Good Fucking Greif Limbaugh compares Obama's logo to Nazi's

Something is wrong, if you have to go back 40 years to find a time when your party lived up to what they are trying to preach.
.

There are actually some pretty cool conservative Republicans out there. The problem is that party is now run by a group of extremists and Sara Pallin types who have fun checking out Russia from their houses.

Women like Kay Bailey Hutchinson out of Texas are smart as hell and even though I don't agree with alot of what she says -for goodness sake what does it say when you pick an idiot like Sara Palin over a Kay Bailey Hutchinson.

Tim Palenty out of Minnesota is reasonable as well. Hell, even McCain's daughter is smart and looks like a Physics Nobel Laureate compared to Sara Palin.

There are actually some republicans out there that are reasonable and rational enough to have conversations with people like the socialist from Vermont and given their sincere interest in change and constructive politics will focus on the 5% of what they may agree with a socialist with vs. bickering over the 95% they DISAGREE with....


When Fox news and the Sara Palins of the world started speaking as the voice of that party, things got bad - really bad.

There are alot of people who are frustrated with the extreme left wing left as much as they are with the right.

But for goodness sake there aren't really any alternatives now with the way the Republicans are playing it.....
 


Right, because Sarah Palin didn't gain immense popularity in the GOP. Because when she was asked what papers she read and couldn't answer...it was the libural media asking a gotcha question, not her being a dumbass. When your party's mascot is Sarah Palin, how can you even try to say with a straight face that your party represents intellectuals

You're skirting the issue once again. You've not answered how Republicans are trying to "hold down" or "stamp out" the arts. Rather, all you've done is namecall and make stabs.
 
I got to thinking the other night about Hitler and the Nazi's while watching the History channel. They were able to brand the Nazi image as well as any other company in history. All of the swastika's and other propaganda images that they came up with were really genius. I'm not saying I condone their ideology or all of the horrible things they did, but if you look at the Nazi party from a brand standpoint, those guys fucking nailed it. Hitler would have been the best AM in the history of AM. I've always been intrigued with that eagle/swastika logo...and Obama's logo isn't even close if you ask me.

26197_f260.jpg
 
I got to thinking the other night about Hitler and the Nazi's while watching the History channel. They were able to brand the Nazi image as well as any other company in history. All of the swastika's and other propaganda images that they came up with were really genius. I'm not saying I condone their ideology or all of the horrible things they did, but if you look at the Nazi party from a brand standpoint, those guys fucking nailed it. Hitler would have been the best AM in the history of AM. I've always been intrigued with that eagle/swastika logo...and Obama's logo isn't even close if you ask me.

26197_f260.jpg

wrong.

Hitlier would have eaten his shit in AM. his ticks and mental problems would have fucked him up almost as bad as The Allies.

he was in the right place at the right time. He gave the impoverished germans something(one) to blame, nothing new.
 
Didn't read all the BS on here other than the first few posts but Limbaugh is really a great marketer when it comes down to it. I don't agree with the things he says and I don't think he even agrees with everything he says but he is a shock jock in the political world. He stirs up one side and has nuts on the other side loving him but either way even the haters listen in to hate which means $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
 
No, no, Hitler was far more left wing than Obama. Nazi is after all short for the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

Hitler, Speech of May 1, 1927:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions"
and
"Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings."

Hitler loved unions, chapter 12 of Hitler's Mein Kampf:

"As things stand today, the trade unions in my opinion cannot be dispensed with. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions of the nation's economic life. Their significance lies not only in the social and political field, but even more in the general field of national politics. A people whose broad masses, through a sound trade-union movement, obtain the satisfaction of their living requirements and at the same time an education, will be tremendously strengthened in its power of resistance in the struggle for existence".
Hitler also completely for big government, with the government regulating the economy.
Even Lenin, btw, did not consider himself a leftist, see his essay "Left-wing Communism, an infantile disorder".

Hitler also loved 'affirmative action' and equal rights, here is his election poster from 1933:
"The Marshall and the corporal fight alongside us for peace and equal rights"


Hitler, on the far left (against Social Democrats):
"There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will."


Goebbels, against flithy capitals and for the working class:
The bourgeois is about to leave the historical stage. In its place will come the class of productive workers, the working class, that has been up until today oppressed. It is beginning to fulfill its political mission. It is involved in a hard and bitter struggle for political power as it seeks to become part of the national organism. The battle began in the economic realm; it will finish in the political. It is not merely a matter of pay, not only a matter of the number of hours worked in a day-though we may never forget that these are an essential, perhaps even the most significant part of the socialist platform-but it is much more a matter of incorporating a powerful and responsible class in the state, perhaps even to make it the dominant force in the future politics of the Fatherland

Hitler on 'religious tolerance':

"For the Jew was still characterized for me by nothing but his religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I maintained my rejection of religious attacks in this case as in others. Consequently, the tone, particularly that of the Viennese anti-Semitic press, seemed to me unworthy of the cultural tradition of a great nation".

Karl Marx:
"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew -- not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew. Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Jewry, would be the self-emancipation of our time.... We recognize in Jewry, therefore, a general present-time-oriented anti-social element, an element which through historical development -- to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed -- has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily dissolve itself. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Jewry".

Hitler the greenie:

Hitler was also a vegetarian and an avid supporter of homeopathic cures. Hitler sponsored the creation of organic farming. Himmler grew herbs on his organic farm for his troops. Hitler banned experiments on animals (he preferred Jews) and created many national parks.

more from Mein Kampf:
"When people attempt to rebel against the iron logic of nature, they come into conflict with the very same principles to which they owe their existence as human beings. Their actions against nature must lead to their own downfall."

Hitler on controlling population, because earth's resources are limited:
"Germany has an annual increase in population of nearly nine hundred thousand souls. The difficulty of feeding this army of new citizens must grow greater from year to year and ultimately end in catastrophe, unless ways and means are found to forestall the danger of starvation and misery in time... Without doubt the productivity of the soil can be increased up to a certain limit. But only up to a certain limit, and not continuously without end..... But even with the greatest limitation on the one hand and the utmost industry on other, here again a limit will one day be reached, created by the soil itself. With the utmost toil it will not be possible to obtain any more from it, and then, though postponed for a certain time, catastrophe again manifests itself". (Mein Kampf pp. 121 & 122).
Ernst Lehmann, a Nazi biologist:
"We recognise that separating humanity from nature, from the whole of life, leads to humankind's own destruction and to the death of nations. "Only through a re-integration of humanity into the whole of nature can our people be made stronger . .

"This striving toward connectedness with the totality of life, with nature itself, a nature into which we are born, this is the deepest meaning and the true essence of National Socialist thought."

Hitler liked big business? No. Item 16 of the (February 25th., 1920) 25 point plan of the National Socialist German Workers Party (written by Hitler) sought the abolition of big stores and their replacement by small businesses.

Mussolini was even more leftist than Hitler. He allowed a sort of capitalism to continue, but ultimately he saw it as a stepping stone on a gradual march towards socialism and then Communist - a common view of the modern left. Under Mussolini Italy was the biggest welfare state in Europe.

Limbaugh's comparison above is completely retarded, but Obama has far more in common with Hitler in his views than Bush ever did.
Not to mention that the Left is responsible for many more millions dead in the 20th century than any so called Right-wing leaders (Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin etc).
Its that glorious march towards socialist utopia - gotta break a few eggs to make an omlette!
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS3WearGUzA]YouTube - Good Grief! Linus and Charlie Brown Are Thrown into Election[/ame]
 
^^^ like his leanings or opinions could be taken seriously? the guy was batshit


He is quoted as an exponent of Nazism, which, you may notice, is strongly on topic here. As such, the quotes/comments included Himmler, Lehmann and Mussolini as well. In line with Limbaugh's rather retarded comparison relating to Nazism, not Hitler per se.

Limbaugh's babbling, btw, is pretty much in line with loony left conspiracy battling about the skull and crossbones insignia being used by the US military, ZOMG so did the Nazi SS! Except Limbaugh is drawing an even longer bow here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_crossbones_(military)
 
Because bush was very similar to Hitler. Bush used the media the same way hitler did to influence the news and what information the public received. How do u think Hitler got so many crazies to hate jews that much? And how did Bush win the second election? That's the biggest similarity that I see.

useful idiot
 
Because bush was very similar to Hitler. Bush used the media the same way hitler did to influence the news and what information the public received. How do u think Hitler got so many crazies to hate jews that much? And how did Bush win the second election? That's the biggest similarity that I see.


Other than that you're an idiot, you'll find Jew-hatred was extremely common in those times and Hitler really didn't need to work much on that. See my Karl Marx quote above. The left of the time hated the Jews more than the conservatives did, because the Jews to them represented capitalism.

A British ambassador of the time was quoted as saying that if someone asked him in the 1920s who in Europe would go on Jew killing rampage he would have confidently replied it would be the French, not the Germans.
Even the Russian tzars had the forged Protocols of Zion written to scape-goat the Jews. Russian Cossacks were going around trying to wipe out Jews several decades before Hitler got in on the act.

An interesting aside - the then Mufti of Jerusalem, who was a good friend of Hitler, asked Hitler to please come and help him recreate the Holocaust in the Arab lands (no Palestine back then, just an Ottoman Empire backwater and then a British protactorate). Even the early Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was hugely influenced by Hitler. Iran was renamed Iran by the Shah to suck up to Hitler and prove their Aryaness. The Nazi Muslim regiments from Bosnia and Albania were pretty keen on the Jew slaughter too. Not to mention the Ukranians.
 
x6jtzq.jpg


People who compare anyone to Hitler are just desperate idiots with no basis for their argument, liberals and libertarians included.
 
He allowed a sort of capitalism to continue, but ultimately he saw it as a stepping stone on a gradual march towards socialism and then Communist - a common view of the modern left.

The most anti-communist group in history was trying to form a communist state? Go read the wiki or something for a refresh on high school history.

Nazi Party - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Nazi Party is generally described as being at the extreme or far right of the left-right political axis. While the party incorporated elements from both left and right-wing politics, the Nazis formed most of their alliances on the right."