilla said:
I don't understand why she is angry.
This is how democracy works. Sometimes you win, and sometimes Obama wins.
If you believe in democracy, then you gotta like that Obama won, because he won democratically.
Click to expand...

I did not watch the video so I am not defending the person it. At the same time you can like the system, but not the result. Assuming you believe the system is not as broken as it is. You always say these types of things and yet it is a dishonest portrayal. Even an uneducated person can see this.


guerilla said:
Who in their right mind would vote for a movement that included a "lady" like this?
Click to expand...

All movements have odd, strange, crazy, and stupid people within their ranks. Many OWS claim to be Anarchists and many of them were odd strange, crazy, and even stupid.
 
REIMktg said:
At the same time you can like the system, but not the result.
Click to expand...
Get a better system.

REIMktg said:
You always say these types of things and yet it is a dishonest portrayal. Even an uneducated person can see this.
Click to expand...
What's dishonest? You're a democrat. You knew in a democracy Obama could be re-elected. You believe in democracy, you've got to support this outcome.

It's not dishonest, on the contrary, it's holding YOU accountable for YOUR beliefs.

Look, when you deny your own self-rule, and willingly and happily argue for collective judgment, you've got no damn right to say a word about how the collective judgment doesn't suit you. You surrendered the right to complain when you denied your own sovereignty.
 
guerilla said:
you gotta like that Obama won, because he won democratically.
Click to expand...

Except he didn't. Repeating your usual garbage over and over again doesn't make it true, as much as you might love preaching to the choir of retards here.
 
Just listened to this lady. She's a little scary.

Her problem is that she thinks it's a legitimate vote. She's angry because she thinks more Americans voted for Obama than Romney.

I'm not angry, I'm sad. Sad that they managed to successfully steal an election and sad for how many lives will be destroyed by the Obama cartel.
 
guerilla said:
Get a better system.
Click to expand...

If I were only not so lazy, I would. At least I am being honest in admitting my fault and the responsibility that goes with it. On the other hand there are countless others around here that are just as lazy and only want to "talk" a good game without taking action. The power, money, and skills in this forum alone could change the system through action. Yet I can only guess that few do. I say that is a guess because I am certain the impact would be one I would notice outside this forum if there were a concerted effort. Instead, I see nothing substantial.


guerilla said:
What's dishonest? You're a democrat. You knew in a democracy Obama could be re-elected. You believe in democracy, you've got to support this outcome.
It's not dishonest, on the contrary, it's holding YOU accountable for YOUR beliefs.
Look, when you deny your own self-rule, and willingly and happily argue for collective judgment, you've got no damn right to say a word about how the collective judgment doesn't suit you. You surrendered the right to complain when you denied your own sovereignty.
Click to expand...

When the system itself has built within it checks and balances as well as protected dissent then it is not dishonest to be unhappy with an outcome. Certainly I can abide by the outcome because I choose to live within this system, but I do not have to like it. There is no conflict between holding both of these views simultaneously. Nor does my support for the system require me to not alter my behavior relative to an outcome. I can just as easily take my capital gains within a non-profit or by some other means so as to minimize the consequences of the outcome.

This is the same under AnCap. You at some level submit to a Police agency or Society in which you choose to voluntarily interact. Of course I do not want to go through this right now as I gave up that right in a previous thread putting it off to a time when I have more time. I just posted ITT on your comment because it supporting the system does not mean you must "like" the current outcome.

Of course, I think the system is broken, but I understand that through my participation in voting I am still supporting the broken system. As pointed out, I am simply too lazy right now to take more action than I did. My vote being a way that I would hope would lessen the impact of the broken system on my life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom